植物研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 158-166.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2026.01.014
贾庆彬1(
), 姚旭东1, 金桂香1, 于宏影2, 李艳霞3
收稿日期:2025-07-01
出版日期:2026-01-20
发布日期:2026-01-20
通讯作者:
贾庆彬
E-mail:jqb408@qq.com
作者简介:贾庆彬(1987—),博士,副研究员,主要从事林木遗传改良研究。
基金资助:
Qingbin JIA1(
), Xudong YAO1, Guixiang JIN1, Hongying YU2, Yanxia LI3
Received:2025-07-01
Online:2026-01-20
Published:2026-01-20
Contact:
Qingbin JIA
E-mail:jqb408@qq.com
摘要:
通过分析不同林龄红松(Pinus koraiensis)半同胞家系径生长遗传变异,进行优良家系选择,为红松高世代育种群体的组建提供优良材料。该研究以吉林省露水河林业有限公司国家红松良种基地内红松半同胞家系子代测定林为研究对象,分别测量林龄18、23、27、32 a的34个参试家系(包含1个对照)胸径,通过方差分析、Duncan法多重比较等方法比较家系间胸径性状差异性,根据方差分量计算表型与遗传变异系数、家系遗传力等遗传参数,采用BLUP法估算家系育种值,通过TOPSIS法对不同林龄时期参试家系的育种潜力进行综合评价,根据综合排名筛选优良家系。结果显示:林龄18、23、27 a时家系间胸径性状差异不显著(P>0.05);林龄32 a时,家系间胸径性状差异达显著水平(P<0.05)。随林龄增长,参试家系间差异由不显著转为显著,表明遗传效应在林木生长过程中逐渐增强。遗传变异系数在不同林龄时期波动较小,表型变异系数随林龄增长逐渐降低。家系遗传力在林龄18~23 a时保持稳定(0.319~0.322),林龄27 a时显著下降至0.238,林龄32 a时期回升至0.346。参试家系育种值随林龄增长总体呈现优化趋势,正值家系数量占比增加。根据TOPSIS法综合评价排名,按15%入选率进行选择,766、774、851、899、853号家系入选,人工选择可获得4.06%的遗传进展。林龄32 a时,优良家系平均胸径值高出对照19.72%,现实增益12.40%、遗传增益4.29%,平均单株材积高出参试家系平均值33.09%。红松优良家系人工选择增益显著,可为今后高世代育种群体的组建提供优良繁育材料,对红松生长性状的遗传改良具有积极意义。
中图分类号:
贾庆彬, 姚旭东, 金桂香, 于宏影, 李艳霞. 红松半同胞家系胸径遗传变异分析与优良家系选择[J]. 植物研究, 2026, 46(1): 158-166.
Qingbin JIA, Xudong YAO, Guixiang JIN, Hongying YU, Yanxia LI. Genetic Variation Analysis of Radial Growth and Superior Family Selection in Korean Pine Half-Sib Families[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2026, 46(1): 158-166.
表1
红松半同胞家系间胸径差异性比较
林龄 Stand age/a | 变异来源 Source of variation | 平方和 SS | 自由度 df | 均方 MS | F | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 家系Family | 138.913 | 33 | 4.209 | 1.468 | 0.054 |
| 区组Block | 76.170 | 8 | 9.521 | 3.320 | 0.001 | |
| 误差Error | 757.048 | 264 | 2.868 | |||
| 总计Total | 972.131 | 305 | ||||
| 23 | 家系Family | 262.894 | 33 | 7.966 | 1.475 | 0.052 |
| 区组Block | 25.344 | 8 | 3.168 | 0.587 | 0.789 | |
| 误差Error | 1 425.531 | 264 | 5.400 | |||
| 总计Total | 1 713.769 | 305 | ||||
| 27 | 家系Family | 334.746 | 33 | 10.144 | 1.312 | 0.126 |
| 区组Block | 40.271 | 8 | 5.034 | 0.651 | 0.734 | |
| 误差Error | 2 040.439 | 264 | 7.729 | |||
| 总计Total | 2 415.457 | 305 | ||||
| 32 | 家系Family | 490.650 | 33 | 14.868 | 1.529 | 0.037 |
| 区组Block | 583.690 | 8 | 72.961 | 7.504 | <0.010 | |
| 误差Error | 2 566.903 | 264 | 9.723 | |||
| 总计Total | 3 641.243 | 305 |
表2
红松半同胞家系胸径性状遗传参数估计
林龄 Stand age/a | 胸径均值 Mean DBH/cm | 变幅 Variation range/cm | 变异系数 CV | 遗传方差 | 表型方差 | 遗传变异系数 CV,G | 表型变异系数 CV,P | 家系遗传力 H2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 7.62 | 2.05~12.80 | 0.293 9 | 0.149 | 3.017 | 0.050 7 | 0.227 9 | 0.319 |
| 23 | 12.14 | 4.00~18.70 | 0.261 0 | 0.285 | 5.685 | 0.044 0 | 0.196 4 | 0.322 |
| 27 | 14.55 | 5.10~23.10 | 0.244 2 | 0.268 | 7.997 | 0.035 6 | 0.194 4 | 0.238 |
| 32 | 17.01 | 5.70~30.00 | 0.248 0 | 0.572 | 10.295 | 0.044 5 | 0.188 6 | 0.346 |
表3
红松半同胞家系胸径变异分析与育种值估算
林龄Stand age 18 a | 林龄Stand age 23 a | 林龄Stand age 27 a | 林龄Stand age 32 a | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
家系 Family | 均值 Mean/cm | 变异系数 CV | 育种值 Breeding value | 家系 Family | 均值 Mean/cm | 变异系数 CV | 育种值 Breeding value | 家系 Family | 均值 Mean/cm | 变异系数 CV | 育种值 Breeding value | 家系 Family | 均值 Mean/cm | 变异系数 CV | 育种值 Breeding value |
| 851 | 9.08±1.89a | 0.208 4 | 0.465 3 | 774 | 14.42±2.66a | 0.184 2 | 0.734 5 | 774 | 16.81±3.57a | 0.212 6 | 0.539 2 | 766 | 20.47±5.81a | 0.284 0 | 1.200 2 |
| 774 | 8.79±2.25ab | 0.256 1 | 0.371 8 | 766 | 14.26±3.22ab | 0.225 7 | 0.684 3 | 766 | 16.73±4.31ab | 0.257 7 | 0.518 5 | 774 | 19.63±3.76ab | 0.191 5 | 0.907 9 |
| 749 | 8.70±2.05abc | 0.235 6 | 0.346 1 | 851 | 13.61±2.55abc | 0.187 1 | 0.474 6 | 851 | 16.06±3.29abc | 0.204 9 | 0.358 8 | 899 | 18.66±4.41abc | 0.236 5 | 0.571 4 |
| 766 | 8.67±2.20abc | 0.254 0 | 0.333 1 | 749 | 13.42±3.18abc | 0.236 6 | 0.414 1 | 853 | 16.04±3.24abc | 0.202 1 | 0.354 6 | 853 | 18.56±3.50abc | 0.188 6 | 0.536 5 |
| 712 | 8.61±1.33abc | 0.154 7 | 0.314 9 | 853 | 13.34±3.21abc | 0.240 3 | 0.386 4 | 908 | 15.98±4.56abc | 0.285 6 | 0.340 3 | 851 | 18.27±4.41abc | 0.241 3 | 0.437 2 |
| 899 | 8.45±2.46abcd | 0.290 6 | 0.265 0 | 899 | 13.25±3.23abcd | 0.243 7 | 0.358 6 | 899 | 15.74±4.07abcd | 0.258 5 | 0.283 9 | 908 | 18.06±5.24abcd | 0.290 3 | 0.365 1 |
| 916 | 8.45±2.33abcd | 0.275 5 | 0.264 2 | 727 | 13.22±2.60abcd | 0.201 7 | 0.350 3 | 727 | 15.66±3.54abcd | 0.225 9 | 0.264 9 | 986 | 18.06±4.87abcd | 0.269 8 | 0.365 1 |
| 853 | 8.20±2.65abcd | 0.322 6 | 0.183 3 | 944 | 12.76±3.00abcde | 0.235 1 | 0.201 7 | 749 | 15.43±3.81abcd | 0.247 1 | 0.208 9 | 788 | 17.80±3.76abcd | 0.211 5 | 0.274 1 |
| 727 | 8.14±2.12abcd | 0.260 9 | 0.165 7 | 908 | 12.50±4.35abcde | 0.348 3 | 0.116 1 | 762 | 15.29±3.05abcd | 0.199 2 | 0.176 9 | 762 | 17.61±4.10abcd | 0.233 1 | 0.209 0 |
| 762 | 7.99±2.13abcd | 0.267 0 | 0.116 1 | 916 | 12.48±2.77abcde | 0.222 1 | 0.109 2 | 944 | 14.95±3.98abcd | 0.266 1 | 0.094 7 | 944 | 17.54±5.11abcd | 0.291 6 | 0.185 9 |
| 771 | 7.83±2.42abcd | 0.308 5 | 0.067 1 | 762 | 12.35±2.82abcde | 0.228 3 | 0.069 9 | 788 | 14.93±3.40abcd | 0.227 7 | 0.090 9 | 727 | 17.50±4.60abcd | 0.262 9 | 0.170 9 |
| 986 | 7.79±2.43abcd | 0.311 5 | 0.053 0 | 712 | 12.29±2.04abcde | 0.166 1 | 0.047 8 | 914 | 14.75±3.96abcd | 0.268 5 | 0.048 6 | 729 | 17.38±4.35abcd | 0.250 4 | 0.129 5 |
| 713 | 7.77±2.26abcd | 0.290 7 | 0.046 6 | 729 | 12.26±2.94abcde | 0.239 7 | 0.038 0 | 729 | 14.72±3.80abcd | 0.257 9 | 0.039 8 | 749 | 17.37±5.03abcd | 0.289 3 | 0.125 4 |
| 620 | 7.76±2.20abcd | 0.283 5 | 0.044 2 | 717 | 12.07±2.72abcde | 0.225 0 | -0.022 9 | 771 | 14.70±2.96abcd | 0.201 1 | 0.036 4 | 914 | 17.36±5.33abcd | 0.307 1 | 0.120 9 |
| 717 | 7.75±2.30abcd | 0.296 6 | 0.040 9 | 914 | 12.06±3.57abcde | 0.296 1 | -0.024 4 | 918 | 14.66±3.17abcd | 0.216 5 | 0.025 4 | 712 | 17.32±3.46abcd | 0.199 5 | 0.109 3 |
| 908 | 7.70±2.86abcd | 0.371 6 | 0.025 4 | 713 | 12.05±2.75abcde | 0.228 3 | -0.029 2 | 712 | 14.62±2.61abcd | 0.178 2 | 0.016 8 | 771 | 17.21±4.88 abcd | 0.283 4 | 0.072 2 |
| 715 | 7.55±2.43abcd | 0.321 4 | -0.023 6 | 788 | 11.92±3.28abcde | 0.275 2 | -0.069 4 | 715 | 14.37±3.24abcd | 0.225 7 | -0.041 8 | 715 | 17.09±3.84abcd | 0.224 6 | 0.029 2 |
| 944 | 7.53±1.69abcd | 0.224 0 | -0.028 4 | 909 | 11.90±3.09abcde | 0.259 3 | -0.077 2 | 620 | 14.21±3.51abcd | 0.246 9 | -0.081 3 | 916 | 17.02±3.08abcd | 0.181 0 | 0.004 2 |
| CK | 7.38±2.68abcd | 0.363 8 | -0.0761 | 877 | 11.83±2.49abcde | 0.210 2 | -0.098 8 | 916 | 14.21±3.11abcd | 0.219 2 | -0.081 1 | 918 | 16.91±3.36abcd | 0.198 5 | -0.032 9 |
| 757 | 7.23±3.03abcd | 0.419 2 | -0.125 9 | 771 | 11.80±3.82abcde | 0.323 7 | -0.108 5 | 739 | 14.18±3.37abcd | 0.237 5 | -0.088 4 | 717 | 16.76±3.97bcd | 0.236 9 | -0.085 8 |
| 863 | 7.18±2.08abcd | 0.289 8 | -0.140 8 | 986 | 11.72±4.14bcde | 0.352 9 | -0.133 0 | 651 | 14.14±3.27abcd | 0.231 1 | -0.096 3 | 739 | 16.66±3.98bcd | 0.239 1 | -0.120 7 |
| 924 | 7.17±2.03abcd | 0.283 5 | -0.143 4 | 918 | 11.71±2.67bcde | 0.228 4 | -0.137 7 | 713 | 14.14±3.43abcd | 0.242 9 | -0.098 5 | 713 | 16.64±3.94bcd | 0.236 7 | -0.126 9 |
| 909 | 7.16±1.76abcd | 0.245 8 | -0.146 7 | 739 | 11.67±3.04bcde | 0.260 2 | -0.151 5 | 877 | 14.08±3.17abcd | 0.225 2 | -0.113 0 | 818 | 16.63±3.15bcd | 0.189 6 | -0.131 6 |
| 877 | 7.15±2.18abcd | 0.304 4 | -0.152 5 | 651 | 11.66±4.10bcde | 0.351 7 | -0.152 1 | 818 | 14.06±3.70abcd | 0.263 2 | -0.116 6 | 620 | 16.40±3.93bcd | 0.239 6 | -0.210 2 |
| 729 | 7.14±2.07abcd | 0.290 6 | -0.153 4 | 767 | 11.58±2.54bcde | 0.219 0 | -0.181 1 | 909 | 14.05±3.50abcd | 0.248 9 | -0.118 8 | 651 | 16.21±4.02bcd | 0.248 3 | -0.275 2 |
| 739 | 7.12±2.20abcd | 0.309 1 | -0.161 4 | 620 | 11.57±3.59bcde | 0.310 5 | -0.183 7 | 717 | 13.97±2.76abcd | 0.197 3 | -0.139 1 | CK | 15.97±4.85cd | 0.303 7 | -0.358 5 |
| 651 | 7.06±2.57bcd | 0.363 4 | -0.179 4 | 715 | 11.52±3.75cde | 0.325 2 | -0.199 4 | 767 | 13.79±2.95abcd | 0.213 7 | -0.180 6 | 909 | 15.91±4.66cd | 0.293 1 | -0.379 0 |
| 918 | 6.99±2.21bcd | 0.316 8 | -0.200 2 | CK | 11.39±3.33cde | 0.292 3 | -0.239 8 | 986 | 13.68±4.58abcd | 0.334 9 | -0.207 4 | 757 | 15.68±4.55cd | 0.290 1 | -0.458 8 |
| 767 | 6.95±2.03bcd | 0.291 9 | -0.214 1 | 757 | 11.36±3.68cde | 0.324 3 | -0.250 8 | 757 | 13.51±4.41bcd | 0.326 7 | -0.247 1 | 877 | 15.65±3.85cd | 0.246 2 | -0.468 8 |
| 788 | 6.94±2.23bcd | 0.321 9 | -0.218 4 | 863 | 11.32±3.04cde | 0.268 2 | -0.263 0 | CK | 13.50±3.61bcd | 0.267 4 | -0.248 9 | 767 | 15.52±3.21cd | 0.206 7 | -0.512 8 |
| 818 | 6.90±1.66bcd | 0.240 7 | -0.231 1 | 818 | 11.31±2.91cde | 0.257 0 | -0.265 4 | 863 | 13.48±3.91bcd | 0.289 9 | -0.255 1 | 963 | 15.41±3.66cd | 0.237 6 | -0.553 7 |
| 914 | 6.80±2.30bcd | 0.338 7 | -0.262 4 | 760 | 11.02±3.47cde | 0.315 1 | -0.360 0 | 963 | 13.18±3.15cd | 0.239 1 | -0.327 2 | 863 | 15.24±4.43cd | 0.290 9 | -0.612 6 |
| 760 | 6.74±2.27cd | 0.336 8 | -0.279 8 | 963 | 10.58±3.11de | 0.294 4 | -0.501 7 | 924 | 12.59±3.47d | 0.275 7 | -0.466 5 | 924 | 15.13±3.82cd | 0.252 8 | -0.648 2 |
| 963 | 6.48±2.22d | 0.343 1 | -0.365 2 | 924 | 10.47±3.13e | 0.299 3 | -0.536 0 | 760 | 12.49±3.86d | 0.309 2 | -0.491 0 | 760 | 14.59±4.18d | 0.286 8 | -0.837 9 |
表4
红松半同胞家系不同林龄时期胸径育种值综合排名
家系 Family | 最优向量距离 | 最劣向量距离 | 接近度 Ci | 排序 Rank | 家系 Family | 最优向量距离 | 最劣向量距离 | 接近度 Ci | 排序 Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 766 | 0.110 3 | 1.385 9 | 0.926 3 | 1 | 713 | 0.875 5 | 0.585 8 | 0.400 9 | 18 |
| 774 | 0.136 6 | 1.359 4 | 0.908 7 | 2 | 717 | 0.880 5 | 0.580 7 | 0.397 4 | 19 |
| 851 | 0.356 2 | 1.169 3 | 0.766 5 | 3 | 715 | 0.899 9 | 0.567 8 | 0.386 9 | 20 |
| 899 | 0.404 5 | 1.051 5 | 0.722 2 | 4 | 918 | 0.943 9 | 0.543 4 | 0.365 4 | 21 |
| 853 | 0.417 4 | 1.049 0 | 0.715 4 | 5 | 620 | 0.937 1 | 0.536 2 | 0.364 0 | 22 |
| 749 | 0.521 1 | 0.997 1 | 0.656 8 | 6 | 739 | 0.981 3 | 0.480 4 | 0.328 7 | 23 |
| 727 | 0.551 1 | 0.930 2 | 0.627 9 | 7 | 909 | 1.021 2 | 0.444 7 | 0.303 3 | 24 |
| 908 | 0.612 3 | 0.886 9 | 0.591 6 | 8 | 651 | 1.024 0 | 0.439 2 | 0.300 2 | 25 |
| 762 | 0.660 3 | 0.804 9 | 0.549 3 | 9 | 877 | 1.048 9 | 0.424 8 | 0.288 2 | 26 |
| 712 | 0.693 9 | 0.816 4 | 0.540 6 | 10 | 818 | 1.055 5 | 0.422 4 | 0.285 8 | 27 |
| 944 | 0.707 1 | 0.758 2 | 0.517 4 | 11 | CK | 1.079 9 | 0.381 0 | 0.260 8 | 28 |
| 916 | 0.745 7 | 0.760 1 | 0.504 8 | 12 | 767 | 1.124 9 | 0.343 4 | 0.233 9 | 29 |
| 771 | 0.806 2 | 0.661 8 | 0.450 8 | 13 | 757 | 1.121 3 | 0.336 9 | 0.231 0 | 30 |
| 729 | 0.835 2 | 0.643 5 | 0.435 2 | 14 | 863 | 1.168 1 | 0.301 3 | 0.205 1 | 31 |
| 788 | 0.858 7 | 0.659 8 | 0.434 5 | 15 | 924 | 1.330 7 | 0.192 7 | 0.126 5 | 32 |
| 986 | 0.852 9 | 0.651 7 | 0.433 1 | 16 | 963 | 1.330 4 | 0.159 6 | 0.107 1 | 33 |
| 914 | 0.905 3 | 0.609 8 | 0.402 5 | 17 | 760 | 1.373 9 | 0.121 9 | 0.081 5 | 34 |
| [1] | 李爽.红松人工林多目标经营模型[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2025. |
| LI S.Management models for multi-objectives of Korean pine plantations[D].Harbin:Northeast Forestry University,2025. | |
| [2] | 杨文,陈立新,段文标,等.红松人工林立地质量评价及生长收获效益[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2024,44(6):102-111. |
| YANG W, CHEN L X, DUAN W B,et al.Site quality evaluation and growth harvest benefit of Pinus koraiensis plantation[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2024,44(6):102-111. | |
| [3] | 刘云天.辽东山区红松人工林单木干形及材积模型研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2024. |
| LIU Y T.Study on the stem shape and volume model of planted Korean pine in eastern Liaoning Province[D].Shenyang:Shenyang Agricultural University,2024. | |
| [4] | 潘凤刚,孙佰飞,张含国,等.红松自由授粉子代测定及优良家系选择[J].林业科技,2023,48(5):1-5. |
| PAN F G, SUN B F, ZHANG H G,et al.Determination of free-pollinated progeny of Pinus koraiensis and selection of excellent families[J].Forestry Science & Technology,2023,48(5):1-5. | |
| [5] | 谷加存,楚旭,王政权.水曲柳人工林直径生长与培育技术[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(9):7-9,57. |
| GU J C, CHU X, WANG Z Q.Diameter growth of Fraxinus mandshurica and its relation to silviculture techniques[J].Journal of Northeast Foresrty University,2010,38(9):7-9,57. | |
| [6] | 任雲雲,李雪,崔自杰,等.中国大径材人工林培育研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2024,37(3):86-93. |
| REN Y Y, LI X, CUI Z J,et al.Research progress in cultivation of large-diameter timber plantation in China[J].World Forestry Research,2024,37(3):86-93. | |
| [7] | 王雪来,刘晓婷,王力冉,等.生长和木材性状耦合评价红松半同胞家系[J].植物研究,2024,44(4):554-564. |
| WANG X L, LIU X T, WANG L R,et al.Coupling evaluation of growth and wood properties of Pinus koraiensis half-sib families[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,2024,44(4):554-564. | |
| [8] | 魏嘉彤,陈思琪,芦贤博,等.基于生长与木材性状的红松优良种源评价选择[J].北京林业大学学报,2022, 44(3):12-23. |
| WEI J T, CHEN S Q, LU X B,et al.Evaluation and selection of excellent provenances of Pinus koraiensis based on growth and wood properties[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2022,44(3):12-23. | |
| [9] | 李岩,朱嘉瑶,王喜和,等.红松优树无性系及其子代的生长评价与选择研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(10):38-46. |
| LI Y, ZHU J Y, WANG X H,et al.Growth evaluation and selection study of elite clones and its offspring families in Pinus koraiensis [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2021,43(10):38-46. | |
| [10] | 孙佰飞.红松自由授粉家系生长变异分析及优良家系选择研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2023. |
| SUN B F.Analysis of growth variation and selection of excellent families of Korean pine in open pollination[D].Harbin:Northeast Forestry University,2023. | |
| [11] | 贾庆彬,张含国,张磊,等.杂种落叶松家系变异分析与优良家系选择[J].东北林业大学学报,2016,44(4):1-7. |
| JIA Q B, ZHANG H G, ZHANG L,et al.Variation analysis of hybrid larch families and superior families selection[J].Journal of Northeast Foresrty University,2016,44(4):1-7. | |
| [12] | 尚福强,马晓雨,高源,等.38年生红松优树半同胞子代遗传变异与优良家系选择[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2025,45(3):20-27. |
| SHANG F Q, MA X Y, GAO Y,et al.Genetic variation and superior family selection of half-sib progeny of 38-year-old Pinus koraiensis [J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2025,45(3):20-27. | |
| [13] | 王雪来.基于谱系重建的红松优良家系选择研究[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2024. |
| WANG X L.Selection of superior families of Pinus koraiensis base on pedigree reconstruction[D].Harbin:Northeast Forestry University,2024. | |
| [14] | 张秦徽,王洪武,姜国云,等.红松半同胞家系变异分析及选择研究[J].植物研究,2019,39(4):557-567. |
| ZHANG Q H, WANG H W, JIANG G Y,et al.Variation analysis and selection of Pinus koraiensis half-sib families[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,2019,39(4):557-567. | |
| [15] | 杨瑞轲,金星姬, TIMO P,等.基于林分生长和径阶分配模型系统的红松人工林经营优化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2025,49(4):117-127. |
| YANG R K, JIN X J, TIMO P,et al.Stand-level growth model system with diameter class disaggregation for optimizing the management of Korean pine plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition),2025,49(4):117-127. | |
| [16] | 马颢铜.不同树龄红松径向生长的变化规律及主要影响因素[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2024. |
| MA H T.Changes and impact factors to radial growth of Pinus koraiensis with different tree ages[D].Harbin:Northeast Forestry University,2024. | |
| [17] | 邓厚银,胡德活,林军,等.杉木半同胞子代胸径变异和大径材家系选择[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2020,28(5):513-519. |
| DENG H Y, HU D H, LIN J,et al.Diameter variation of Chinese fir half-sib progenies and selection for large-size timber families[J].Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany,2020,28(5):513-519. | |
| [18] | 孙佰飞,张磊,张含国,等.红松半同胞家系生长性状遗传评估及优良家系选择[J].东北林业大学学报,2023,51(6):1-5. |
| SUN B F, ZHANG L, ZHANG H G,et al.Genetic evaluation of growth traits in Pinus koraiensis half-sib families and selection of elite families[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2023,51(6):1-5. | |
| [19] | 尚福强,王云鹏,马晓雨,等.红松全同胞家系生长性状遗传变异规律及选择[J].西部林业科学,2025,54(1):37-43. |
| SHANG F Q, WANG Y P, MA X Y,et al.Genetic variation and selection of growth traits of full-sib families of Pinus koraiensis [J].Journal of West China Forestry Science,2025,54(1):37-43. | |
| [20] | 范迎新,贾炜玮,李凤日,等.帽儿山不同种源人工红松的生长差异性[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(7):1735-1743. |
| FAN Y X, JIA W W, LI F R,et al.Growth difference of planted Pinus koraiensis from different provenances in Maoer Mountain,China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2024,35(7):1735-1743. | |
| [21] | 孙凡,马彦广,刘占民,等.油松高世代种子园亲本选择策略研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2024,46(4):28-39. |
| SUN F, MA Y G, LIU Z M,et al.Parental selection strategies of high generation seed orchard of Pinus tabuliformis [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2024, 46(4):28-39. | |
| [22] | 袁志发,常智杰,郭满才,等.数量性状遗传分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2015. |
| YUAN Z F, CHANG Z J, GUO M C,et al.Genetic analysis of quantitative traits[M].Beijing:Science Press,2015. | |
| [23] | 林元震,陈晓阳.R与ASReml-R统计分析教程[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014. |
| LIN Y Z, CHEN X Y.R & ASReml-R statistical analysis tutorial[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2014. | |
| [24] | 欧阳天林,朱柯帆,邱建勋,等.木荷种子园自由授粉家系生长遗传变异及初选[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2022,42(9):17-23. |
| OUYANG T L, ZHU K F, QIU J X,et al.Genetic variation and selection of the free-pollinated families in Schima superba seed orchard[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology,2022,42(9):17-23. | |
| [25] | 杨震,尹娟,杨莹攀,等.植物营养素施加对滴灌玉米生长、品质和水分利用效率的影响及其综合评价[J].节水灌溉,2024(5):80-87. |
| YANG Z, YIN J, YANG Y P,et al.Effect of plant nutrients on growth,quality and yield of drip-irrigated maize in saline soil and its comprehensive evaluation[J].Water Saving Irrigation,2024(5):80-87. | |
| [26] | 吉林省林业厅.吉林省林业厅关于下发使用立木材积表和出材率表的通知(吉林资〔2015〕524号)[A/OL].(2015-12-09)[2025-06-25].. |
| Jilin Provincial Forestry Department.Notice of Jilin Provincial Forestry Department on issuing the volume table and outturn rate table for standing trees(Jilin〔2015〕No.524)[A/OL].(2015-12-09)[2025-06-25].. | |
| [27] | 王云鹏,张蕊,周志春,等.木荷优树自由授粉家系早期生长性状遗传变异动态规律[J].林业科学,2020,56(9):77-86. |
| WANG Y P, ZHANG R, ZHOU Z C,et al.Dynamic patterns of genetic variation in early growth traits of the open-pollinated families of Schima superba plus tree[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2020,56(9):77-86. | |
| [28] | 刘青华.马尾松生长与材性的遗传变异、基因作用方式及环境影响[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2010. |
| LIU Q H.Genetic variation,gene control pattern and environment effect of growth and wood property in Pinus massoniana [D].Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry,2010. | |
| [29] | 张振,张含国,张磊.红松自由授粉子代家系生产力年度变异与家系选择[J].植物研究,2016,36(2):305-309. |
| ZHANG Z, ZHANG H G, ZHANG L.Age variations in productivity and family selection of open-pollinated families of Korean pine(Pinus koraiensis)[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,2016,36(2):305-309. | |
| [30] | 王璧莹,赵曦阳,王洪武,等.依据生长性状对红松半同胞家系的评价选择[J].东北林业大学学报,2019,47(4):8-11. |
| WANG B Y, ZHAO X Y, WANG H W,et al.Variance analysis of growth characteristics of 30 Pinus koraiensis half-sib families[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2019,47(4):8-11. | |
| [31] | 王润辉,韦如萍,晏姝,等.福建杉木家系在广东的多地点生长变异和筛选[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2025,33(3):253-260. |
| WANG R H, WEI R P, YAN S,et al.Multi-site growth variation and selection of Fujian’s Chinese fir families in Guangdong[J].Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany,2025,33(3):253-260. | |
| [32] | 陈兴彬,刘武阳,朱柯帆,等.信丰杉木第3代种子园自由授粉家系遗传变异及早期选择研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2025,45(3):1-6. |
| CHEN X B, LIU W Y, ZHU K F,et al.Genetic variation and early selection of growth traits in open-pollinated progeny of the third generation Cunninghamia lanceolata seed orchard in Xinfeng[J].Journal of Southwest Forestry University(Natural Sciences),2025,45(3):1-6. |
| [1] | 段文标, 王郅臻, 高嘉怡, 陈立新, 付琰芮. 小兴安岭不同演替阶段森林地上凋落物碳密度及碳氮磷计量特征[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(5): 769-782. |
| [2] | 王芳, 杨叶磊, 苑长华, 王君, 魏伟, 吴琳, 李奎友, 李奎全, 陆志民, 王元兴, 杨雨春. 红松优树子代生长变异分析及优良材料选择[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(5): 816-826. |
| [3] | 赵敏, 王峰, 王佳楠, 于淇, 张含国, 张磊. 抗松材线虫病落叶松优良家系选择[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(5): 827-836. |
| [4] | 潘艳艳, 李晓光, 刘立君, 李鸿, 钟鑫, 张义飞. 红松生长和根际土壤酶活性对紫丁香蘑菌剂接种的响应[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(3): 460-470. |
| [5] | 郭文慧, 王越, 吴琳, 杨剑飞, 杨玲, 张鹏, 吴海波, 沈海龙. 外源黄酮对红松胚性愈伤组织增殖和体胚发生的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(1): 130-138. |
| [6] | 张浩, 刘万生, 王彦琦, 陈曦, 穆立蔷. 东北三大硬阔种内和种间竞争关系[J]. 植物研究, 2024, 44(6): 870-878. |
| [7] | 栾宜通, 李念森, 乔璐靖, 琚存勇, 蔡体久, 孙佩丽. 云冷杉红松林优势树种生态位、种间联结及群落稳定性[J]. 植物研究, 2024, 44(5): 753-762. |
| [8] | 王雪来, 刘晓婷, 王力冉, 李诗童, 张太进, 张嘉峰, 许经华, 曲冠证, 赵曦阳. 生长和木材性状耦合评价红松半同胞家系[J]. 植物研究, 2024, 44(4): 554-564. |
| [9] | 曹文昱, 王军辉, 杨艳红, 麻文俊, 李放, 周林召, 熊星月, 胡晓亮, 马贯羊, 赵鲲. 楸树远缘杂交种花器官性状变异分析[J]. 植物研究, 2024, 44(2): 220-231. |
| [10] | 石甜, 莫忠妹, 吴敏, 赵财. 药食同源植物薤白的谱系地理学研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 574-583. |
| [11] | 任毓辉, 聂帅, 彭春雪, 杨玲, 沈海龙. 红松胚性愈伤组织增殖的激素配比、糖源类型和增殖周期效应研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 704-712. |
| [12] | 周雪燕, 王璧莹, 郝雪峰, 胡兴国, 吴江涛, 郎凯, 胡钦波, 赵曦阳. 长白落叶松半同胞家系生长和木材性状遗传变异与联合选择[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(3): 383-393. |
| [13] | 尹一卜, 李吉祥, 郭樱杰, 芦子廷, 肖英, 刘华领, 詹亚光, 曾凡锁. 白蜡属种间杂交子代木质素含量变异及FmPAL核苷酸多态性关联分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(2): 191-199. |
| [14] | 魏志刚, 夏德安, 王瑞琪, 张洋, 刘莹莹, 李若林, 杨传平. 小兴安岭天然次生林不同林型下红松种源试验[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(5): 807-815. |
| [15] | 王芳, 陆志民, 王君, 张世凯, 李峪曦, 李绍臣, 张建秋, 杨雨春. 低温胁迫下红松与西伯利亚红松光合与气孔特性[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(2): 205-212. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||