17种桤木属植物的亲缘关系研究及模糊种鉴定

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2015.04.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用AFLP分子标记结合形态学指标，采用UPGMA法进行聚类分析，对桤木属17个种57份材料进行了亲缘关系研究及一个模糊种鉴定。结果表明：7对引物扩增出369条带，其中346个多态位点，多态位点百分率为93.77%；根据AFLP标记位点聚类分析，在相似系数为0.782时，17种桤木属植物可分为4类，第一类为日本桤木(Alnus japonica)；第二类为绿桤木(A.viridis)、意大利桤木(A.cordata)、欧洲桤木(A.glutinosa)、模糊种、四川桤木(A.cremastogyne)、江南桤木(A.trabeculosa)、斑点桤木(A.incana ssp.rugosa)、东北亚灰桤木(A.hirsuta)、台湾桤木(A.formosana)、日本特有桤木(A.firma)和裂叶桤木(A.sinuata)；第三类为灰桤木(A.incana)、红桤木(A.rubra)及薄叶桤木(A.tenifolia)；第四类喜马拉雅灰桤(A.nitida)和尼泊尔桤木(A.nepalensis)。根据形态学聚类分析，在距离为1.4时可分为三类，意大利桤木(A.cordata)单独为一类；日本桤木(A.japonica)、台湾桤木(A.formosana)、喜马拉雅灰桤木(A.nitida)、江南桤木(A.trabeculosa)和东北亚灰桤木(A.hirsuta)；第三类包括模糊种、灰桤木(A.incana)、斑点桤木(A.incana ssp.rugosa)、裂叶桤木(A.sinuata)、红桤木(A.rubra)、欧洲桤木(A.glutinosa)、绿桤木(A.viridis)、四川桤木(A.cremastogyne)、薄叶桤木(A.tenuifolia)和尼泊尔桤木(A.nepalensis)。经形态特征和AFLP分析鉴定模糊种为欧洲桤木。形态学聚类与AFLP聚类结果基本一致，但仍存在一定的差异，说明桤木属植物遗传背景丰富，种的分子分类地位和形态学分类地位具有一定的差异。

关键词: 桤木属, 亲缘关系, AFLP, 形态学

Abstract: We analyzed the genetic relationships of 17 Alnus, identified the uncertain species by AFLP markers and morphology data, and used UPGMA in clustering analysis. Seven primers were selected to conduct AFLP-PCR, and 369 DNA bands were obtained including 346 bands ofpolymorphism with93.77% of polymorphic bands. All these plants could be divided into four groups by AFLP cluster analysis: the first group was consisted of A.japonica;the second group was consisted of A.viridis, A.cordata, A.glutinosa, uncertain species, A.cremastogyne, A.trabeculosa, A.incana ssp.rugosa, A.hirsuta, A.formosana, A.firma and A.sinuata; the third group was consisted of A.incana, A.rubra and A.tenifolia; the fourth group was consisted of A.nitida and A.nepalensis. All these plants could be divided into three groups by morphology data: A.cordatawas the first group; the second group was consisted of A.japonica, A.formosana, A.nitida, A.hirsuta, A.trabeculosa; the third group was consisted of A.nepalensis, A.incana, uncertain species, A.incana ssp.rugosa, A.rubra, A.glutinosa, A.viridis, A.fima, A.tenifolia, A.sinuata and A.cremastogyne. The uncertain species was A.glutinosaby morphological and AFLP analysis.The results of morphological cluster analysis and AFLP cluster analysis were similar, but also had some difference, that is, Alnus hadvarious genetic background, and there were some differencesbetween the status of molecular and morphological classification between Alnus species.

Key words: Alnus, genetic relationship, AFLP, morphology

中图分类号:

饶龙兵1；杨汉波1；郭洪英2；段红平3；陈益泰1. 17种桤木属植物的亲缘关系研究及模糊种鉴定[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(4): 528-534.

RAO Long-Bing1；YANG Han-Bo1；GUO Hong-Ying2；DUAN Hong-Ping3；CHEN Yi-Tai1. Relationships of 17 Alnus and Identifying Uncertain Species[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2015, 35(4): 528-534.

参考文献

1.陈之端.桦木科植物的系统发育和地理分布（续）［J］.植物分类学报，1994,32（2）：101-153.

2.陈之端，路安民.桦木科植物的起源和早期演化［J］.中国科学院研究生院学报，1995,2（12）：199-204.

3.任保青.中国桤木属植物的细胞学研究［D］.雅安:四川农业大学.　　.

4.杨汉波，饶龙兵，郭洪英，等.5种桤木属植物的核型分析［J］.植物遗传资源学报，2013,14（6）：1203-1207.

5.饶龙兵，杨汉波，郭洪英，等.桤木属7种植物的核型分析［J］.西北植物学报，2013,33（7）：1333-1338.

6.Mejnartowicz L.Genetic variation within and among naturally regenerating populations of alder(Alnus glutinosa)［J］.Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae,2007,77:105-110.

7.Hamann A,EI-Kassaby Y A,Koshy M P,et al.Multivariate analysis of allozymic and quantitative trait variation in Alnus rubra:geographic patterns and evolutionary implications［J］.Can J For Res,1999,28:1557-1565.

8.Schrader J A,GravesW R.Systematics of Alnus maritime(seaside alder)resolved by ISSR polymorphisms and morphological characters［J］.J Am Soc Horic Sci,2004,129:231-236.

9.Gibson J P,Rice S A,Stucke C M.Comparison of population genetic diversity between a rare,narrowly distributed species and a common,widespread species of Alnus(Betulaceae)［J］.Am J Bot,2008,95:588-596.

10.Huh M K.Genetic diversity and population structure of Korean alder(Alnus japonica;Betulaceae)［J］.Can J For Res,1990,29:1311-1316.

11.Bousquet J,Cheliak W M,Lalonde M.Genetic differentiation among 22 populations of green alder(Alnus crispa) in central Quebec［J］.Can J For Res,1987,17:219-227.

12.Bousquet J,Cheliak W M,Lalonde M.Allozyme variation within and among mature populations of speckled alder(Alnus regosa) and relationships with green alder(Alnus crispa)［J］.Am J Bot,1988,75:1678-1686.

13.Chen Z D,Li J H.Phylogenetics and biogeography of Alnus(Betulaceae)inferred from sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region［J］.Int J Plant Sci,2004,165(2):235-335.

14.Kellison R C,White G.Black alder performace in the southeast［C］.//Proc.of Workshop on Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in the Management of Temperate Forests(Corvallis,Oregon),1979:345-355.

15.Furlow J J.The systematics of the American species of Alnus(Betulaceae)［J］.Rhodora,1979,81:1-121,151-248.

16.Murai S.Phytotaxonomical and geobotanical studies on gen.Alnus in JapanⅢ.Taxonomy of whole worldspecies and distribution of each sect［J］.Bulletin.Government Forest Experiment Station(Japanese),1964,171:1-107.

17.Hamrick J L,Godt M J W,Sherman-Broyles S L.Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species［J］.New Forest,1992,6:95-124.

18.Li P C,Cheng S X.Betulaceae［M］.//Kuang K Z,Li P C.Flora repularissinicae.Beijing:Science Press,1979:44-137.

[1]	魏博嘉, 张学文, 王幼芳, 赵建成, 李敏. 青藓科（Brachytheciaceae）植物假鳞毛形态及其分类学意义[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(5): 733-740.
[2]	肖佳伟, 王颖嘉, 黄文轩, 黎维平, 康公平. 长柄马兰（菊科）的形态补充描述及细胞学研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(5): 741-745.
[3]	马小磊, 贾留坤, 曹倩, 陈世龙, 高庆波. 虎耳草属异叶虎耳草复合群的数量分类学研究[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 536-543.
[4]	过雪莹, 朱凯琳, 陈昕, 付雪晴, 唐东芹. 6个香雪兰品种的染色体核型及聚类分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 637-646.
[5]	杨斌, 孟庆瑶, 张凯, 段义忠. 孑遗濒危植物矮扁桃叶绿体全基因组特征分析及亲缘关系鉴定[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(5): 686-695.
[6]	张玲, 张东来. 基于形态学及生理学的黄檗性别差异研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(6): 876-882.
[7]	孙忆, 丁苏芹, 史益敏, 唐东芹. 15个小苍兰品种的花粉形态研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(1): 17-26.
[8]	丑欢欢, 唐红. 基于ITS和matK基因对牡丹组序列分析及其亲缘关系的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(4): 603-612.
[9]	徐静静, 赵冰, 张良英, 申惠翡, 李厚华. 西藏地区雪层杜鹃遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(1): 88-95.
[10]	林立；王志龙*；付涛；林乐静. 39个樱花品种亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(2): 297-304.
[11]	鲁彦君1；Thomas Stützel2；康永祥1；王利兵3；于海燕3；张鑫1*. 澳洲杨（Homalanthus populifolius Graham）种皮气孔的发现与种皮气孔的进化学意义[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(5): 660-664.
[12]	傅建敏1,2；梁晋军1,2；乌云塔娜1,2；梁玉琴1,2；孙鹏1,2；李芳东1,2. 基于叶绿体DNA ndh*A和nrDNA ITS序列变异分析栽培柿及其近缘种亲缘关系[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(4): 515-520.
[13]	李晓玲；杨进；张雄；王雪松. 10份续断属植物亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(3): 450-456.
[14]	饶龙兵1；杨汉波1,2；郭洪英3；段红平2；陈益泰1. 不同倍性桤木属植物遗传差异的AFLP分析[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(6): 803-809.
[15]	胡仲义;林立;刘夔;曾传圣. 26个川茶花品种亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(5): 629-634.