Effects of Nutrient Supply on Growth Dynamics and Nutrient Allocation of Poplars

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.05.007

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the effects of different nutrient additions on the growth and nutrient content of Populus euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis， Populus simonii × Populus nigra and Populus ussuriensis， and to reveal the nutrient demand and utilization rules of poplar， and to provide a reference for nursery cultivation of poplar seedlings， P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis， Populus simonii × Populus nigra and Populus ussuriensis were used as materials， 3 factors（N： nitrogen， P： phosphorus， K： potassium） and 3 levels（N： 1.5， 3， 6g； P： 0.75， 1.5， 3g； K： 0.5， 1， 2g， for per plant respectively.） L₉（3⁴） orthogonal experimental design were uesd， plants with no fertilization as control， and the effects of different nutrient supply levels on the growth dynamics and nutrient distribution of different poplars were studied respectively. The results showed that：①Different nutrient supply had significant effects on the growth of seedling height and ground diameter of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis， Populus simonii × Populus nigra and Populus ussuriensis from the middle of July. The height and base diameter growth index of three tree species was the highest at NPK 1 level respectively. The biomass of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis was the highest when N， P and K was selected at 3， 1 and 2 level respectively. The biomass of Populus simonii × Populus nigra was the highest when N， P and K level was 2， 1， 1， respectively. The biomass of Populus ussuriensis was the highest when N， P and K level was 1， respectively. The effects of N， P and K on the growth indexes of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis and Populus simonii × Populus nigra was N>P and K， while the effects of N， P and K on the growth indexes of Populus ussuriensis was K>N and P. ②The accumulation of nitrogen， phosphorus and potassium in roots， stems and leaves of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis， Populus simonii × Populus nigra and Populus ussuriensis was N>P， K. The accumulation of nitrogen in each organ of the 3 varieties was greater than that of phosphorus and potassium. Among the 3 poplar varieties， the accumulation of 3 kinds of nutrients in each organ was significantly different. The distribution ratio of total nitrogen accumulation in 3 varieties was stem>leaf>root. The distribution ratio of phosphorus accumulation of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis and Populus simonii × Populus nigra was stem>leaf>root. The order of Populus ussuriensis was leaf>stem>root. The distribution of potassium accumulation of P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis and Populus ussuriensis was leaf>stem>root. The distribution of potassium accumulation of Populus simonii × Populus nigra was higher than that of stem>leaf>root. ③Through the comprehensive analysis of each index， it was concluded that the optimal fertilization scheme of Populus ussuriensis， P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis and Populus simonii × Populus nigra was N₁P₁K₁， that was， N 1.5 g， P 0.75 g， K 0.5 g， for per plant respectively.

Key words: seedling height, base diameter, biomass, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium

CLC Number:

S792.11

Guo-Yu SUN, Xiao-Yu MA, Jia-Xin YI, Fang-Ping ZHANG, Chun-Hua ZHANG, Kai-Long LI. Effects of Nutrient Supply on Growth Dynamics and Nutrient Allocation of Poplars[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(5): 690-699.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Effects of different nutrient supply on seedling height，base diameter and biomass of P. euramericana“N3016”× P. ussuriensis，P. simonii × P. nigra，P. ussuriensis

树种 Tree species	处理组 Treatment group	苗高 Seedling height （cm）	地径 Base diameter （mm）	根生物量 Biomass of root（g）	茎生物量 Biomass of stem（g）	叶生物量 Biomass of leaf（g）	全株生物量 Biomass of whole plant（g）
黑青杨 P.euramericana“N3016”× P. ussuriensis	CK	77.0±29.6b	3.8±0.9b	1.2±0.1c	6.7±0.3c	4. 0±0.2c	11.9±0.6b
	N₁	115.7±24.4a	4.9±1.2a	1.9±0.7b	18.5±1.4b	4.9±0.6b	25.4±2.2a
	N₂	114.1±26.9a	5.4±1.0a	2.6±0.5a	19.8±6.4b	7.5±2.8a	29.9±9.4a
	N₃	117.3±32.3a	4.8±1.0a	2.5±0.3a	21.3±5.4a	8.2±2.0a	32.0±7.5a
	极差Range	40.3	1.6	1.4	14.6	4.2	20.1
	CK	77.0±29.6b	3.8±0.9b	1.2±0.1c	6.7±0.3c	4.0±0.2d	11.9±0.6c
	P₁	118.9±26.4a	5.2±1.1a	2.8±0.2a	24.1±3.5a	8.1±2.5a	35.0±5.9a
	P₂	115.9±26.5a	4.7±1.2a	2.2±0.6b	18.0±2.9b	7.0±2.0b	27.2±4.8b
	P₃	112.3±29.9a	5.1±0.9a	2.0±0.5b	17.5±5.1b	5.5±2.1c	25.0±7.4b
	极差Range	41.9	1.4	1.6	17.4	4.1	23.1
	CK	77.0±29.6b	3.8±0.9b	1.2±0.1b	6.7±0.3d	4.0±0.2c	11.9±0.6c
	K₁	118.9±23.5a	5.4±1.2a	2.3±0.4a	15.3±3.4c	4.9±1.0b	22.5±4.1b
	K₂	125.9±30.8a	5.0±1.1a	2.3±0.6a	23.1±3.3a	7.6±1.7a	33.0±5.5a
	K₃	102.3±22.5a	4.7±0.7ab	2.4±0.7a	21.2±4.0b	8.2±2.9a	31.7±7.3a
	极差Range	48.9	1.6	1.2	16.4	4.2	21.1
小黑杨 P. simonii ×P. nigra	CK	82.8±15.0b	4.1±1.5b	2.3±0..1b	9.6±0.3c	4.5±0.1c	16.4±0.5c
	N₁	112.0±26.4a	4.9±1.0ab	2.6±0.7b	16.9±2.3b	5.6±0.8b	25.1±3.1b
	N₂	106.2±18.9a	5.3±1.4a	4.1±0.4a	24.2±5.8a	6.9±0.3a	35.2±6.4a
	N₃	101.5±20.0ab	4.0±0.7b	2.4±1.2b	17.8±4.2b	5.5±0.5b	25.7±5.5b
	极差Range	29.2	1.3	1.8	14.6	2.4	18.8
	CK	82.8±15.0b	4.1±1.5a	2.3±0.1b	9.6±0.3b	4.5±0.1b	16.4±0.5b
	P₁	109.9±23.2a	4.5±1.0a	3.4±0.2a	17.7±2.3a	6.3±0.3a	27.4±2.7a
	P₂	107.9±19.6a	4.8±1.3a	2.8±1.6ab	21.4±8.3a	6.1±0.9a	30.3±10.8a
	P₃	100.6±23.7ab	4.8±1.3a	3.0±1.1ab	19.7±3.0a	5.6±1.1ab	28.3±4.8a
	极差Range	27.1	0.7	1.1	11.8	1.8	13.9
	CK	82.8±15.0b	4.1±1.5a	2.3±0.1a	9.6±0.3c	4.5±0.1b	16.4±0.5b
	K₁	107.0±23.5a	5.0±1.3a	2.7±1.5a	16.3±3.7b	6.0±0.9a	25.1±5.8a
	K₂	116.4±19.0a	4.5±0.9a	3.3±0.3a	20.6±1.5a	6.1±0.5a	30.0±1.4a
	K₃	96.4±19.9ab	4.6±1.4a	3.2±1.3a	21.9±7.5a	5.9±1.2a	31.0±9.7a
	极差Range	33.6	0.9	1.0	12.3	1.6	14.6
大青杨 P. ussuriensis	CK	78.4±30.0b	3.2±0.8b	1.5±0.4c	6.6±0.3c	3.8±0.4c	11.8±0.5b
	N₁	131.7±33.3a	5.1±1.4a	4.4±1.9a	27.7±7.3a	12.2±3.9a	44.2±12.4a
	N₂	132.3±27.6a	5.2±1.0a	4.4±2.0a	26.5±2.5ab	9.8±0.7a	40.6±4.5a
	N₃	121.7±33.1a	4.5±0.9a	3.7±0.9b	24.9±3.7ab	11.7±.2.2ab	40.2±6.2a
	极差Range	53.9	2.0	2.9	21.1	8.4	32.4
	CK	78.4±30.0b	3.2±0.8b	1.5±0.4c	6.6±0.3b	3.8±0.4c	11.8±0.5b
	P₁	131.7±32.6a	4.8±1.3a	4.7±1.7a	26.8±3.9a	12.2±2.6a	43.7±8.0a
	P₂	132.3±31.1a	5.3±1.1a	3.3±0.7a	27.1±5.6a	10.8±2.5b	41.1±8.3a
	P₃	121.7±30.8a	4.7±0.9a	4.3±2.0ab	25.2±5.3a	10.6±3.0b	40.1±9.2a
	极差Range	53.9	2.1	3.2	20.5	8.4	31.9
	CK	78.4±30.0b	3.2±0.8b	1.5±0.4c	6.6±0.3b	3.8±0.4c	11.8±0.5b
	K₁	117.1±36.3a	5.1±1.1a	5.4±2.1a	26.9±5.0a	11.8±2.8a	44.1±9.2a
	K₂	136.2±28.8a	5.0±1.2a	3.5±0.6b	28.7±4.4a	12.4±2.4a	44.6±7.0a
	K₃	132.1±26.0a	4.7±1.1a	3.4±1.1b	23.5±4.2a	9.4±2.1b	36.3±6.5a
	极差Range	57.8	1.9	3.5	22.1	8.6	32.8

Table 2

Table 3

Effects of different nutrient supply on nutrient accumulation and distribution in roots and leaves of P. euramericana“N3016”× P. ussuriensis，P. simonii × P. nigra，P. ussuriensis

树种 Tree species	处理组 Treatment group	根Root		茎Stem		叶Leaf		N/P/K生物量收获指数 Biomass harvest index（%）	N/P/K收获指数 Nutrient harvest index（%）	苗木质量指数 Seedling quality index
树种 Tree species	处理组 Treatment group	N/P/K积累量 N/P/K accumulation （mg）	N/P/K分配率 N/P/K distribution rate （%）	N/P/K积累量 N/P/K accumulation （mg）	N/P/K分配率 N/P/K distribution rate （%）	N/P/K积累量 N/P/K accumulation （mg）	N/P/K分配率 N/P/K distribution rate （%）	N/P/K生物量收获指数 Biomass harvest index（%）	N/P/K收获指数 Nutrient harvest index（%）	苗木质量指数 Seedling quality index
黑青杨 P. euramericana “N3016” × P. ussuriensis	Ck	7.5b	12.2	24.3c	39.3	30.0c	48.4	—	—	0.6b
	N₁	10.6b	7.3	76.5b	51.0	61.7bc	41.7	2.8a	9.9a	0.9a
	N₂	20.6a	9.5	101.5ab	43.4	123.2a	47.1	1.7b	8.2b	1.2a
	N₃	19.9a	8.6	123.9a	51.0	98.2ab	40.3	0.9c	4.0c	1.2a
	极差Range	13.1	—	99.6	—	93.2	—	1.9	5.9	0.6
	CK	4.7b	15.3	16.3b	53.6	9.5b	31.1	—	—	0.6c
	P₁	8.6a	10.9	45.4a	56.0	26.7a	33.2	7.8a	10.8a	1.3a
	P₂	9.7a	12.1	40.5a	51.8	29.5a	36.1	3.0b	5.3b	1.1b
	P₃	9.8a	14.2	39.6a	54.6	22.6a	31.2	1.4c	2.4c	0.9bc
	极差Range	5.1	—	29.1	—	20.0	—	6.4	8.4	0.4
	CK	0.9b	5.2	3.4c	20.7	12.4b	74.1	—	—	0.6c
	K₁	2.4a	8.0	10.5b	34.0	18.1b	57.9	7.5a	6.2a	0.9bc
	K₂	2.8a	5.5	16.6a	32.9	30.9a	61.7	5.5b	5.0b	1.1ab
	K₃	3.4a	5.5	19.2a	32.7	37.5a	61.7	2.6c	3.0c	1.3a
	极差Range	2.5	—	15.8	—	25.1	—	4.9	3.2	0.7
小黑杨 P. simonii × P. nigra	Ck	8.1c	12.3	27.9c	42.5	29.2c	45.3	—	—	0.8b
	N₁	11.1bc	11.1	45.9bc	46.0	42.2b	42.9	2.8a	6.6a	1.0b
	N₂	27.6a	14.8	109.0a	53.4	60.2a	31.8	2.0b	6.6a	1.5a
	N₃	17.8b	11.5	80.2ab	55.6	44.9b	32.9	0.7c	2.4b	0.9b
	极差Range	19.5	—	81.1	—	31	—	2.1	4.2	0.7
	CK	6.8b	23.4	10.1c	34.7	12.2b	41.9	—	—	0.8a
	P₁	12.3ab	20.1	30.5b	49.7	18.7bc	30.1	6.1a	8.2a	1.1a
	P₂	12.8ab	14.5	45.9a	59.3	20.4a	26.2	3.4b	5.2b	1.1a
	P₃	14.3a	18.2	39.2ab	51.0	23.5a	30.8	1.6c	2.6c	1.2a
	极差Range	7.5	—	5.8	—	11.3	—	4.5	5.6	0.4
	CK	2.3b	10.0	8.2c	36.0	12.3b	53.9	—	—	0.8b
	K₁	3.2ab	6.8	19.9b	43.9	21.8a	49.3	8.4a	9.0a	1.0ab
	K₂	3.6ab	7.6	24.4ab	51.4	19.4a	40.9	5.0b	4.7b	1.1ab
	K₃	4.5a	7.5	31.7a	52.6	22.7a	39.9	2.6c	3.0c	1.2a
	极差Range	2.2	—	16.2	—	10.4	—	5.8	6.0	0.4
大青杨 P. ussuriensis	Ck	3.5b	12.5	14.3b	49.1	11.5b	38.4	—	—	0.6b
	N₁	16.5a	10.5	84.0a	54.5	51.6a	35.0	4.9a	10.2a	1.7a
	N₂	21.5a	10.8	86.3a	44.2	84.5a	45.0	2.3b	6.4b	1.5a
	N₃	20.2a	10.5	101.0a	50.9	85.8a	38.6	1.1a	3.5c	1.5a
	极差Range	18.0	—	86.7	—	74.3	—	3.8	6.7	0.2
	CK	3.8c	13.7	8.2b	29.8	15.9b	56.6	—	—	0.6b
	P₁	9.8b	11.9	33.9a	41.1	39.4a	47.1	9.7a	17.0a	1.8a
	P₂	10.1a	11.6	40.0a	45.2	37.5a	43.2	4.6b	8.0b	1.4a
	P₃	16.1a	16.6	38.1a	38.4	45.2a	45.0	2.2c	3.9c	1.5a
	极差Range	12.3	—	31.8	—	29.3	—	7.5	13.1	0.3
	CK	1.1b	6.6	4.1b	24.4	11.7b	69.0	—	—	0.6c
	K₁	5.9a	6.7	28.5a	33.5	50.3a	59.8	14.7a	17.0a	1.9a
	K₂	4.0a	5.0	29.0a	36.2	47.5a	58.8	7.4b	8.0b	1.5b
	K₃	5.1a	6.5	31.2a	40.5	41.2a	53.0	3.0c	3.9c	1.3b
	极差Range	4.8	—	27.1	—	38.6	—	11.7	13.1	0.6

