欢迎访问《植物研究》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

植物研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 323-329.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2018.03.002

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国6个植物原白中排印错误之更正

李超1, 林云2, 毕海燕3, 云映霞2   

  1. 1. 华北理工大学生命科学学院, 唐山 063210;
    2. 湖南省医药技工学校, 湖南食品药品职业学院, 长沙 410208;
    3. 北京自然博物馆, 北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-08 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 毕海燕,E-mail:rubybi@126.com E-mail:rubybi@126.com
  • 作者简介:李超(1977-),女,硕士,讲师,主要从事植物学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技基础条件平台——标本资源共享平台建设项目(2005DKA21401)

Correction of Typographical Errors in the Protologue of Six Taxa in China

LI Chao1, LIN Yun2, BI Hai-Yan3, YUN Ying-Xia2   

  1. 1. College of Biology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210;
    2. Hunan Medication Vestibule School, Hunan Food and Drug Vocational College, Changsha 410208;
    3. Beijing Museum of Natural History, Beijing 100050
  • Received:2017-12-08 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-17
  • Supported by:
    Plant Specimen Digitization and Chinese Virtual Herbarium Establishment(2005DKA21401)

摘要: 对我国紫草科(Boraginaceae)的密花齿缘草(Eritrichium confetiflorum W. T. Wang)、锚刺果(Glochisocaryum kansuense W. T. Wang)和大花长叶微孔草(Microula trichocarpa(Maxim.) Johnst. var. macrantha W. T. Wang),唇形科(Lamiaceae)的宽叶香茶菜(Rabdosia latifolia C. Y. Wu & H. W. Li),苦苣苔科(Gesneriaceae)的矮直瓣苣苔(Ancylostemon humilis W. T. Wang)以及葫芦科(Cucurbitaceae)的黑子赤瓟(Thladiantha villosula Cogn. var. nigrita A. M. Lu & Z. Y. Zhang)原白中主模式标本引证的排印错误做了更正。密花齿缘草原白中错误地将主模式标本引证为杨昌友700422,实际应为杨昌友700442。锚刺果原白中用中文错误地将主模式标本引证为傅坤俊1989,实际应为傅坤俊1489,前者属于百合科(Liliaceae)的Asparagus sichuanicus S. C. Chen & D. Q. Liu。大花长叶微孔草原白中主模式标本引证为李馨70287,实际应为李馨72087,前者属于杜鹃花科(Ericaceae)的Rhododendron edgarianum Rehder & Wilson。宽叶香茶菜原白中主模式标本引证为曲桂龄2049,实际应为曲桂龄2046,前者属于蔷薇科(Rosaceae)的Rosa caudata Baker。矮直瓣苣苔原白中主模式标本引证为杨光辉59063,实际应为杨光辉59043,前者属于桦木科(Betulaceae)的Betula fargesii Franch.。黑子赤瓟原白中主模式标本引证为冯国楣3439,实际应为冯国楣3429,前者属于伞形科(Apiaceae)的Bupleurum rockii H. Wolff。

关键词: 紫草科, 唇形科, 苦苣苔科, 葫芦科, 原白, 排印错误

Abstract: We corrected the typographical errors in the protologues of six taxa in China. The holotype of Eritrichium confetiflorum W. T. Wang(Boraginaceae), incorrectly cited as C. Y. Yang 700422 in the protologue, is actually C. Y. Yang 700442. The holotype of Glochisocaryum kansuense W. T. Wang(Boraginaceae), incorrectly cited as K. T. Fu 1989 in the protologue in Chinese, is actually K. T. Fu 1489; the former collection belongs to Asparagus sichuanicus S. C. Chen & D. Q. Liu(Liliaceae). The holotype of Microula trichocarpa(Maxim.) Johnst. var. macrantha W. T. Wang(Boraginaceae), incorrectly cited as H. Li 70287 in the protologue, is actually H. Li 72087; the former collection belongs to Rhododendron edgarianum Rehder & Wilson(Ericaceae). The holotype of Rabdosia latifolia C. Y. Wu & H. W. Li(Lamiaceae), incorrectly cited as K. L. Chu 2049 in the protologue, is actually K. L. Chu 2046; the former collection belongs to Rosa caudata Baker(Rosaceae). The holotype of Ancylostemon humilis W. T. Wang(Gesneriaceae), incorrectly cited as G. H. Yang 59063 in the protologue, is actually G. H. Yang 59043; the former collection belongs to Betula fargesii Franch. (Betulaceae). The holotype of Thladiantha villosula Cogn. var. nigrita A. M. Lu & Z. Y. Zhang(Cucurbitaceae) was wrongly cited as K. M. Feng 3439 in the protologue, but actually is K. M. Feng 3429; the former collection belongs to Bupleurum rockii H. Wolff(Apiaceae).

Key words: Boraginaceae, Lamiaceae, Gesneriaceae, Cucurbitaceae, protologue, typographical error

中图分类号: