Detailed Phenotypical Analysis on the Mutant ssr1-2 Encoding a Mitochondrial Protein of Arabidopsis thaliana

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2023.03.012

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the role of SSR1 gene encoding a functionally unknown mitochondrial protein of Arabidopsis thaliana in plant growth and stress response， ssr1-2 and its suppressor mutants EMS143 and EMS145 were used to track the growth of their roots and aboveground parts， as well as their proline sensitivity and iron homeostasis， and the effects of ssr1-2 short root phenotype on aboveground growth of seedlings were analyzed by micrografting. The results showed that the primary root length of ssr1-2 was shorter and the root architecture was similar to the fibrous root system. The growth of their shoots was also retarded， but appeared considerably later than the short-root phenotype. The results of micrografting revealed that the roots of ssr1-2 could restrict the growth of the wild-type shoots and， and conversely， the shoot of ssr1-2 could also affect the growth of the wild-type roots， but the former had a bigger effect. ssr1-2 showed a hypersensitive phenotype to proline in seed germination， root length and leaf chlorophyll content. In addition， ssr1-2 appeared insensitive to Fe nutrition， that was， the stimulating effect of Fe salt on seedling growth was significantly less than that of wild-type WS， indicating a significant decrease in its ability to utilize Fe. The results suggested that SSR1 might be involved in the regulation of A. thaliana root growth by affecting the utilization of iron nutrient， implying that the impairment of the mitochondrial iron utilization machinery might contribute significantly to the enhanced inhibitory effect of proline on plant growth and development.

Key words: SSR1, proline treatment, iron-sulfur cluster assembly, micrografting, Arabidopsis thaliana

CLC Number:

S335

Yuanyuan CAI, Jibenben XIA, Wenhan YING, Jieyao WANG, Tao XIE, Kongya XING, Xuanjun FENG, Xuejun HUA. Detailed Phenotypical Analysis on the Mutant ssr1-2 Encoding a Mitochondrial Protein of Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(3): 421-431.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.5

References 20

1	SZABADOS L， SAVOURÉ A.Proline：a multifunctional amino acid［J］.Trends in Plant Science，2010，15（2）：89-97.
2	KAUR G， ASTHIR B.Proline：a key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance［J］.Biologia Plantarum，2015，59（4）：609-619.
3	MATTIOLI R， MARCHESE D， D’Angeli S，et al.Modulation of intracellular proline levels affects flowering time and inflorescence architecture in Arabidopsis ［J］.Plant Molecular Biology，2008，66（3）：277-288.
4	MANI S， VAN DE COTTE B， VAN MONTAGU M，et al.Altered levels of proline dehydrogenase cause hypersensitivity to proline and its analogs in Arabidopsis ［J］.Plant Physiology，2002，128（1）：73-83.
5	NANJO T， FUJITA M， SEKI M，et al.Toxicity of free proline revealed in an Arabidopsis T-DNA-tagged mutant deficient in proline dehydrogenase［J］.Plant and Cell Physiology，2003，44（5）：541-548.
6	DEUSCHLE K， FUNCK D， FORLANI G，et al.The role of Delta（1）-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase in proline degradation［J］.The Plant Cell，2004，16（12）：3413-3425.
7	LEE Y H， FOSTER J， CHEN J，et al.AAP1 transports uncharged amino acids into roots of Arabidopsis ［J］.The Plant Journal，2007，50（2）：305-319.
8	WANG T， CHEN Y， ZHANG M，et al. Arabidopsis AMINO ACID PERMEASE1 contributes to salt stress-induced proline uptake from exogenous sources［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science，2017，8：2182.
9	HELLMANN H， FUNCK D， RENTSCH D，et al.Hypersensitivity of an Arabidopsis sugar signaling mutant toward exogenous proline application［J］.Plant Physiology，2000，123（2）：779-789.
10	FENG X J， HU Y， ZHANG W X，et al.Revisiting the role of delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase in drought-tolerant crop breeding［J］.The Crop Journal，2022，10（4）：1213-1218.
11	HILDEBRANDT T M， NESI A N， ARAÚJO W L，et al.Amino acid catabolism in plants［J］.Molecular Plant，2015，8（11），1563-1579.
12	BONNER C A， WILLIAMS D S， ALDRICH H C，et al.Antagonism by L-glutamine of toxicity and growth inhibition caused by other amino acids in suspension cultures of Nicotiana silvestris ［J］.Plant Science，1996，113（1）：43-58.
13	ZHANG M， WANG C P， LIN Q F，et al.A tetratricopeptide repeat domain-containing protein SSR1 located in mitochondria is involved in root development and auxin polar transport in Arabidopsis ［J］.The Plant Journal，2015，83（4）：582-599.
14	HAN H L， LIU J， FENG X J，et al.SSR1 is involved in maintaining the function of mitochondria electron transport chain and iron homeostasis upon proline treatment in Arabidopsis ［J］.Journal of Plant Physiology，2021，256，153325.
15	TSUTSUI H， YANAGISAWA N， KAWAKATSU Y，et al.Micrografting device for testing systemic signaling in Arabidopsis ［J］.The Plant Journal，2020，103（2）：918-929.
16	GIEHL R F H， LIMA J E， VON WIRÉN N.Localized iron supply triggers lateral root elongation in Arabidopsis by altering the AUX1-mediated auxin distribution［J］.The Plant Cell，2012，24（1）：33-49.
17	CABASSA-HOURTON C， SCHERTL P， BORDENAVE-JACQUEMIN M，et al.Proteomic and functional analysis of proline dehydrogenase 1 link proline catabolism to mitochondrial electron transport in Arabidopsis thaliana ［J］.Biochemical Journal，2016，473（17），2623-2634.
18	TRAN D H， KESAVAN R， RION H，et al.Mitochondrial NADP+ is essential for proline biosynthesis during cell growth［J］.Nature Metabolism，2021，3（4）：571-585.
19	ZHU J J， SCHWÖRER S， BERISA M，et al.Mitochondrial NADP（H） generation is essential for proline biosynthesis［J］.Science，2021，372（6545）：968-972.
20	MILLER G， HONIG A， STEIN H，et al.Unraveling delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate-proline cycle in plants by uncoupled expression of proline oxidation enzymes［J］.Journal of Biological Chemistry，2009，284（39）：26482-26492.

时间 Time /d	相对萌发率 Relative germination rate /%
时间 Time /d	WS	ssr1-2	ssr1-2C	EMS143	EMS145
1	74.80	31.06	79.08	63.11	108.50
2	98.95	96.21	98.91	121.44	100.50
3	99.42	100.52	94.07	99.50	98.89
4	99.22	98.11	89.17	105.07	95.98
5	101.05	98.13	93.24	106.63	98.50
6	101.95	101.01	95.65	111.17	96.48
7	101.23	100.29	95.65	111.17	95.50

生长条件 Growth condition	株系 Line	指标Index
生长条件 Growth condition	株系 Line	主根长 Primary foot length /cm	叶片面积 Leaf area /cm²	叶绿素质量分数 Chlorophyll content /mg·g^-1
MS培养基 MS medium	WS	2.13	0.61	0.72
	ssr1-2	0.37	0.61	0.65
	ssr1-2C	2.16	0.63	0.73
	EMS143	2.01	0.70	0.57
	EMS145	1.98	0.66	0.67
20 mmol·L^-1 Pro的MS培养基 MS medium containg 20 mmol·L^-1 Pro	WS	1.00	0.43	0.27
	ssr1-2	0.16	0.37	0.17
	ssr1-2C	1.04	0.43	0.27
	EMS143	0.44	0.44	0.27
	EMS145	0.42	0.53	0.40

指标 Index	株系 Line	处理条件 Treat condition
指标 Index	株系 Line	处理1 Treat 1	处理2 Treat 2	处理3 Treat 3	处理4 Treat 4	处理5 Treat 5
主根长 Primary foot length /cm	WS	0.61	2.49	2.09	1.90	1.41
	ssr1-2	0.47	0.46	0.46	0.49	0.46
	ssr1-2C	0.63	2.44	1.99	1.95	1.46
	EMS143	0.60	1.90	1.82	1.98	1.68
	EMS145	0.45	1.18	1.25	0.88	0.65
净生长量 Net growth of primary root /cm	WS	0.04	0.03	0.39	0.22	0.35
	ssr1-2	0.06	0.02	0.03	0.01	0.01
	ssr1-2C	0.05	0.03	0.31	0.25	0.29
	EMS143	0.04	0.03	0.26	0.34	0.31
	EMS145	0.03	0.01	0.12	0.16	0.13
侧根长 Lateral root length /cm	WS	0.23	0.45	0.69	0.60	0.41
	ssr1-2	0.29	0.19	0.22	0.25	0.20
	ssr1-2C	0.23	0.45	0.68	0.64	0.42
	EMS143	0.21	0.81	0.80	1.03	0.75
	EMS145	0.20	0.44	0.78	0.81	0.68
侧根密度 Lateral root density/（number·cm^-1）	WS	3.22	1.72	1.91	1.89	2.09
	ssr1-2	4.44	4.67	4.83	4.67	4.10
	ssr1-2C	3.47	1.74	1.89	1.84	2.00
	EMS143	1.71	2.03	3.37	1.64	1.95
	EMS145	2.82	2.19	2.93	3.94	3.23
叶片面积 Leaf area /cm²	WS	0.72	0.73	0.73	0.75	0.75
	ssr1-2	0.67	0.72	0.66	0.63	0.62
	ssr1-2C	0.74	0.76	0.75	0.78	0.77
	EMS143	0.52	0.67	0.67	0.68	0.69
	EMS145	0.52	0.68	0.70	0.67	0.67
叶绿素质量分数 Chlorophyll content /（mg·g^-1）	WS	0.51	1.17	1.12	1.20	1.26
	ssr1-2	0.69	0.98	1.20	0.97	1.07
	ssr1-2C	0.53	1.22	1.11	1.16	1.19
	EMS143	0.41	0.97	0.99	0.94	0.94
	EMS145	0.34	1.13	1.11	0.91	0.94

[1]	Zhuanzhuan JIANG, Li GONG, Yaling SONG. The Chloroplast Division Protein PARC6 Affected the Growth of Cotyledon and Leaf in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(5): 700-710.
[2]	Sheng ZHENG, Haixia GAO, Min SU, Shanghuan LU, Tengguo ZHANG, Guofan WU. Exogenous Sucrose Affected AtKEA1 and AtKEA2 to Regulate Root Growth of Seedling in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(4): 562-571.
[3]	Yuping QIU, Yichuan WANG, Hongwei GUO. Research Progress on the Regulatory Mechanism of Plant Root Hair Development [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(3): 321-332.
[4]	Mengjiao Wang, Yuxue Cao, Yongsheng Xu, Fenge Ding, Qiao Su. Overexpression of Marine Microbial Metagenomic MbCSP Enhanced Drought and Cold Tolerance of Transgenic Arabidopsisthaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(2): 243-251.
[5]	ZHANG Yu-Qing, LIU Ye, QU Chun-Pu, LIU Guan-Jun, YANG Tian-Tian, YANG Cheng-Jun. Resistance Analysis of Transgenic PnDof30 Arabidopsis under Abiotic Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(3): 407-415.
[6]	LI Zi-Yi, HE Zi-Hang, LU Hui-Jun, WANG Yu-Cheng, JI Xiao-Yu. Study on Salt Tolerance of AtUNE12 Gene in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(2): 257-265.
[7]	HE Hao, ZHU Guo-Qing, CHEN Shi-Ya, XU Chang, JIN Shu-Mei. Cloning of LpPEX7 Gene from Lilium pumilum and Its Expression Characteristics under Salt Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(2): 274-283.
[8]	WANG Shuang, CHENG Yu-Xiang, XIA De-An. Identification of Key Amino Acid Sites in AtGDPD-Like3 with Role in Arabidopsis Root Hairs [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(1): 79-84.
[9]	LI Peng, HUAN Zhao-Wei, DING Lan. Rabdosinate Regulates Polar Auxin Carriers PIN1,PIN3 and PIN4 and Inhibits Root Growth of Arabidopsis thaliana Seedlings [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 908-916.
[10]	FAN Er-Qin, LIU Cai-Xia, FU Peng-Yue, YANG Chuan-Ping, QU Guan-Zheng. Expression Pattern of PagC3H3 Gene in Populus alba×P.glandulosa [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(4): 521-528.
[11]	ZHAO Min, WANG Yue-Xuan, XU Yun-Fei, ZHAO Qi-An, LIU Bo, YANG Ning. Relationship between H₂S and ABA Signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana under Drought Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(1): 104-112.