Difference of Tolerance to Heavy Metal Zinc Stress of Five Sedum Plants

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.06.017

Abstract

Abstract:

For the pollution of farmland around zinc mines was seriours in China， so an ideal method to screen plant materials with strong resistance to zinc was needed. 5 Sedum plants including Sedum spectabile， S. aizoon， S. hybridum， S. lydium and S. spurium ‘Coccineum were used as materials and potted planting， the different concentrations of exogenous zinc（0，80，160，320，800，1600，2 000 mg·kg^-1） added on the plants growth（biomass and plants height ） and the tolerance of to heavy metal zinc stress of plants was compared and analyzed respectively. The results showed that：The biomass and height of 5 Sedum plants increased first and then decreased with the concentration of heavy metal zinc increased and the growth of plants was inhibited， of which Sedum aizoon and Sedum lydium suffered more severe from zinc toxicity； The maximum growth of 5 Sedum plants appeared in different zinc concentrations， and the increase rate becoming negative appeared in different zinc concentrations either； The R² values in linear analysis of growth and zinc stress of 5 Sedum plants were better， coefficient of regression equation could explain the promotion and inhibition rate of biomass and plant height of 5 Sedum plants， in terms of biomass， the growth promotion rate of S. spurium ‘Coccineum’ was largest， inhibition rate of S. hybridum was largest， and in terms of plant height， the growth promotion and inhibition rate of S. spectabile was largest.

Key words: zinc stress, Sedum, biomass, height of plant, differences

CLC Number:

Q945.79

Ying WANG, Hong-Bo XU, Yang WANG, Meng-Qian WANG, Cheng-Zhong WANG, Yuan-Sen YIN, Xue SUN, Hui ZHOU, Li-Huan ZHUO. Difference of Tolerance to Heavy Metal Zinc Stress of Five Sedum Plants[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(6): 982-992.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 4

References 29

1	简敏菲，汪斯琛，余厚平，等.Cd²⁺、Cu²⁺胁迫对黑藻（Hydrilla verticillata）的生长及光合荧光特性的影响［J］.生态学报，2016，36（6）：1719-1727.
	Jian M F，Wang S C，Yu H P，et al.Influence of Cd²⁺or Cu²⁺stress on the growth and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics of Hydrilla verticillata［J］.Acta Ecologica Sinica，2016，36（6）：1719-1727.
2	王旭旭，黄鑫浩，胡丰姣，等.4种木本植物对重金属铅、锌的积累及叶片养分含量特征研究［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2018，38（6）：115-122.
	Wang X X，Huang X H，Hu F J，et al.Characteristics of Pb，Zn accumulation and foliar nutrient in four kinds of woody species［J］.Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology，2018，38（6）：115-122.
3	杨肖娥，龙新宪，倪吾钟，等.东南景天（Sedum alfredii H）——一种新的锌超积累植物［J］.科学通报，2002，47（13）：1003-1006.
	Yang X E，Long X X，Ni W Z，et al.Sedum alfredii H：A new Zn hyperaccumulating plant first found in China［J］.Chinese Science Bulletin，2002，47（19）：1634-1637.
4	朱凰榕，周良华，阳峰，等.两种景天修复Cd/Zn污染土壤效果的比较［J］.生态环境学报，2019，28（2）：403-410.
	Zhu H R，Zhou L H，Yang F，et al.Phytoremediation effects and contrast of Sedum alfredii and Sedum plumbizincicola on Cd/Zn contaminated soil［J］.Ecology and Environment Science，2019，28（2）：403-410.
5	杨文浩.镉污染/镉—锌—铅复合污染土壤植物提取修复的根际微生态效应研究［D］.杭州：浙江大学，2014.
	Yang W H.Micro-ecological effects in the rhizosphere of Sedum alfredii Hance during phytoextraction of Cd or Cd-Zn-Pb contaminated soils［D］.Hangzhou：Zhejiang University，2014
6	王莹.长药景天（Hylotelephium spectabile）响应锌胁迫的根际生理生态学研究［D］.哈尔滨：东北林业大学，2017.
	Wang Y.Research on ecophysiology of rhizosphere of Hylotelephium spectabile under Zn stress［D］.Haerbin：Northeast Forestry University，2017.
7	陈伟.重金属胁迫对草坪草生长发育及生理特性的影响［D］.兰州：甘肃农业大学，2014.
	Chen W.Effects of heavy metal stress on growth and physiological characteristics of turf plants［D］.Lanzhou：Gansu Agricultural University，2014.
8	丁继军，潘远智，刘柿良，等.土壤重金属镉胁迫对石竹幼苗生长的影响及其机理［J］.草业学报，2013，22（6）：77-85.
	Ding J J，Pan Y Z，Liu S L，et al.Effect and mechanisms of soil cadmium stress on Dianthus chinensis seedling growth［J］.Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2013，22（6）：77-85.
9	孙博文，王乾鑫，杨远祥，等.Cd、Pb单一及复合胁迫对白花蛇舌草幼苗生长状况的影响［J］.四川农业大学学报，2019，37（6）：792-798，884.
	Sun B W，Wang Q X，Yang Y Y，et al.Cd，Pb single and combined stress on the growth effects of Hedyotis diffusa seedling［J］.Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University，2019，37（6）：792-798，884.
10	王爱云，黄姗姗，钟国锋，等.铬胁迫对3种草本植物生长及铬积累的影响［J］.环境科学，2012，33（6）：2028-2037.
	Wang A Y，Huang S S，Zhong G F，et al.Effect of Cr（Ⅵ） stress on growth of three Herbaceous Plants and Their Cr Uptake［J］.Environmental Science，2012，33（6）：2028-2037.
11	张明超，李景朝，李鹏远，等.国内外铅锌矿资源及分布概述［J］.中国矿业，2016，25（S1）：41-45，103.
	ZHANG M C，LI J C，LI P Y，et al.Summarize on the lead and zinc ore resources of the world and China［J］.China Mining Magazine，2016，25（S1）：41-45，103.
12	刘铮.我国土壤中锌含量的分布规律［J］.中国农业科学，1994，27（1）：30-37.
	Liu Z.Regularities of Content and Distribution of Zinc in Soils of China［J］.Scientia Agricultura Sinica，1994，27（1）：30-37.
13	陆泗进，何立环，王业耀.湖南省桂阳县某铅锌矿周边农田土壤重金属污染及生态风险评价［J］.环境化学，2015，34（3）：591-592.
	Lu S J，He L H，Wang Y Y.Heavy metal pollution and ecological risk assessment of the paddy soils near a zinc-lead mining area in Guiyang County，Hunan Province［J］Environmental Chemistry，2015，34（3）：591-592.
14	田莉，李国琛，王颜红，等.葫芦岛锌厂周边农田土壤重金属浓度的空间变异及污染评价［J］.生态学杂志，2016，35（11）：3086-3092.
	Tian L，Li G C，Wang Y H，et al.Spatial distribution of heavy metals and pollution evaluation in farmland soil surrounding Huludao Zinc Plant［J］.Chinese Journal of Ecology，2016，35（11）：3086-3092.
15	张云霞，宋波，杨子杰，等.广西某铅锌矿影响区农田土壤重金属污染特征及修复策略［J］.农业环境科学学报，2018，37（2）：239-249.
	Zhang Y X，Song B，Yang Z J，et al.Characteristics and remediation strategy of heavy-metal polluted agricultural soil near a lead and zinc mine in Guangxi［J］.Journal of Agro-Environment Science，2018，37（2）：239-249.
16	徐芹磊，陈炎辉，谢团辉，等.铅锌矿区农田土壤重金属污染现状与评价［J］.环境科学与技术，2018，41（2）：176-182.
	Xu Q L，Chen Y H，Xie T H，et al.Current situation and assessment of heavy metals pollution in farmland soils around a Pb-Zn mine［J］.Environmental Science & Technology，2018，41（2）：176-182.
17	邢宏霖，龙睿，伍钢.南方铅锌冶炼企业周边土壤重金属污染研究［J］.湖南农业科学，2018（8）：51-55.
	Xing H L，Long R，Wu G.Heavy metal pollution of farmland soils around lead and zinc smelting enterprises in Southern China［J］.Hunan Agricultural Sciences，2018（8）：51-55.
18	周艳，陈樯，邓绍坡，等.西南某铅锌矿区农田土壤重金属空间主成分分析及生态风险评价［J］.环境科学，2018，39（6）：2884-2892.
	Zhou Y，Chen Q，Deng S P，et al.Principal component analysis and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in farmland soils around a Pb-Zn mine in Southwestern China［J］.Environmental Science，2018，39（6）：2884-2892.
19	吴劲楠，龙健，刘灵飞，等.某铅锌矿区农田重金属分布特征及其风险评价［J］.中国环境科学，2018，38（3）：1054-1063.
	Wu J N，Long J，Liu L F，et al.Spatial distribution and risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil of a lead-zinc mining area［J］.China Environmental Science，2018，38（3）：1054-1063.
20	梁雅雅，易筱筠，党志，等.某铅锌尾矿库周边农田土壤重金属污染状况及风险评价［J］.农业环境科学学报，2019，38（1）：103-110.
	Liang Y Y，Yi X Y，Dang Z，et al.Pollution and risk assessment of heavy metals in agricultural soils around a Pb-Zn tailing pond［J］.Journal of Agro-Environment Science，2019，38（1）：103-110.
21	张浩，王辉，汤红妍，等.铅锌尾矿库土壤和蔬菜重金属污染特征及健康风险评价［J］.环境科学学报，2020，40（3）：1085-1094.
	Zhang H，Wang H，Tang H Y，et al.Heavy metal pollution characteristics and health risk evaluation of soil and vegetables in various functional areas of lead-zinc tailings pond［J］.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae，2020，40（3）：1085-1094.
22	陆泗进，王业耀，何立环.会泽某铅锌矿周边农田土壤重金属风险评价研究［J］.中国环境监测，2015，31（6）：77-82.
	Lu S J，Wang Y Y，He L H.Ecological and healty risk of heavy metals in soils near a Pb-Zn Mine in Huize Country［J］.Environmental Monitoring in China，2015，31（6）：77-82.
23	朱娜，李富荣，李敏，等.铅镉复合污染对不同品种蕹菜生长和重金属累积特性的影响［J］.热带农业科学，2016，36（6）：66-70.
	Zhu N，Li F R，Li M，et al.Effects of combined Pb and Cd pollution on growth and heavy metal accumulation characteristics of different Ipanoea aquatica cultivars［J］.Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture，2016，36（6）：66-70.
24	Hall J L.Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance［J］.Journal of Experimental Botany，2002，53（366）：1-11.
25	Zhang J，Yang S Y，Huang Y J，et al.The tolerance and accumulation of Miscanthus sacchariflorus（Maxim.）Benth．，an Energy Plant Species，to Cadmium［J］．International Journal of Phytoremediation，2015，17（6）：538-545.
26	毛石花.五节芒对污染土壤中重金属铅锌的耐受性及富集特征研究［D］.长沙：湖南农业大学，2013.
	Mao S H.Investigation on Tolerance and enrichment characteristics of Miscanthus to Pb and Zn in polluted soil［D］.Changsha：Hunan Agricultural University，2013.
27	高艳.重金属Pb²⁺胁迫对轮叶黑藻毒性效应研究［D］.重庆：西南大学，2017.
	Gao Y.The toxic effects of heavy metal Pb²⁺stress on Hydrilla verticillata［D］.Chongqing：Southwest University，2017.
28	段德超，于明革，施积炎.植物对铅的吸收、转运、累积和解毒机制研究进展［J］.应用生态学报，2014，25（1）：287-296.
	Duan D C，Yu M G，Shi J Y.Research advances in uptake，translocation，accumulation and detoxification of Pb in plants［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2014，25（1）：287-296.
29	吴道铭，陈晓阳，曾曙才.芒属植物重金属耐性及其在矿山废弃地植被恢复中的应用潜力［J］.应用生态学报，2017，28（4）：1397-1406.
	Wu D M，Chen X M，Zeng S C.Heavy metal tolerance of Miscanthus plants and their phytoremediation potential in abandoned mine land［J］.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2017，28（4）：1397-1406.

理化指标 physical and chemical index	数值 Value
pH	6.92±0.12
有机质Organic matter（mg·kg^-1）	45.4±1.25
速效氮Available nitrogen（mg·kg^-1）	149±13.43
有效磷Available phosphorus（mg·kg^-1）	30.6±3.67
速效钾Available potassium（mg·kg^-1）	156±12.31
Zn含量 Zn content（mg·kg^-1）	66±13.57
有效Zn含量 Available Zn content（mg·kg^-1）	10.8±1.23

种类 Species		浓度Content（mg·kg^-1）
种类 Species		0	80	160	320	800	1 600	2 000
长药景天 S. spectabile	实际值 Actual value	7.93±2.02a	9.75±1.55ab	11.32±0.24b	8.95±1.41ab	8.73±1.42ab	8.33±1.81a	7.29±0.40a
长药景天 S. spectabile	相对值 Relative value	0±0A	28.31%±0.37A	50.66%±0.47A	22.00%±0.54A	15.67%±0.38A	10.03%±0.35A	-3.70%±0.26A
三七景天 S. aizoon	实际值 Actual value	11.19±1.34ab	12.21±2.39a	12.95±2.08a	8.92±1.79b	5.66±0.25c	4.81±1.51c	4.76±1.35c
三七景天 S. aizoon	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	8.58%±0.10A	16.70%±0.23A	-18.45%±0.24B	-49.09%±0.04C	-57.27%±0.11C	-56.27%±0.16C
德国景天 S. hybridum	实际值 Actual value	0.84±0.11ab	1.05±0.10ab	1.16±0.34a	1.81±0.25c	1.60±0.33c	1.06±0.22ab	0.67±0.09b
德国景天 S. hybridum	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	25.54%±0.11AB	31.33%±0.44AB	88.72%±0.41CD	43.87%±0.24AC	14.79%±0.12AB	-14.76%±0.16B
松塔景天 S. lydium	实际值 Actual value	1.29±0.40a	1.42±0.36a	1.32±0.40a	1.07±0.19ab	0.75±0.10bc	0.62±0.13bc	0.53±0.06c
松塔景天 S. lydium	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	26.12%±0.81A	15.37%±0.67AB	-6.18%±0.53AB	-36.90%±0.24AB	-50.07%±0.11C	-56.39%±0.13C
胭脂红景天 S. spurium ‘Coccineum’	实际值 Actual value	0.37±0.05ab	0.50±0.16c	0.41±0.06ac	0.36±0.05ab	0.31±0.03ab	0.28±0.06ab	0.25±0.07b
胭脂红景天 S. spurium ‘Coccineum’	相对值 Relative value	0±0ABC	36.87%±0.39A	12.48%±0.25AB	-0.66%±0.27ABC	-14.12%±0.07BC	-23.38%±0.15BC	-30.99%±0.17C

种类 Species		浓度Content（mg·kg^-1）
种类 Species		0	80	160	320	800	1 600	2 000
长药景天 S. spectabile	实际值 Actual value	41.73±5.97ab	50.8±3.54ac	56.50±6.10c	53.93±7.31c	42.57±4.46ab	41.30±3.01a	38.03±5.28a
长药景天 S. spectabile	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	23.44%±0.19AC	36.19%±0.12C	29.35%±0.03C	4.48%±0.27AB	-0.25%±0.09AB	-7.14%±0.21B
三七景天 S. aizoon	实际值 Actual value	53.97±4.11a	54.20±10.37a	54.80±1.77a	52.87±3.95a	41.83±0.21b	37.23±1.67b	32.60±0.82c
三七景天 S. aizoon	相对值 Relative value	0±0A	1.57%±0.25A	2.08%±0.11A	-1.93%±0.06A	-22.18%±0.06B	-30.89%±0.02B	-39.42%±0.04B
德国景天 S. hybridum	实际值 Actual value	32.20±3.74a	33.43±4.29a	33.80±0.61a	35.70±2.44a	34.37±0.31a	27.73±1.76b	25.47±0.47b
德国景天 S. hybridum	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	4.41%±0.16AB	5.79%±0.11A	11.43%±0.09A	7.57%±0.11A	-13.04%±0.12B	-20.34%±0.07C
松塔景天 S. lydium	实际值 Actual value	32.97±0.38ab	35.57±0.98a	34.33±4.08ab	31.37±3.84b	28.40±1.97b	26.47±1.30c	25.07±0.71c
松塔景天 S. lydium	相对值 Relative value	0±0AB	7.87%±0.02A	4.08%±0.12AB	4.81%±0.12BC	13.89%±0.05CD	-19.74%±0.03D	-23.97%±0.02D
胭脂红景天 S. spurium ‘Coccineum’	实际值 Actual value	28.83±5.05ab	32.17±1.82a	29.80±1.30ab	27.70±2.08ab	27.23±1.22b	27.60±2.12ab	26.63±3.20b
胭脂红景天 S. spurium ‘Coccineum’	相对值 Relative value	0±0A	13.66%±0.20A	6.05%±0.23A	-2.72%±0.11A	-3.71%±0.17A	-3.10%±0.11A	-4.38%±0.28A

	范围 Range（mg·kg^-1）	pH值 pH value	均值 Mean value （mg·kg^-1）	参考文献 Reference
标准（背景值） Standars（Background value）	3~709		100	［12］
国家标准National standard		pH≤6.5	200.0
		7.5<pH<6.5	250.0
		pH＜7.5	300.0
湖南省桂阳县市黄沙坪某铅锌矿周边的农田土壤 Paddy soils near a zinc-lead mining area in Guiyang County，Hunan Province	1 322~3 786		1908.0	［13］
葫芦岛锌厂Huludao Zinc factory	83~1 670		367.0	［14］
广西壮族自治区东北部铅锌矿Lead and zinc mine in Guangx	79.9~11 500		541.4	［15］
福建省西部山区某铅锌矿区下游农田土壤 Paddy soils in the lower reaches of a lead-zinc mining area in the western mountainous area of Fujian Province	146.8~1 580		736.3	［16］
湘、渝、黔边陲县 Paddy soils located in Hunan，Chongqing，Guangxi border counties	148~3 267		612.3	［17］
沘江两岸农田土壤 Paddy soils on both sides of Bi River	59.7~6 910		933.4	［18］
会泽县者海镇铅锌矿区周边农田土壤 Paddy soils surrounding a Pb-Zn mining in Huize County，Zhehai Town	135.5~22 676.32		1465.0	［19］
广东省梅州市梅县丙村镇铅锌尾矿库农田 Paddy soils surrounding a Pb-Zn tailing pond in Guangdong Province	45.89~2 847.48		321.8	［20］
洛阳西南部某铅锌尾矿库农田土壤 Paddy soils in a lead-zinc tailings area，southwest of Luoyang，Henan	376.67~1 084.99		628.3	［21］
云南省会泽县某铅锌矿周边农田土壤 Paddy soils Pb-Zn Mine near Huize Country，Yunnan Province	183~697		337.8	［22］

[1]	Jikang XU, Yanhong HE, Tingyan LIU, Longfei HAO, Shengxi ZHANG, Zhaoyi LI. Characteristics of Rhizosphere Soil Microecological Environment of Different Ecological Restoration Vegetation in Arsenic Sandstone Areas [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 531-539.
[2]	Yue REN, Cheng WEI, Tiantian XU, Hailong SHEN, Ling YANG. Effects of Cryopreservation on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Fraxinus mandshurica Embryos [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(3): 396-403.
[3]	Kenian LINGHU, Shu WANG. Responses of Biomass Allocation to Population Density and Soil Water in Abutilon theophrasti at Different Growth Stages [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 272-280.
[4]	Huixiao YANG, Fang XU, Xiaohui YANG, Huanqin LIAO, Weihua ZHANG, Wen PAN. Effects of Different Water and Nutrient Treatments on Growth and Biomass Distribution of Eucalyptus urophylla Clones [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 667-676.
[5]	Shubing BAI, Xiaoyi XING, Wenyu GUAN, Li DONG. Effects of Shouyun Iron Mine Abandoned Soil on the Growth of Two Sedum Species [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 677-687.
[6]	Guo-Yu SUN, Xiao-Yu MA, Jia-Xin YI, Fang-Ping ZHANG, Chun-Hua ZHANG, Kai-Long LI. Effects of Nutrient Supply on Growth Dynamics and Nutrient Allocation of Poplars [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(5): 690-699.
[7]	Min WANG, Run-Hui ZHOU, Fei-Yan YU, Hong-Jun DONG, Cong-Lin CHEN, Jing YU, Jian-Feng HAO. Dynamic Changes of Undergrowth Species Diversity and Biomass of Eucalyptus robusta Plantations at Different Ages [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(4): 496-505.
[8]	SHANG Kan-Kan, ZHANG Xi-Jin, SONG Kun. Variation of Stem-leaf Size Relationship of Woody Plants among Different LifeForms in Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(5): 641-647.
[9]	HOU Xue-Yue, DENG Jun-Jie, YAO Zhi-Hong, HUANG Shou-Chen, LI Jia-Zhe, CHA Xin-You, MA De-Zhi, ZHANG Rong-Shu. Effects of Trichoderma on the Growth-related Physiological Indexes of Rocketsalad(Eruca sativa) [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(3): 347-352.
[10]	ZHAO Zhe, JIN Ze-Xin. Effects of Simulated Nitrogen Deposition on the Growth and the Content of Non-structure Carbohydrate of Sinocalycanthus chinensis Seedlings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(1): 41-49.
[11]	QIU Dong, ZHANG Jing, WU Nan, TAO Ye. Individual Traits and Their Interrelationships of Gametophyte and Sporophyte of a Moss Pogonatum inflexum in the Dalongshan National Forest Park in Anhui Province [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 835-845.
[12]	CAI Nian-Hui, WANG Da-Wei, HUANG Wen-Xue, WU Jun-Wen, WANG Jun-Min, CHEN Shi, XU Yu-Lan, DUAN An-An. Correlation and Path Analysis on Growth Traits and Biomass of Pinus yunnanensis Seedlings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 853-862.
[13]	LIU Ting-Yan, HAO Long-Fei, WANG Qing-Cheng, BAI Shu-Lan. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Cultivating Quality of Padus maackii Seedlings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 863-868.
[14]	ZHANG Ling, ZHANG Dong-Lai. Difference in Morphology and Physiology from Male and Female Plant of Phellodendron amurense Rupr. [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 876-882.
[15]	XIE Zhi-Yu, ZHANG Wen-Hui, WEI Yong-Tao. Morphological Variations and Physiological Characteristics of Phragmites australis in Three Habitats in Yellow River Delta [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(3): 372-379.