松科植物属间C值和种子千粒重与进化关系初探

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2013.05.019

植物研究 ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 610-615.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2013.05.019

松科植物属间C值和种子千粒重与进化关系初探

李桂双；白成科^*

陕西师范大学生命科学学院，西安　710062

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2013-09-20 发布日期:2013-09-20
通讯作者: 白成科
基金资助:

Primary Study on Evolutional Correlation Analysis between the Plant C-Values and 1000-seed Weight of Different Genera in Pinaceae

LI Gui-Shuang;BAI Cheng-Ke*

College of Life Sciences,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an　710062

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-09-20 Published:2013-09-20
Contact: BAI Cheng-Ke
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在检索C值数据库和种子数据库的基础上，对松科具有完整C值和种子千粒重等数据信息的5个属108种植物进行统计分析，并利用线性回归模型分析了二者之间相关性。结果显示，松科植物C值从9.5~36 pg呈正态分布，种子千粒重从1.2~1 269 g呈偏态分布,种间千粒重相差悬殊，高达1058倍。ANOVA分析表明，松属C值平均为25.79 pg，显著高于其它4个属;落叶松属C值最低（12.53 pg)，显著低于云杉属（18.44 pg），而云杉属、冷杉属和雪松属C值间却无显著性差异。结合前人研究结果，从C值的角度分析，松科5属间的演化顺序为：松属→云杉属→雪松属→冷杉属→落叶松属。松科5属间种子千粒重均值差异显著，松属种子均值最大（123.7 g），其次为雪松属（84.5 g）和冷杉属（26.4 g），最后为落叶松属（5.5 g)和云杉属(3.9 g)。除松属外，其它4个属ANOVA分析，雪松属种子千粒重显著高于云杉属、冷杉属和落叶松属（P<0.01)，而云杉属和落叶松属种子千粒重间无显著差异(P>0.05)。对数回归分析和线性相关性分析表明，松科108种植物的C值和种子千粒重回归方程为：y=3.145x-7.248，决定系数（R²）为0.346，存在显著正相关性（P<0.000 1），线性相关系数(γ)高达58.8%，这说明松科植物随着C值增大，其种子千粒重呈明显增加趋势。综上所述，松科属间种子千粒重差异显著，且随着属间进化程度的提高，C值和种子千粒重均呈明显下降趋势，其具体机理尚有待于结合其它功能性状做深入分析。

关键词: 松科, C值, 种子千粒重, 回归分析, 进化

Abstract: It has been a very interesting study for international scientists to research the evolutional relationship between plant C-value and traits in families or genera. The data of C-value and 1000-seed weight were searched from Plant C-value Database and Seed Mass Information Database, respectively. The relationship was analyzed by ANOVA and regression model for 5 genera 108 species in Pinaceae. The results showed the C-value ranged from 9.5 to 36 pg in a reasonably normal distribution, and the 1000seed weight had a widest distribution from 1.2 to 1269 (approximate 1058 times). The ANOVA analysis results showed the Pinus had the highest mean C-value (25.79 pg) in 5 genera and was significantly higher than those of the other 4 genera. The mean C-value of Larix was the lowest (12.53 pg) and was significant lower than that of Picea (18.44 pg). There was no significant difference among C-values of Picea, Abies and Cedrus. For 5 genera in Pinaceae, there was an evolutional sequence: Pinus→Pieca→Cedrus→Abies→Larix, combining previous research results and our C-values analysis results. The differences of average 1000-seed weight in 5 genera was larger, and it was in the sequence of Pinus (123.7 g), Cedrus (84.5 g), Abies (26.4 g), Larix (5.5 g) and Picea (3.9 g). The 1000-seed weight of Pinus were remarkable higher than those of the others, and the 1000-seed weight of Cedrus were significant higher than those of Abies, Larix and Picea. However, there was no significant difference between Larix and Picea. Linear correlation analysis showed that there was a higher significantly positive correlation between C-value and 1000-seed weight (y=3.415x-7.248, R²=0.346, t-test, P<0.001) and the correlation coefficient was 58.8%, suggesting 1000-seed weight was increased with the C-value increasing in Pinaceae. In conclusion, all the results indicated that the C-value and 1000-seed weight would decline with the improving of evolutionary status, which were closely related to the geographic distribution and spread in Pinaceae. The specific mechanisms need to be further researched.

Key words: Pinaceae, C-value, 1000-seed weight, linear regression analysis, evolution

中图分类号:

S791.24

李桂双;白成科*. 松科植物属间C值和种子千粒重与进化关系初探[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(5): 610-615.

LI Gui-Shuang;BAI Cheng-Ke*. Primary Study on Evolutional Correlation Analysis between the Plant C-Values and 1000-seed Weight of Different Genera in Pinaceae[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2013, 33(5): 610-615.

[1]	胡夏宇, 刘玉萍, 苏旭, 杨萍, 王亚男. 苦豆子不同居群染色体数目及核型分析[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(1): 9-19.
[2]	穆赢通, 樊东昌, 吕丽娟, 李晓杰, 路景诗, 张晓明. 毛茛科和芍药科叶绿体基因组密码子特征和系统发育比较[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(6): 964-975.
[3]	夏铭泽, 张发起, 迟晓峰, 韩霜, 陈世龙. 梅花草属叶绿体基因组进化分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 626-636.
[4]	武泼泼, 张学杰, 张洛艳, 樊守金. 基于nrITS、psbA-trnH和DMC1序列中国短柄草族的系统进化和生物地理学研究[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(4): 497-505.
[5]	蒋福娟, 唐楠, 唐道城, 巨秀婷, 孙静清. 青藏高原东南部山丹nrDNA ITS和cpDNA petB/petD 序列的分子进化特点[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(1): 117-124.
[6]	何懿菡, 韩立敏, 刘玉萍, 田娜, 苏旭, 王喆之. 鼠尾草叶绿体基因组序列分析[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(4): 572-578.
[7]	赵青, 张强, 周鹏, 林峰, 方炎明. 5种木兰科植物的DNA-C值及倍性分析[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(6): 853-859.
[8]	李景浩, 李慧, 魏亚伟, 张淞著, 朱文旭, 邓继峰, 宋依璇, 周永斌. 樟子松、油松、蒙古栎水分利用效率种间变化及其对环境因子的响应差异[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(4): 581-587.
[9]	陈圆圆1,2；张晓琴2；秦雪梅1；李震宇1*. 黄芪判别预测的线性回归分析方法[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(6): 850-855.
[10]	李桂双;曹博;白成科*. 禾本科植物基因组大小与种子特性的相关性分析[J]. 植物研究, 2012, 32(6): 701-706.
[11]	栾卓;范亚文*;马跃. 松花江哈尔滨段水域硅藻植物与相关环境因子的回归分析及初步预测[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(3): 349-354.
[12]	张丽君;陈洁;王艇. 蕨类植物叶绿体rps*4基因的适应性进化分析[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(1): 42-50.
[13]	陈鹏飞;刘雪梅;*;宋福南;宋兴舜;刘霓;金微微;刘威. 白桦肌动蛋白(Actin)基因全长cDNA克隆与序列分析[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(3): 339-345.
[14]	曹　刚;周永红*;张海琴;康厚扬;邓小锋. 鹅观草属4个种的核型与进化[J]. 植物研究, 2006, 26(2): 141-146.
[15]	邵邻相, 张凤娟. 6种松科植物叶表皮的扫描电镜观察[J]. 植物研究, 2005, 25(3): 281-285.

松科植物属间C值和种子千粒重与进化关系初探

Primary Study on Evolutional Correlation Analysis between the Plant C-Values and 1000-seed Weight of Different Genera in Pinaceae

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价