基于ITS和matK基因对牡丹组序列分析及其亲缘关系的研究

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.04.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以芍药属牡丹组全部9个野生种、5个紫斑牡丹栽培品种及3个中原牡丹品种为试材，进行核糖体内转录间隔区（ITS）和叶绿体成熟酶K （matK）基因片段测序分析，探讨ITS和matK序列为牡丹组所有野生种种间关系提供分子证据。从GeneBank中选取了1个牡丹及3个外类群芍药、川赤芍和草芍药的ITS及matK序列。对试验样品进行DNA提取、PCR扩增并双向测序得到44条序列，人工校正后将所得44条序列进行比对；计算碱基组成频率、变异位点、简约信息位点数、转换/颠换比率、种内及种间遗传距离，以邻接法进行系统发育分析。结果表明，牡丹组所有个体ITS序列长度在750~800 bp，含有86个多态位点，74个简约信息位点，转换/颠换比率（R）为1.2；而matK序列含有20个简约信息位点，转换/颠换比率（R）为1.7。ITS序列分析将牡丹组野生种分为两大枝，稷山牡丹、紫斑牡丹、卵叶牡丹和杨山牡丹聚为一枝，狭叶牡丹、滇牡丹、黄牡丹和大花黄牡丹聚为另一枝，这两枝分别与革质花盘亚组和肉质花盘亚组相对应，而四川牡丹位于革质花盘亚组最底端，支持前人研究将四川牡丹归为革质花盘亚组。matK序列分析的牡丹组野生种间遗传距离结果不理想，未能清晰的表明野生种之间的亲缘关系。由此说明，ITS序列更适合牡丹组野生种间亲缘关系的研究分析。

关键词: 牡丹组, ITS, matK, 亲缘关系

Abstract: Revealing the interspecific relationship between wild species of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC at molecular evidences would provide theoretical basis for preserving and utilizing wild peony resources. The sequence of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer(ITS) and the coding region of the matK gene sequenced from 9 Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC, 5 cultivars of P.rockii, and 3 accessions of P.suffriticosa. Sequences of ITS and matK of one P.suffruticosa, one P.delavayi and three outgroups of P.lactiflora,P.veitchii and P.obovata were retrieved from GeneBank. The 44 sequences were obtained and corrected, and the divergences, variable sites, parsim-informative sites, the ratio of transition to transversion(R) and pairwise distances were analyzed. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted by Neighbor-joining(NJ) method. The size of ITS sequences of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC wild species and cultivars ranged from 750 to 800 bp containing 86 polymorphic sites and 74 parsim-informative sites with R of 1.2, whereas, their matK sequences encompassing 20 parsim-informative sites with R of 1.7. From the phylogenetic trees of ITS, P.jishanensis, P.rockii, P.qiui and P.ostii fell into a large clade. The similarity coefficients between P.ludlowii, and the species of P.lutea, P.potaninii and P.delavayi were clustered in another clade. These two clades corresponded well to Subsect. P.decomposita were at the bottom of Subsect. Vaginatae, which showed the classification of P.decomposita into Subsect Vaginatae. By matK sequences analysis, there is closely genetic distance between wild species from Paeonia Sec. Moutan DC; however, there was no clear genetic relationships between wild species. As a result, ITS sequence can be better used to study interspecific relationship among wild species of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC.

Key words: Paeonia Sect.Moutan DC, ITS, matK, genetic relationship

中图分类号:

S567.1+5

丑欢欢, 唐红. 基于ITS和matK基因对牡丹组序列分析及其亲缘关系的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(4): 603-612.

CHOU Huan-Huan, TANG Hong. Interspecific Relationship among the Wild Species of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC with ITS and matK Sequence[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(4): 603-612.

参考文献

1. 赵宣. 芍药属牡丹组(Paeonia sect. Moutan)种间关系及栽培牡丹的起源[D]. 重庆:西南大学,2007.Zhao X. Phylogenetic relationship among the speices of sect. Moutan and origin of cultivated tree peony[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University,2007.
2. 中国牡丹全书编纂委员会. 中国牡丹全书[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社,2002:1-310.The Chinese Peony Encyclopedia Compilation Committee. The Chinese peony encyclopedia[M]. Beijing:China Science and Technology Press,2002:1-310.
3. 洪德元,潘开玉. 芍药属牡丹组的分类历史和分类处理[J]. 植物分类学报,1999,37(4):351-368.Hong D Y,Pan K Y. Taxonomical history and revision of Paeonia sect. Moutan(Paeoniaceae)[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1999,37(4):351-368.
4. 于玲,何丽霞. 紫斑牡丹小孢子形成过程的细胞遗传学研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2000,20(3):467-471. Yu L,He L X. Cytogenetic study on microspore formative process of Paeonia rockii[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2000,20(3):467-471.
5. 席以珍. 中国芍药属花粉形态及其外壁超微结构的观察[J]. 植物学报,1984,26(3):241-246.Xi Y Z. The pollen morphology and exine ultrastructure of Paeonia l. in China[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica,1984,26(3):241-246.
6. 潘开玉. 芍药科分布格局及其形成的分析[J]. 植物分类学报,1995,33(4):340-349.Pan K Y. The analysis of distribution pattern in the Paeoniaceae and its formation[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1995,33(4):340-349.
7. 邹喻苹,蔡美琳,王子平. 芍药属牡丹组的系统学研究—基于RAPD分析[J]. 植物分类学报,1999,37(3):220-227. Zou Y P,Cai M L,Wang Z P. Systematic studies on Paeonia sect. Moutan DC. based on RAPD analysis[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1999,37(3):220-227.
8. Sang T,Crawford D J,Stuessy T F. Documentation of reticulate evolution in peonies(Paeonia) using internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA:implications for biogeography and concerted evolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1995,92(15):6813-6817.
9. Sang T,Donoghue M J,Zhang D. Evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase genes in peonies(Paeonia):phylogenetic relationships of putative nonhybrid species[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,1997,14(10):994-1007.
10. Ferguson D,Sang T. Speciation through homoploid hybridization between allotetraploids in peonies(Paeonia)[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2001,98(7):3915-3919.
11. Tank D C,Sang T. Phylogenetic utility of the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene:evolution and implications in Paeonia(Paeoni-aceae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2001,19(3):421-429.
12. 林启冰,周志钦,赵宣,等. 基于Adh基因家族序列的牡丹组(Sect. Moutan DC.)种间关系[J]. 园艺学报,2004,31(5):627-632.Lin Q B,Zhou Z Q,Zhao X,et al. Interspecific relationships among the wild species of Paeonia Sect. Moutan DC. based on DNA sequences of Adh Gene family[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2004,31(5):627-632.
13. 赵宣,周志钦,林启冰,等. 芍药属牡丹组(Paeonia sect. Moutan)种间关系的分子证据:GPAT基因的PCR-RFLP和序列分析[J]. 植物分类学报,2004,42(3):236-244.Zhao X,Zhou Z Q,Lin Q B,et al. Molecular evidence for the interspecific relationships in Paeonia sect. Moutan:PCR_RFLP and sequence analysis of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase(GPAT) gene[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,2004,42(3):236-244.
14. 张金梅,王建秀,夏涛,等. 基于系统发育分析的DNA条形码技术在澄清芍药属牡丹组物种问题中的应用[J]. 中国科学(C辑:生命科学),2008,38(12):1166-1176.Zhang J M,Wang J X,Xia T,et al. DNA barcoding:species delimitation in tree peonies[J]. Science in China Series C:Life Sciences,2009,52(6):568-578.
15. 李学营,彭建营,白瑞霞. 基于核rDNA的ITS序列在种子植物系统发育研究中的应用[J]. 西北植物学报,2005,25(4):829-834.Li X Y,Peng J Y,Bai R X. Use of ITS sequences based on nuclear rDNA for phylogenetic research of seed plants[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica,2005,25(4):829-834.
16. 朱元娣,曹敏格,许正,等. 基于ITS和matK序列探讨新疆野苹果与中国苹果的系统演化关系[J]. 园艺学报,2014,41(2):227-239.Zhu Y D,Cao M G,Xu Z,et al. Phylogenetic relationship between Xinjiang wild apple(Malus sieversii Roem.) and Chinese apple(Malus×domestica subsp. chinesnsis) based on ITS and matK sequences[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2014,41(2):227-239.
17. 赵宣,周志钦,林启冰,等. 基于多基因序列和形态性状的牡丹组种间关系(英文)[J]. 植物分类学报,2008,46(4):563-572. Zhao X,Zhou Z Q,Lin Q B,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Paeonia sect. Moutan(Paeoniaceae) based on multiple DNA fragments and morphological data[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution,2008,46(4):563-572.
18. Yan H F,Hao G,Hu C M,et al. DNA barcoding in closely related species:A case study of Primula L. sect. Proliferae Pax(Primulaceae) in China[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution,2011,49(3):225-236.
19. Fu Y M,Jiang W M,Fu C X. Identification of species within Tetrastigma(Miq.) Planch. (Vitaceae) based on DNA barcoding techniques[J]. Journal of Systematics and Evolution,2011,49(3):237-245.
20. 任保青,陈之端. 植物DNA条形码技术[J]. 植物学报,2010,45(1):1-12.Ren B Q,Chen Z R. DNA barcoding plant life[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany,2010,45(1):1-12.
21. 于玲,何丽霞,李嘉珏,等. 牡丹野生种间蛋白质谱带的比较研究[J]. 园艺学报,1998,25(1):99-101.Yu L,He L X,Li J J,et al. Comparative studies on protein zones of wild tree peony species[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,1998,25(1):99-101.
22. 邹喻苹,蔡美琳,张志宪,等. 矮牡丹的遗传多样性与保护对策[J]. 自然科学进展,1999,9(5):469-472.Zou Y P,Cai M L,Zhang Z X,et al. Genetic diversity and protection countermeasure of Paeonia suffruticosa subsp. Spontanea[J]. Progress in Natural Science,1999,9(5):469-472.
23. 袁涛,王莲英. 中国栽培牡丹起源的形态分析[J]. 山东林业科技,2004(6):1-3.Yuan T,Wang L Y. Morphologic analysis on the origin of Chinese peony cultivars[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology,2004(6):1-3.
24. 袁涛,王莲英. 我国芍药属牡丹组革质花盘亚组的形态学研究[J]. 园艺学报,2003,30(2):187-191.Yuan T,Wang L Y. Morphological studies on Paeonia Sect. Moutan subsect vagiatae in China[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica,2003,30(2):187-191.
25. 孟丽. 部分野生、栽培牡丹种质资源亲缘关系的RAPD研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2003.Meng L. Phylogenetic Relationship analyzed using RAPD makers among partial germplasm of Paeonia sect. Moutan[D]. Tai’an:Shandong Agricultural University,2003.
26. Sang T,Zhang D M. Reconstructing hybrid speciation using sequences of low copy nuclear genes:hybrid origins of five Paeonia species based on ADH gene phylogenies[J]. Systematic Botany,1999,24(2):148-163.
27. 成仿云,李嘉珏,陈德忠,等. 中国紫斑牡丹[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2005.Cheng F Y,Li J J,Cheng D Z,et al.. Chinese flare Mudan[M]. Beijing:China Forestry Publishing,2005.
28. 李嘉珏. 中国牡丹起源的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,1998,20(2):22-26.Li J J. Studies on the origin of Chinese Mudan(Tree Peony)[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University,1998,20(2):22-26.
29. 何丽霞,李睿,李嘉珏,等. 中国野生牡丹花粉形态的研究[J]. 兰州大学学报,2005,41(4):43-49.He L X,Li R,Li J J,et al. Studies on pollen morphology of the wild peony[J]. Journal of Lanzhou University,2005,41(4):43-49.
30. 洪涛,张家勋,李嘉珏,等. 中国野生牡丹研究(一)芍药属牡丹组新分类群[J]. 植物研究,1992,12(3):223-234.Hong T,Zhang J X,Li J J,et al. Study on the Chinese wild woody peonies(Ⅰ) new taxa of Paeonia L. sect. Moutan DC[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,1992,12(3):223-234.
31. 周仁超,姚崇怀. 芍药属牡丹组革质花盘亚组的系统演化探讨[J]. 植物研究,2002,22(1):72-75.Zhou R C,Yao C H. Studies on phylogeny of Paeonia section Moutan subsection vaginatae[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2002,22(1):72-75.
32. 王越岚. 牡丹的杂交育种及组间杂种育性的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2009.Wang Y L. Cross-breeding in tree peony and fertility research of intersectional hybrids[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University,2009.
33. 何丽霞,李睿,张延东,等. 牡丹杂交育种试验研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2011,36(3):1-6,20.He L X,Li R,Zhang Y D,et al. Study on cross breeding new cultivars of tree-peony[J]. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology,2011,36(3):1-6,20.
34. 施季森,王占军,陈金慧. 木本植物全基因组测序研究进展[J]. 遗传,2012,34(2):145-156.Shi J S,Wang Z J,Chen J H. Progress on whole genome sequencing in woody plants[J]. Hereditas,2012,34(2):145-156.
35. 黎裕,李英慧,杨庆文,等. 基于基因组学的作物种质资源研究:现状与展望[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(17):3333-3353.Li Y,Li Y H,Yang Q W,et al. Genomics-based crop germplasm research:advances and perspectives[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2015,48(17):3333-3353.

[1]	过雪莹, 朱凯琳, 陈昕, 付雪晴, 唐东芹. 6个香雪兰品种的染色体核型及聚类分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 637-646.
[2]	杨斌, 孟庆瑶, 张凯, 段义忠. 孑遗濒危植物矮扁桃叶绿体全基因组特征分析及亲缘关系鉴定[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(5): 686-695.
[3]	巫伟峰, 沈玺龙, 陈哲, 杨鼎元, 李永霞, 王瑶, 张群英. 悬钩子属DNA条形码通用序列的初步筛选[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(2): 301-307.
[4]	孙忆, 丁苏芹, 史益敏, 唐东芹. 15个小苍兰品种的花粉形态研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(1): 17-26.
[5]	林立；王志龙*；付涛；林乐静. 39个樱花品种亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(2): 297-304.
[6]	傅建敏1,2；梁晋军1,2；乌云塔娜1,2；梁玉琴1,2；孙鹏1,2；李芳东1,2. 基于叶绿体DNA ndh*A和nrDNA ITS序列变异分析栽培柿及其近缘种亲缘关系[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(4): 515-520.
[7]	饶龙兵1；杨汉波1；郭洪英2；段红平3；陈益泰1. 17种桤木属植物的亲缘关系研究及模糊种鉴定[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(4): 528-534.
[8]	李晓玲；杨进；张雄；王雪松. 10份续断属植物亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(3): 450-456.
[9]	胡仲义;林立;刘夔;曾传圣. 26个川茶花品种亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(5): 629-634.
[10]	陈燕英;黎云祥*;权秋梅;廖兴利;成仙鸽. 7种川产淫羊藿属植物遗传多样性及亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2012, 32(2): 208-212.
[11]	肖黎;李晓玲;王玉兵;王希群;陈发菊*. 22种木莲属植物亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2011, 31(4): 489-494.
[12]	杨帆;曾丽*;叶康;赵子刚;张嫔;龚霄雯;尹勤;孙强. 17份蔷薇属植物的亲缘关系的形态学和ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2011, 31(2): 193-198.
[13]	姚庆荣;赵长增;王文泉*. 海南部分荔枝种质资源亲缘关系的SSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(5): 628-632.
[14]	贺随超;马履一*. 红花玉兰与玉兰亚属几个种亲缘关系的AFLP分析[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(3): 288-292.
[15]	王铁娟;韩国栋. 中国蒿属沙生地理替代种亲缘关系的RAPD分析[J]. 植物研究, 2007, 27(4): 449-454.