Table 3

References 19

1	王福森，李晶，李树森，等.黑青杨选育［J］.东北林业大学学报，2014，42（7）：11-15，23.
	Wang F S，Li J，Li S S，et al.Breeding of Populus euramericana “N3016” × Populus ussuriensis［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2014，42（7）：11-15，23.
2	肖迪，刘轶，李开隆，等.小黑杨PsnHB13基因在烟草中的遗传转化与功能分析［J］.植物研究，2020，40（4）：593-601.
	Xiao D，Liu Y，Li K L，et al.Genetic transformation and function analysis of PsnHB13 gene isolated from Populu ssimonii × P.nigra in Nicotiana tabacum［J］.Bulletin of Botanical Research，2020，40（4）：593-601.
3	金胶胶，宋子文，马晓雨，等.大青杨对不同干旱胁迫强度的形态和生理响应［J］.植物研究，2019，39（4）：490-496.
	Jin J J，Song Z W，Ma X Y，et al.Morphological and physiological responses of Populus ussuriensis Kom.to drought stress［J］.Bulletin of Botanical Research，2019，39（4）：490-496.
4	袁显磊.黑龙江不同地区杨树扦插苗生长特性的比较［J］.防护林科技，2014（5）：13-16.
	Yuan X L.Comparison of growth features of cutting seedlings for poplar in different regions of Heilongjiang province［J］.Protection Forest Science and Technology，2014（5）：13-16.
5	宋子文，刘焕臻，马晓雨，等.镉胁迫对大青杨不同倍体的生长及生理生化的影响［J］.植物研究，2020，40（5）：728-734.
	Song Z W，Liu H Z，Ma X Y，et al.Effects of cadmium stress on growth，physiology and biochemistry of different ploidy of Populus ussuriensis［J］.Bulletin of Botanical Research，2020，40（5）：728-734.
6	付晓凤，朱原，黄杰，等.氮、磷、钾配比施肥对扁桃幼苗生长及叶片养分含量的影响［J］.四川农业大学学报，2019，37（5）：629-635.
	Fu X F，Zhu Y，Huang J，et al.Effects of N，P and K fertilization treatments on the growth and nutrient contents in Leaves of Mangifera persiciformis C.Seedlings［J］.Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University，2019，37（5）：629-635.
7	常冀原，张斌，许琪，等.氮、磷、钾对江南油杉形态及生理变化的影响［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2015，35（5）：46-50.
	Chang J Y，Zhang B，Xu Q，et al.Effects of N，P and K fertilizer ratio on morphological and physiological changes of Keteleeria cyclolepis seedlings［J］.Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology，2015，35（5）：46-50.
8	兰忠明，张辉，周仕全，等.氮、磷、钾配施对紫云英鲜草产量、养分含量的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2012（1）：48-52.
	Lan Z M，Zhang H，Zhou S Q，et al.Effect of different fertilization on the yield of fresh grass and nutrient content by Chinese milk vetch［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2012（1）：48-52.
9	魏国余，亢亚超，廖曦，等.配方施肥对红锥幼林生理及叶片养分含量的影响［J］.西北林学院学报，2020，35（4）：32-36，83.
	Wei G Y，Kang Y C，Liao X，et al.Effects of formula fertilization on the physiology characteristics and leaf nutrition contents of young Castanopsis hystrix stands［J］.Journal of Northwest Forestry University，2020，35（4）：32-36，83.
10	苏兰茜，白亭玉，鱼欢，等.有机肥与化肥配施对菠萝蜜幼苗光合及养分吸收的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2020（5）：117-123.
	Su L X，Bai T Y，Yu H，et al.Effects of combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on photosynthesis and nutrient uptake of jackfruit seedlings［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2020（5）：117-123.
11	李博，唐毓佐，任永胜，等.配方施肥对刺黑竹产量和品质的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料，2020（8）：1-11.
	Li B，Tang Y Z，Ren Y S，et al.Effects of formula fertilization on the yield and quality of Chimonobambusa neopurpurea［J］.Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2020（8）：1-11.
12	李雯，张程，王庆成，等.指数施肥对白桦裸根苗生长动态、生物量分配及光合作用的影响［J］.植物研究，2015，35（3）：391-396，405.
	Li W，Zhang C，Wang Q C，et al.Effect of exponential fertilization on growth dynamic，biomass allocation and photosynthesis of Betula platyphylla bare-rooted seedlings［J］.Bulletin of Botanical Research，2015，35（3）：391-396，405.
13	周樊，陈文静，曹凡，等.配比施肥对薄壳山核桃幼苗生长和生理特性的影响［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2020，40（9）：96-103.
	Zhou F，Chen W J，Cao F，et al.Effects of fertilization on growth and physiological characteristics of pecan seedlings［J］.Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology，2020，40（9）：96-103.
14	柳结苗，朱小楼，蔡广越，等.氮素指数施肥对池杉幼苗生长及养分积累的影响［J］.东北林业大学学报，2018，46（10）：1-4.
	Liu J M，Zhu X L，Cai G Y，et al.Effects of N exponential fertilization on growth and nutrient accumulation of Taxodium ascendens seedlings［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2018，46（10）：1-4.
15	胡厚臻，侯文娟，潘启龙，等.配方施肥对刨花润楠幼苗生长和光合生理的影响［J］.西北林学院学报，2015，30（6）：39-45.
	Hu H Z，Hou W J，Pan Q L，et al.Effects of formulated fertilization on the growth and photosynthetic physiological properties of Machilus pauhoi seedlings［J］.Journal of Northwest Forestry University，2015，30（6）：39-45.
16	李国雷，祝燕，蒋乐，等.指数施肥对栓皮栎容器苗生长和氮积累的影响［J］.东北林业大学学报，2012，40（11）：6-9.
	Li G L，Zhu Y，Jiang L，et al.Effect of exponential fertilization on growth and nitrogen storage of containerized Quercus variabilis seedlings［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2012，40（11）：6-9.
17	杨阳，施皓然，及利，等.指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响［J］.南京林业大学学报：自然科学版，2020，44（2）：91-97.
	Yang Y，Shi H R，Ji L，et al.Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and root morphology of Tilia amurensis seedlings［J］.Journal of Nanjing Forestry University：Natural Sciences Edition，2020，44（2）：91-97.
18	苏利荣，秦芳，曾成城，等.不同施肥水平对核桃产量品质及叶片养分的影响［J］.中国南方果树，2020，49（6）：111-115，120.
	Su L R，Qing F，Zeng C C，et al.Effects of different fertilization levels on yield，quality and leaf nutrients of walnut［J］.Fruit Tree of South China，2020，49（6）：111-115，120.
19	郑小琴，陈文静，曹凡，等.配方施肥对薄壳山核桃苗期养分含量及光合作用的影响［J］.南京林业大学学报：自然科学版，2019，43（5）：169-174.
	Zheng X Q，Chen W J，Cao F，et al.Effects of the proportional fertilization on the nutrient content and photosynthesis of young grafted pecan seedlings［J］.Journal of Nanjing Forestry University：Natural Sciences Edition，2019，43（5）：169-174.

编号 No.	N （g·株^-1）	P （g·株^-1）	K （g·株^-1）	尿素（g·株^-1） Urea	磷酸二铵（g·株^-1） Diammonium phosphate	硫酸钾（g·株^-1） Potassium Sulfate
1	1.5	0.75	0. 5	2.63	1.63	1.00
2	1.5	1.50	1.0	1.98	3.26	2.00
3	1.5	3.00	2.0	0.72	6.52	4.00
4	3.0	0.75	1.0	5.89	1.63	2.00
5	3.0	1.50	2.0	5.24	3.26	4.00
6	3.0	3.00	0.5	3.98	6.52	1.00
7	6.0	0.75	2.0	12.41	1.63	4.00
8	6.0	1.50	0.5	11.76	3.26	1.00
9	6.0	3.00	1.0	10.50	6.52	2.00
10（CK）	0	0	0	0	0	0

[1]	Hua YANG, Qihang LU, Yanjun DU, Wenna WANG. Whole-plant Carbon and Nitrogen Allocation and Trade-off Strategies of Invasive Laguncularia racemosa and Native Avicennia marina across Dry and Wet Seasons [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2026, 46(2): 336-347.
[2]	Wenhao BO, Qianqian WU, Mengzhen LÜ, Haizhen WANG. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Progress on Sesbania [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2026, 46(1): 38-50.
[3]	Lei GAO, Ruitong YANG, Baodong LIU, Shuxia JIA, Yafen GUO, Xiaoyang CUI. Diversification of Plant Soil Nitrogen Uptake Strategies and Its Ecological Implications [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(5): 662-674.
[4]	Qize ZHAO, Xiaofei CHA, Shaojie ZHENG, Yuanyou WANG, Xinglan WEI, Qiong DONG. Response of Stoichiometric Characteristics of C, N and P and Biomass of Fraxinus malacophylla Seedlings to Rainfall Changes [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(5): 695-706.
[5]	Xi ZHANG, Haifu FANG, Hong ZHAO, Jiacheng SHEN, Liangying LIU, Xintong XU, Ling ZHANG. The Effects of Soil Nitrogen and Microbial Community on Growth of Moso Bamboo and Japanese Cedar Seedlings: Potential Mechanisms of Bamboo Expansion [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(5): 755-768.
[6]	Tianyou JIANG, Shuoshuo LIANG, Chengqing LI, Liushen HU, Shuai XIONG, Xiyan JI, Meifang HOU, Linkui CAO, Zhimin SHA. Effect of Grass Cultivation on Ammonia Volatility in Peach Orchard Soil [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(5): 783-794.
[7]	Zheng ZHANG, Peng ZHANG. Comparative Research on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Three Poplar Varieties Grown in Western Heilongjiang [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(5): 807-815.
[8]	Wenhui YAN, Shilong DUAN, Lin ZHANG. Mechanisms and Regulation of Interactions between AM Fungi and Hyphosphere Bacteria in Organic Phosphorus Mineralization [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(3): 345-351.
[9]	Xi LIU, Hongyuan HUANG, Shengchang YI, Yadi YU, Hao WANG, Xiaokang NI, Yuli HU, Ling ZHANG. Progress on Interaction of Invasive Plants and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Its Effect on Soil Nitrogen Cycling [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(3): 371-385.
[10]	Yuwei GUO, Jing LIANG, Haibing WU, Chuanjie ZHOU, Linlin SUN, Zhibao WANG, Xiaoru LI, Xiangfeng CHEN, Mulan LI. Ecosystem Carbon Storage Distribution and Influencing Factors in Different-aged Poplar Plantations in the Yellow River Floodplain in Western Shandong, China [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(2): 241-253.
[11]	Zhaoxin HE, Lianfeng WU, Yongzhe WANG, Yunjie GU, Fengwei ZHAO, Xingchang WANG, Xiaochun WANG. Spatio-temporal Pattern of Aboveground Biomass in Daqing Grassland and Its Relationship with Climatic Factors [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(1): 34-44.
[12]	Xiongzhong MA, Weihong XIONG, Zhe SUN. Analysis of Biomass Allocation and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Bidens alba in the Nanliu River Basin [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(6): 852-862.
[13]	Yixue LI, Dongmei YE, Longfei HAO, Tingyan LIU, Jiajing DUAN, Zhengying NIE. The Responses of Rhizosphere Soil of Caragana korshinskii under Soil Sterilization, AM Fungi Inoculation and N Addition [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(4): 590-601.
[14]	Yanru GAO, Junhui WANG, Wenjun MA, Fude WANG, Sanping AN, Jiacun GU. Characteristics of Fine Root Morphology and Biomass Vertical Distribution from Different Provenances and Families of Picea koraiensis [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(3): 380-388.
[15]	Juan XIA, Xudong SUN, Na WANG, Rui LI, Juan CHEN, Guoqiang GAO. Fine Root Biomass and Root Length Density of Pinus tabulaeformis and Cupressus chengiana Plantations in the Arid Valleys of the Upper Minjiang River [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(2): 259-266.