欢迎访问《植物研究》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

植物研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 310-320.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.02.018

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    

中国11个双子叶植物原白中排印错误之更正

林云1, 毕海燕2, 李超3, 云映霞1   

  1. 1. 湖南省医药技工学校, 湖南食品药品职业学院, 长沙 410208;
    2. 北京自然博物馆, 北京 100050;
    3. 华北理工大学生命科学学院, 唐山 063210
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-12 出版日期:2019-03-05 发布日期:2019-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 毕海燕 E-mail:rubybi@126.com
  • 作者简介:林云(1987-),男,硕士,讲师,主要从事植物学工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技基础条件平台-标本资源共享平台建设项目(2005DKA21401)资助

Correction of Typographical Errors in the Protologue of Eleven Taxa(Dicotyledon) in China

LIN Yun1, BI Hai-Yan2, LI Chao3, YUN Ying-Xia1   

  1. 1. Hunan Medication Vestibule School, Hunan Food and Drug Vocational College, Changsha 410208;
    2. Beijing Museum of Natural History, Beijing 100050;
    3. College of Biology, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210
  • Received:2018-09-12 Online:2019-03-05 Published:2019-03-20
  • Supported by:
    Plant Specimen Digitization and Chinese Virtual Herbarium Establishment(2005DKA21401)

摘要: 对我国11个双子叶植物(Dicotyledon)原白中模式标本引证的排印错误做了更正:砚山锥栗(壳斗科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为王启无84116,实际应为王启无84416,前者属于菊科植物Inuna helianthus-aquatica C.Y.Wu ex Ling。长果柯(壳斗科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为K.M.Feng 13012,实际应为K.M.Feng 13102,前者属于冬青科植物Ilex triflora Bl.。福建红小麻(荨麻科)原白中错误地将主模式标本引证为C.J.Chen&Z.Y.Li 109,实际应为C.J.Chen&Z.Y.Li 103,前者属于荨麻科植物Oreocnide frutescens(Thunb.)Miq.。少毛全缘叶紫麻(荨麻科)原白中错误地将主模式标本引证为N.K.Chun 44099,实际应为N.K.Chun 44033,前者属于杜鹃花科植物Lyonia ovalifolia(Wallich)Drude var.rubrovenia(Merr.)Judd.。甘南铁线莲(毛茛科)原白中错误地将主模式标本引证为Baishuijiang Exped.4490,实际应为Baishuijiang Exped.4990,前者属于卫矛科植物Euonymus alatus(Thunb.)Sieb.。矮粗距翠雀花(毛茛科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为Sichuan Veg.Exped.3137,实际应为Sichuan Veg.Exped.3173,前者属于龙胆科植物Gentiana conduplicata T.N.Ho。镇康黄芪(豆科)原白中错误地将主模式标本引证为T.T.Yu 17255,实际应为T.T.Yu 17225,前者属于莎草科植物Scirpus lushanensis Ohwi。宽翼棘豆(豆科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为Qinghai-Xizang Comp.Exped.9484,实际应为Qinghai-Xizang Comp.Exped.9485,前者属于石竹科植物Arenaria kansuensis Maxim.。肾瓣黄芪(豆科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为Qinghai-Xizang Comp.Exped.3650,实际应为Qinghai-Xizang Comp.Exped.3605,前者属于麻黄科植物Ephedra gerardiana Wall.ex Mey.。湖南长柄槭(槭树科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为李泽棠2944,实际应为李泽棠2994,前者属于杜鹃花科植物Pieris formosa D.Don。峨眉勾儿茶(鼠李科)原白中错误地将模式标本引证为杨光辉54729,实际应为杨光辉54723,前者属于山茱萸科植物Helwingia chinensis Batalin.。

关键词: 双子叶植物, 原白, 排印错误

Abstract: We correct the typographical errors in the protologues of eleven taxa(Dicotyledon) in China. The type of Castanopsis yanshanensis Hu(Fagaceae), incorrectly cited as C.W.Wang 84116 in the protologue, is actually C.W.Wang 84416; the former collection belongs to Inuna helianthus-aquatica C.Y.Wu ex Ling(Asteraceae). The type of Pasania longinux Hu(Fagaceae), incorrectly cited as K.M.Feng 13012 in the protologue, is actually K.M.Feng 13102; the former collection belongs to Ilex triflora Bl.(Aquifoliaceae). The holotype of Laportea fujianensis C.J.Chen(Urticaceae), incorrectly cited as C.J.Chen & Z.Y.Li 109 in the protologue, is actually C.J.Chen & Z.Y.Li 103; the former collection belongs to a species of Oreocnide frutescens(Thunb.) Miq.(Urticaceae). The holotype of Oreocnide integrifolia(Gaudich.) Miq. subsp.subglabra C.J.Chen(Urticaceae), incorrectly cited as N.K.Chun 44099 in the protologue, is actually N.K.Chun 44033; the former collection belongs to Lyonia ovalifolia(Wallich) Drude var. rubrovenia(Merr.) Judd.(Ericaceae). The holotype of Clematis austrogansuensis W.T.Wang & L.Q.Li(Ranunculaceae), incorrectly cited as Baishuijiang Exped. 4490 in the protologue, is actually Baishuijiang Exped. 4990; the former collection belongs to Euonymus alatus(Thunb.) Sieb.(Celastraceae). The type of Delphinium pachycentrum Hemsl. var. humilius W.T.Wang(Ranunculaceae) was wrongly cited as Sichuan Veg. Exped. 3137in the protologue, but actually is Sichuan Veg. Exped. 3173; the former collection belongs to Gentiana conduplicata T.N.Ho(Gentianaceae).The holotype of Astragalus chengkangensis Podlech & L.R.Xu(Fabaceae), incorrectly cited as T.T.Yu 17255 in the protologue, is actually T.T.Yu 17225; the former collection belongs to Scirpus lushanensis Ohwi(Cyperaceae). The type of Oxytropis latialata P.C.Li(Fabaceae), incorrectly cited as Qinghai-Xizang Comp. Exped. 9484 in the protologue, is actually Qinghai-Xizang Comp. Exped. 9485; the former collection belongs to Arenaria kansuensis Maxim.(Caryophyllaceae). The type of Oxytropis reniformis P.C.Li(Fabaceae), incorrectly cited as Qinghai-Xizang Comp. Exped.3650 in the protologue, is actually Qinghai-Xizang Comp. Exped.3605; the former collection belongs to a species of Ephedra gerardiana Wall. ex Mey.(Ephedraceae). The type of Acer longipes Franch. ex Rehd. var. hunanense W.P.Fang & W.K.Hu(Aceraceae), incorrectly cited as Z.T.Lee 2944 in the protologue, is actually Z.T.Lee 2994; the former collection belongs to Pieris formosa D.Don(Ericaceae). The type of Berchemia omeiensis W.P.Fang ex Y.L.Chen & P.K.Chou(Rhamnaceae), incorrectly cited as G.H.Yang 54729 in the protologue, is actually G.H.Yang 54723; the former collection belongs to Helwingia chinensis Batalin.(Cornaceae).

Key words: Dicotyledon, protologue, typographical error

中图分类号: