农业活动对三江平原湿地主要植物种群生态位的影响

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.03.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农业活动是三江平原湿地主要干扰方式之一，长期的农业活动已对该区域湿地生态环境产生显著影响。本研究以三江平原退化湿地20种主要植物为研究对象，分析其在土壤含水量、土壤有机碳、全氮、碱解氮、全磷、速效磷、全钾、速效钾8个资源维上的生态位宽度及生态位重叠特征，揭示农业活动导致的生境退化对湿地主要植物种群生态位产生的影响。研究结果表明：优势种中，小叶章具有最大生态位宽度，漂筏苔草具有最小生态位宽度。伴生种中，球尾花具有最大生态位宽度。湿地植物对不同资源的利用能力存在差异。60%的湿地植物对土壤有机碳表现为较窄的生态位宽度，70%以上的湿地植物在土壤含水量、氮、磷、钾资源维具有较高的生态位宽度。优势种在土壤含水量、土壤有机碳和氮资源维表现出不同的生态位宽度和生态位重叠，这种差异是影响湿地优势物种分布和种群生态位分化的主要原因之一。农业活动导致的土壤养分的变化，会引起植物种群间对有限资源的竞争，成为影响植物群落物种组成和群落动态的关键因素。

关键词: 农业活动, 种群, 生态位宽度, 生态位重叠, 湿地

Abstract: Agricultural activities is one of the main disturbance styles in Sanjiang Plain, and the long-term agricultural activities had made a significant influence on the wetland environment. The 20 dominant species in Sanjiang Plain were selected to study its characteristics of niche breadth and niche overlap in 8 resources dimensions, including soil moisture, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, total phosphorus, available phosphorus, total potassium, available potassium, and soil organic carbon, and reveal the impact of agricultural activities on the niche of dominant plant populations. Deyeuxia angustifolia has the greatest niche breadth, and Carex lasiocarpa has the smallest niche breadth among the dominant species. Among the companion species, Lysimachia thyrsiflora has the greatest niche breadth. The 20 dominant species showed the difference in utilization of different resources dimensions. More than 60% species showed a narrow niche breadth in SOC, and more than 60% species showed a wide niche breadth in soil moisture, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. The dominant species showed the different niche breadth and niche overlap in soil moisture, SOC and N, and this differences are the main factors affecting the species distribution and population differentiation. The change of soil environment caused by agricultural activities would lead to the competition for limited resources among plant populations, and it would be also the key factors influencing the species composition and community dynamics.

Key words: agricultural activities, populations, niche breadth, niche overlap, wetland

中图分类号:

Q145+.1

韩明浩, 刘赢男, 周丹, 隋心, 倪红伟, 穆立蔷. 农业活动对三江平原湿地主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(3): 461-467.

HAN Ming-Hao, LIU Ying-Nan, ZHOU Dan, SUI Xin, NI Hong-Wei, MU Li-Qiang. Effects of Agricultural Activities on Niche of Main Wetland Plant Populations in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(3): 461-467.

参考文献

1. 孟焕,王琳,张仲胜,等. 气候变化对中国内陆湿地空间分布和主要生态功能的影响研究[J]. 湿地科学,2016,14(5):710-716.Meng H,Wang L,Zhang Z S,et al. Researches on the impacts of climate change on spatial distribution and main ecological functions of inland wetland ecosystem in China[J]. Wetland Science,2016,14(5):710-716.
2. 李建玮,王立新,王炜,等. 内蒙古高原典型草原区河漫滩湿地植物群落退化表征[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,2012,36(1):10-18.Li J W,Wang L X,Wang W,et al. Characterization of degradation of wetland plant communities on flood plain in typical steppe region of Inner Mongolia Plateau,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2012,2012,36(1):10-18.
3. 何贵永,孙浩智,史小明,等. 青藏高原高寒湿地不同季节土壤理化性质对放牧模式的响应[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(4):12-20.He G Y,Sun H Z,Shi X M,et al. Soil properties of Tibetan Plateau alpine wetland affected by grazing and season[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(4):12-20.
4. 邢亚蕾,魏天兴,葛根巴图. 鹫峰国家森林公园残次林物种多样性及生态位特征[J]. 植物研究,2015,35(6):915-922.Xing Y L,Wei T X,Ge G B T. