Bulletin of Botanical Research ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 667-676.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.04.016
• Physiology and Ecology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Huixiao YANG, Fang XU, Xiaohui YANG, Huanqin LIAO, Weihua ZHANG, Wen PAN()
Received:
2021-04-29
Online:
2022-07-20
Published:
2022-07-15
Contact:
Wen PAN
E-mail:Panwen@sinogaf.cn
About author:
YANG Huixiao(1981—),female,senior engineer,doctor,majoring in the research of forest genetics and breeding.
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Huixiao YANG, Fang XU, Xiaohui YANG, Huanqin LIAO, Weihua ZHANG, Wen PAN. Effects of Different Water and Nutrient Treatments on Growth and Biomass Distribution of Eucalyptus urophylla Clones[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 667-676.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://bbr.nefu.edu.cn/EN/10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.04.016
Table 1
Variance analysis of three factors for different traits in E. urophylla clones
性状 Trait | 区组 Block | 水分 Water | 养分 Nutrient | 无性系 Clone | 水分×养分 Water×Nutrient | 水分×无性系 Water×Clone | 养分×无性系 Nutrient×Clone |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树高 Height | 5.95** | 218.76** | 184.21** | 5.34** | 2.74* | 1.08 | 1.43* |
地径 Diameter | 3.52* | 7.47** | 118.31** | 6.74** | 2.26 | 0.86 | 2.42** |
主干鲜质量 Fresh mass of trunk | 0.10 | 129.23*** | 289.86*** | 4.67*** | 4.39** | 0.79 | 2.01*** |
主干干质量 Dry mass of trunk | 0.89 | 113.93*** | 204.18*** | 5.77*** | 5.13*** | 1.03 | 2.03*** |
侧枝鲜质量 Fresh mass of branches | 1.09 | 106.82*** | 775.58*** | 6.33*** | 15.08*** | 1.52** | 1.79*** |
侧枝干质量 Dry mass of branches | 15.93*** | 50.98*** | 156.64*** | 2.12*** | 8.43*** | 0.78 | 0.74 |
根鲜质量 Fresh mass of root | 5.45*** | 231.93*** | 29.05*** | 6.07*** | 15.86*** | 1.26 | 1.27 |
根干质量 Dry mass of root | 5.68** | 202.89*** | 14.30*** | 5.53*** | 13.35*** | 1.13 | 1.48* |
叶鲜质量 Fresh mass of leaves | 6.06** | 1.21 | 42.95*** | 1.06 | 8.62*** | 0.88 | 0.96 |
叶干质量 Dry mass of leaves | 5.07** | 0.19 | 18.41*** | 1.11 | 7.62*** | 0.95 | 0.98 |
总鲜质量 Total fresh mass | 3.53* | 86.86*** | 133.12*** | 1.99** | 3.48* | 1.32 | 1.25 |
总干质量 Total dry mass | 2.66 | 96.50*** | 83.82*** | 1.52* | 4.76*** | 1.37* | 1.10 |
Table 2
Duncan analysis of growth and straightness traits in different treatments for E. urophylla
组合 Combination | 水分 Water | 养分 Nutrient | 树高 Height /cm | 地径 Diameter /mm | 枝下高 Under branch height /cm | 通直度 Straightness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | 1 | 1 | 162.06±31.56d | 29.27±3.75e | 54.63±26.58ab | 3.01±0.81b |
12 | 1 | 2 | 205.28±42.89b | 33.31±4.33d | 48.28±23.88bc | 2.55±0.80c |
13 | 1 | 3 | 217.81±46.83ab | 35.21±4.54c | 47.87±26.51bc | 1.98±0.88e |
21 | 2 | 1 | 177.89±31.20c | 33.21±3.70d | 55.21±30.37ab | 3.39±0.88a |
22 | 2 | 2 | 207.27±41.27b | 39.29±5.07b | 44.19±21.02c | 2.02±0.90e |
23 | 2 | 3 | 227.86±50.14a | 41.91±6.01a | 49.38±25.90bc | 2.07±0.87de |
31 | 3 | 1 | 184.13±31.64c | 36.31±4.01c | 60.77±25.85a | 3.15±1.09ab |
32 | 3 | 2 | 216.08±35.32ab | 42.69±5.08a | 54.83±29.32ab | 2.33±0.95cd |
33 | 3 | 3 | 221.34±51.90a | 43.22±6.62a | 51.64±27.06abc | 1.69±0.72f |
Table 3
Duncan analysis of different biomass in different treatments for E. urophylla clones
水分 Water | 养分 Nutrient | 主干 Trunk | 侧枝 Branches | 根 Root | 叶 Leaves | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜质量 Fresh mass /g | 干质量 Dry mass /g | 鲜质量 Fresh mass /g | 干质量 Dry mass /g | 鲜质量 Fresh mass /g | 干质量 Dry mass /g | 鲜质量 Fresh mass /g | 干质量 Dry mass /g | ||
1 | 1 | 454.53±147.31f | 201.55±71.71e | 177.16±132.81d | 101.82±69.55d | 767.66±290.04e | 395.32±150.35d | 247.62±73.69e | 133.39±45.67c |
1 | 2 | 835.85±284.65cd | 344.31±120.50c | 586.67±247.46c | 283.05±162.15c | 711.54±246.92e | 330.60±119.94e | 516.98±313.06a | 251.27±287.48a |
1 | 3 | 925.71±406.78c | 366.88±183.04c | 663.04±238.03c | 314.37±133.37c | 710.09±315.45e | 321.39±153.90e | 470.63±227.44ab | 232.17±117.58ab |
2 | 1 | 650.47±184.73e | 272.19±73.87d | 203.47±97.21d | 175.34±160.62d | 1063.92±428.07d | 554.60±199.16c | 331.82±89.26d | 178.64±55.20c |
2 | 2 | 1146.55±369.40b | 465.35±171.10b | 832.73±214.44b | 631.99±426.38a | 1334.63±427.86bc | 625.94±180.47b | 444.61±193.89bc | 231.88±103.69ab |
2 | 3 | 1364.43±448.12a | 558.18±203.44a | 894.07±294.84b | 499.81±294.37b | 1172.03±484.37d | 541.80±224.93c | 515.83±228.25a | 263.64±136.19a |
3 | 1 | 759.31±242.47d | 315.15±91.82cd | 247.70±101.62d | 134.40±57.35d | 1200.94±384.86cd | 585.69±188.47bc | 374.66±136.91d | 221.02±165.01bc |
3 | 2 | 1350.14±348.71a | 566.02±179.50a | 981.13±316.69a | 500.14±270.07b | 1802.54±636.37a | 800.59±272.20a | 391.12±197.86cd | 211.85±104.77bc |
3 | 3 | 1442.74±477.12a | 579.63±211.22a | 1035.44±363.85a | 526.8±265.74b | 1469.31±511.07b | 632.48±233.67b | 441.54±269.09bc | 233.97±126.91ab |
Table 4
Correlation coefficient among different traits of E. urophylla
性状 Traits | 地径 Diameter | 树高 Height | 主干鲜质量 Fresh mass of trunk | 主干干质量 Dry mass of trunk | 侧枝鲜质量 Fresh mass of branches | 侧枝干质量 Dry mass of branches | 根鲜质量 Fresh mass of root | 根干质量 Dry mass of root | 叶鲜质量 Fresh mass of leaves | 叶干质量 Dry mass of leaves | 总鲜质量 Total fresh mass |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
树高 Height | 0.383 | 0.724 | 0.705 | 0.390 | 0.259 | 0.170 | 0.106 | 0.154 | 0.125 | 0.515 | 0.438 |
地径 Diameter | 0.682 | 0.664 | 0.630 | 0.443 | 0.514 | 0.441 | 0.259 | 0.261 | 0.750 | 0.678 | |
主干鲜质量 Fresh mass of trunk | <0.01 | 0.969 | 0.630 | 0.484 | 0.470 | 0.397 | 0.261 | 0.254 | 0.856 | 0.784 | |
主干干质量 Dry mass of trunk | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.600 | 0.455 | 0.447 | 0.396 | 0.258 | 0.253 | 0.822 | 0.780 | |
侧枝鲜质量 Fresh mass of branches | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.700 | 0.340 | 0.250 | 0.316 | 0.286 | 0.782 | 0.708 | |
侧枝干质量 Dry mass of branches | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.286 | 0.219 | 0.125 | 0.116 | 0.569 | 0.766 | |
根鲜质量 Fresh mass of root | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.933 | 0.057 | 0.095 | 0.760 | 0.702 | |
根干质量 Dry mass of root | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.082 | 0.131 | 0.675 | 0.686 | |
叶鲜质量 Fresh mass of leaves | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 | ns | <0.05 | 0.944 | 0.389 | 0.346 | |
叶干质量 Dry mass of leaves | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.05 | <0.05 | <0.011 | <0.01 | 0.385 | 0.370 | |
总鲜质量 Total fresh mass | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.915 | |
总干质量 Total dry mass | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Table 5
Genetic parameter estimation of E. urophylla clones
性状Traits | 区组 Block | 无性系 Clone | 养分×无性系 Nutrient×Clone | 水分×无性系 Water×Clone | 环境方差 Environment | 重复力±标准误 Repeatability±SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地径Diameter | 0.200 | 4.280** | 1.050* | 0.260 | 18.98*** | 0.15±0.04 |
树高 Height | 26.470 | 259.540** | 235.450*** | — | 1 174.09*** | 0.15±0.05 |
主干鲜质量Fresh mass of trunk | 0.010 | 12 607.300** | 12 212.500** | 0.010 | 89 548.30*** | 0.15±0.04 |
主干干质量Dry mass of trunk | 0.001 | 3 874.440** | 2 628.200** | 0.001 | 16 792.50*** | 0.17±0.05 |
侧枝鲜质量Fresh mass of branches | 66.500 | 7 732.140** | 4 270.660** | 2 650.450* | 42 291.60*** | 0.15±0.04 |
侧枝干质量Dry mass of branches | 2 995.340 | 2 817.860** | 0.001 | 0.010 | 50 151.30*** | 0.05±0.02 |
根鲜质量Fresh mass of root | 2 877.620 | 31 255.800** | 5 276.480 | 4 885.650 | 139 462.00*** | 0.17±0.05 |
根干质量Dry mass of root | 587.320 | 6 261.050** | 1 760.410* | 634.870 | 29 756.10*** | 0.16±0.04 |
叶鲜质量Fresh mass of leaves | 755.810 | 120.200 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 41 470.90*** | — |
叶干质量Dry mass of leaves | 62.780 | 32.560 | 201.760 | 0.003 | 20 617.20*** | — |
总鲜质量Total fresh mass | 12 421.700 | 24 897.500 | 22 119.200 | 36 701.700 | 1 030 170.00*** | — |
总干质量Total dry mass | 2 155.100 | 1 466.790 | 2 431.570 | 11 029.400 | 261 375.00 | — |
Table 6
Selection of superior clones of E. urophylla under different treatments
编号 No. | 无性系 Clone | 基因型值Gv | 水分 Water | 养分 Nutrient | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基因型值1 Gv 1 | 基因型值2 Gv 2 | 基因型值3 Gv 3 | 基因型值1 Gv 1 | 基因型值2 Gv 2 | 基因型值3 Gv 3 | |||
13 | ZQUA3 | 25.97 | -3.98 | 123.10 | 80.05 | 3.87 | 13.90 | 22.80 |
20 | ZQUA88 | 20.93 | 12.41 | 120.10 | 27.93 | 9.53 | 4.76 | 18.41 |
1 | UD42 | 14.18 | -15.39 | 39.87 | 84.25 | -3.08 | 3.44 | 21.80 |
8 | LDUC1 | 11.81 | 3.46 | 31.49 | 55.60 | 16.76 | 1.32 | 0.38 |
6 | 3229 | 10.43 | -9.01 | 54.30 | 34.71 | 6.45 | -3.92 | 13.78 |
30 | ZQUD14 | 9.58 | -20.79 | 93.87 | 0.41 | 1.66 | 21.47 | -8.16 |
27 | ZQUA27 | 8.66 | 18.24 | -63.46 | 111.70 | -2.97 | -3.11 | 19.62 |
16 | LDUD5 | 6.63 | 7.76 | 67.96 | -24.91 | 1.45 | 5.76 | 3.14 |
3 | LDUD17 | 6.04 | 11.30 | -6.33 | 41.33 | -4.92 | 9.42 | 4.94 |
23 | ZQUC86 | 6.03 | 36.33 | -27.49 | 37.38 | -13.29 | 32.32 | -9.62 |
32 | UA120 | 4.37 | 2.26 | 31.28 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 6.37 |
28 | ZQUC23 | 3.85 | 49.04 | -28.73 | 9.20 | -10.00 | -9.37 | 25.38 |
5 | ZQUB93 | 3.45 | -45.37 | 28.55 | 43.29 | -3.36 | -11.33 | 20.08 |
2 | ZQUC14 | 3.07 | 105.40 | -22.05 | -59.81 | 8.83 | 10.82 | -14.86 |
21 | ZQUB39 | 0.55 | 31.78 | 10.92 | -38.50 | 2.80 | 6.02 | -7.96 |
10 | ZQUB55 | -0.27 | -30.60 | 71.02 | -42.48 | 5.38 | -11.65 | 5.86 |
24 | LDUB94 | -0.96 | -18.81 | 21.07 | -9.62 | -1.87 | 7.65 | -7.28 |
34 | LDUC93 | -1.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -11.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -2.37 |
12 | LDUB41 | -2.14 | -20.79 | -18.31 | 22.71 | -2.47 | 7.17 | -8.03 |
33 | ZQUC17 | -2.37 | 13.43 | -31.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -3.71 |
29 | ZQUC97 | -2.49 | -29.28 | 40.47 | -30.30 | 7.60 | -12.78 | 1.29 |
7 | ZQUC29 | -2.69 | -38.74 | 14.44 | 3.67 | 7.71 | -3.17 | -8.74 |
4 | ZQUB58 | -2.69 | 9.71 | -11.06 | -19.30 | -3.71 | -5.49 | 4.99 |
9 | ZQUA13 | -3.04 | -21.27 | -76.85 | 74.77 | -8.09 | -1.71 | 5.04 |
19 | 广林9 | -3.56 | -1.50 | -34.16 | 8.36 | 3.10 | 5.10 | -13.77 |
26 | ZQUA29 | -7.82 | 6.30 | 34.49 | -100.80 | 14.93 | -17.09 | -10.06 |
14 | ZQUB16 | -7.89 | -37.86 | -10.50 | -12.18 | -2.77 | -2.76 | -6.81 |
22 | ZQUB78 | -8.55 | -47.44 | -60.27 | 42.13 | -7.54 | -5.83 | 0.00 |
17 | ZQUB28 | -9.17 | 16.89 | -20.67 | -66.51 | -2.02 | 0.81 | -13.12 |
31 | ZQUC44 | -9.49 | 17.96 | -83.57 | -7.18 | 5.23 | 0.30 | -20.36 |
11 | ZQUA22 | -11.23 | 34.01 | -36.47 | -83.64 | 0.13 | 3.80 | -21.47 |
18 | LDUD26 | -16.11 | -12.56 | -119.30 | 8.31 | -1.00 | -17.61 | -6.56 |
25 | LDUD17 | -17.67 | -3.45 | -100.60 | -31.48 | -27.67 | -9.11 | 9.17 |
15 | ZQUA28 | -25.88 | -19.48 | -31.55 | -147.50 | -1.13 | -19.12 | -20.18 |
Appendix 1 Experiment design of water and nutrient for E. urophylla
水分处理 Water treatment | 土壤相对含水量(t) Soil relative water content /% | 养分处理 Nutrient treatment | 基肥 /盆 Basal fertilizer /pot | 追肥 /盆 Top dressing /pot | 追肥时间 Time of addition fertilize |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20<t≤40 | 1 | 钙镁磷肥250 g Calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer 250 g | — | — |
2 | 40<t≤60 | 2 | 钙镁磷肥250 g Calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer 250 g | 复合肥150 g Compound fertilizer 150 g | 第二年2月 Feb. of the second year |
3 | 60<t≤80 | 3 | 钙镁磷肥250 g+复合肥150 g Calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer 250 g + compound fertilizer 150 g | 尿素100 g+复合肥150 g Urea 100 g+compound fertilizer 150 g | 当年8月及第二年2月 Aug. of the current year and Feb. of the next year |
1 | GOWER S T, VOGT K A, GRIER C C.Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir:influence of water and nutrient availability[J].Ecological Monographs,1992,62(1):43-65. |
2 | BECKER M, NIEMINEN T M, GÉRÉMIA F.Short-term variations and long-term changes in oak productivity in northeastern France.The role of climate and atmospheric CO2 [J].Annales Des Sciences Forestieres,1994,51(5):477-492. |
3 | 王海艺,韩烈保,杨永利,等.水肥对洋白蜡生物量的耦合效应研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(S1):64-68. |
WANG H Y, HAN L B, YANG Y L,et al.Coupling effects of water and fertilizer on the biomass of Fraxinus pennsylvanica [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2006,28(S1):64-68. | |
4 | 华元刚,陈秋波,林钊沐,等.水肥耦合对橡胶树产胶量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(6):1211-1216. |
HUA Y G, CHEN Q B, LIN Z M,et al.Coupling effects of water and chemical fertilizers on Hevea brasiliensis latex yield[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2008,19(6):1211-1216. | |
5 | 王楠,王宏信,李向林,等.施肥对降香黄檀幼苗生长和光合的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2017,45(1):25-29. |
WANG N, WANG H X, LI X L,et al.Effect of fertilization on growth and photosynthesis of Dalbergia odorifera seedlings[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2017,45(1):25-29. | |
6 | 黄毅.不同生境对木荷幼苗生长及幼树生物量分配的影响[J].林业勘察设计,2018,38(1):30-32. |
HUANG Y.The influence on seedling growth and young trees biomass allocation of Schima superb in different habitats[J].Forestry Prospect and Design,2018,38(1):30-32. | |
7 | 邹松言,李豆豆,汪金松,等.毛白杨幼林细根对梯度土壤水分的响应[J].林业科学,2019,55(10):124-137. |
ZOU S Y, LI D D, WANG J S,et al.Response of fine roots to soil moisture of different gradients in young Populus tomentosa plantation[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2019,55(10):124-137. | |
8 | LI J S, LIU Y C.Water and nitrate distributions as affected by layered-textural soil and buried dripline depth under subsurface drip fertigation[J].Irrigation Science,2011,29(6):469-478. |
9 | 刘峰,席本野,戴腾飞,等.水肥耦合对毛白杨林分土壤氮、细根分布及生物量的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2020,42(1):75-83. |
LIU F, XI B Y, DAI T F,et al.Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on soil nitrogen,fine root distribution and biomass of Populus tomentosa[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2020,42(1):75-83. | |
10 | 杨会肖,曹彦斌,廖焕琴,等.水肥胁迫对尾叶桉无性系生长及叶片变异的影响研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2017,25(3):218-224. |
YANG H X, CAO Y B, LIAO H Q,et al.Effects of water and nutrient stresses on growth and leaf variation of Eucalyptus urophylla clones[J].Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany,2017,25(3):218-224. | |
11 | 廖焕琴,张卫华,张方秋,等.红锥1.5代改良种子园无性系生长和形质性状变异分析[J].林业与环境科学,2016,32(4):23-27. |
LIAO H Q, ZHANG W H, ZHANG F Q,et al.Analysis on variation of clonal growth and form traits for 1.5 generation improved seed orchard of Castanopsis hystrix [J].Forestry and Environmental Science,2016,32(4):23-27. | |
12 | 杨会肖,廖焕琴,杨晓慧,等.阳江地区尾叶桉早期生长性状遗传参数估算[J].华南农业大学学报,2021,42(1):109-115. |
YANG H X, LIAO H Q, YANG X H,et al.Estimation for genetic parameters of early growth traits of Eucalyptus urophylla in Yangjiang[J].Journal of South China Agricultural University,2021,42(1):109-115. | |
13 | GILMOUR A R,GOGEL R,CULLIS B R, et al.ASReml user guide release 3.0[Z].Hemel Hempstead:VSN International Ltd,2009. |
14 | SANTIAGO L S, WRIGHT S J, HARMS K E,et al.Tropical tree seedling growth responses to nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium addition[J].Journal of Ecology,2012,100(2):309-316. |
15 | WRIGHT S J, YAVITT J B, WURZBURGER N,et al.Potassium,phosphorus,or nitrogen limit root allocation,tree growth,or litter production in a lowland tropical forest[J].Ecology,2011,92(8):1616-1625. |
16 | 李典云,秦紫棋,谭翔,等.不同施肥处理对尾巨桉生长量及经济效益的影响[J].热带农业科学,2017,37(3):20-24. |
LI D Y, QIN Z Q, TAN X,et al.Effects of different fertilizer treatments on the growth rate and economic benefit of Eucalyptus urophyra × E.grandis [J].Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture,2017,37(3):20-24. | |
17 | 韦昌鹏.桉树人工林经营措施对生态环境的影响及对策[J].现代农业科技,2020(13):130,132. |
WEI C P.Effects of Eucalyptus plantation management measures on ecological environment and Countermeasures[J].Modern Agricultural Science and Technology,2020(13):130,132. | |
18 | 席本野,王烨,贾黎明.滴灌施肥下施氮量和施氮频率对毛白杨生物量及氮吸收的影响[J].林业科学,2017,53(5):63-73. |
XI B Y, WANG Y, JIA L M.Effects of nitrogen application rate and frequency on biomass accumulation and nitrogen uptake of Populus tomentosa under drip fertigation[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2017,53(5):63-73. | |
19 | 李国升.不同林分密度对日本落叶松生物量的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2017,45(15):162-163,170. |
LI G S.Effects of different stand density on biomass of Larix kaempferi [J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2017,45(15):162-163,170. | |
20 | 卢万鸿,齐杰,李鹏,等.桉树无性系生长性状的基因型与环境互作初步研究[J].桉树科技,2018,35(2):7-13. |
LU W H, QI J, LI P,et al.Preliminary study of genotype by environment interactions in the growth traits of eucalypt clones[J].Eucalypt Science & Techonology,2018,35(2):7-13. | |
21 | 张明月,黄相玲,朱栗琼,等.不同施肥配比对罗汉松幼苗生长的影响[J].广西林业科学,2018,47(3):285-289. |
ZHANG M Y, HUANG X L, ZHU L Q,et al.Effects of different fertilization proportions on growth of Podocarpus macrophyllus seedlings[J].Guangxi Forestry Science,2018,47(3):285-289. | |
22 | 王力,邵明安,侯庆春,等.不同水肥条件对杨树生物量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004(3):53-58. |
WANG L, SHAO M A, HOU Q C,et al.Effect of different water,N and P content on the bio-mass of poplar[J].Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry(Natural Science Edition),2004(3):53-58. | |
23 | 董雯怡.毛白杨苗期水肥耦合效应研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2011. |
DONG W Y.Study on coupling effects of water and fertilizer on Populus tomentosa seedlings[D].Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2011. | |
24 | 董雷鸣,张守攻,孙晓梅.日本落叶松全双列交配生长性状的遗传分析[J].林业科学研究,2019,32(4):11-18. |
DONG L M, ZHANG S G, SUN X M.Genetic analysis of Larix kaempferi growth traits in full-diallel crosses[J].Forest Research,2019,32(4):11-18. | |
25 | 欧阳芳群,祁生秀,蔡启山,等.青海云杉自由授粉家系遗传评价与选择[J].林业科学研究,2018,31(6):26-32. |
OUYANG F Q, QI S X, CAI Q S,et al.Genetic evaluation and selection on open-pollinated families of Picea crassifolia Kom.[J].Forest Research,2018,31(6):26-32. | |
26 | 舒伟林.亚美马褂木速生无性系选择与生长规律研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2018. |
SHU W L.Fast-growing clone selection and growth rhythm of Liriodendrom sino-americanum [D].Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University,2018. | |
27 | KROON J, ERICSSON T, JANSSON G,et al.Patterns of genetic parameters for height in field genetic tests of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden[J].Tree Genetics & Genomes,2011,7(6):1099-1111. |
[1] | Jiaxing CHEN, Shu WANG, Linli CHEN, Xiali HOU, Qingzhu YANG, Renya YIN. Effects of Drought Conditions on Interspecific Interactions and Growth of Bidens pilosa and Buddleja lindleyana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(5): 720-728. |
[2] | Jikang XU, Yanhong HE, Tingyan LIU, Longfei HAO, Shengxi ZHANG, Zhaoyi LI. Characteristics of Rhizosphere Soil Microecological Environment of Different Ecological Restoration Vegetation in Arsenic Sandstone Areas [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 531-539. |
[3] | Sheng ZHENG, Haixia GAO, Min SU, Shanghuan LU, Tengguo ZHANG, Guofan WU. Exogenous Sucrose Affected AtKEA1 and AtKEA2 to Regulate Root Growth of Seedling in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 562-571. |
[4] | Li CAO, Yunli YANG, Tianfang LI, Jing JIANG. Analysis on Leaf Color and Growth Variation of Transgenic BpGLK Betula pendula ‘Dalecarlica' [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(3): 351-360. |
[5] | Yingying TANG, Chuanchao GUO, Dang SHI, Nanlin JIANG, Zheng XU, Liqiang LIU. Effects of Pulp and Buried Depth on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Armeniaca vulgaris [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 251-260. |
[6] | Kenian LINGHU, Shu WANG. Responses of Biomass Allocation to Population Density and Soil Water in Abutilon theophrasti at Different Growth Stages [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 272-280. |
[7] | Jun SUN, Guisheng LI. Sequencing and Analysis of miRNAs in Vegetative and Reproductive Growths of Ceratopteris pteridoides [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(6): 1014-1022. |
[8] | Ying LIU, Jiayi WU, Ling JIN, Qianru JI, Yujie FU, Dewen LI. Effects of Exogenous NO on Soil Nutrient Content and Seedling Growth Characteristics from Potted Catharanthus roseus under Light-shading Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(6): 1088-1095. |
[9] | Xiaolu CAO, Qiaozhu ZHAO, Hua XING, Mengfei LI. Anatomical Structure of Seed and Morphological Character at Different Germination Stages of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 746-752. |
[10] | Huan WANG, Yunfei XU, Yibo LIU, Qinsong LIU, Wenjuan XU, Yun LONG, Xiao XU. Allelopathic Effects on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Brassica pekinensi, Caused by Water Extracts of Branches and Leaves from Davidia involucrata and Bothrocaryum controversum [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 866-875. |
[11] | Weiwei ZHUANG, Mingming WANG. Comparative Analysis of Nutrient Elements of Eight Herbaceous Plants in Desert Area [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 896-909. |
[12] | Shubing BAI, Xiaoyi XING, Wenyu GUAN, Li DONG. Effects of Shouyun Iron Mine Abandoned Soil on the Growth of Two Sedum Species [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 677-687. |
[13] | Qingqing ZHANG, Zaizhi ZHOU, Guihua HUANG, Weiwei ZHAO, Xiyang WANG, Guang YANG, Gaofeng LIU. Effects of Fertilizing on Trees Growth and Understory Vegetation of Young Teak Plantation [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 694-703. |
[14] | Xueyan ZHOU, Biying WANG, Xuefeng HAO, Xinguo HU, Jiangtao WU, Kai LANG, Qinbo HU, Xiyang ZHAO. Genetic Variation and Joint Selection of Growth and Wood Traits in Half-sib Families of Larix olgensis [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(3): 383-393. |
[15] | Dandan Zhang, Xiang Li, Biying Wang, Xihe Wang, Quan Sun, Yunyang Wu, Pingyang Li, Deyao Li, Yulei Li, Xiyang Zhao. Variation Analysis of Growth Traits of Larix olgensis Parental Clones in Seed Orchards [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(1): 130-137. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||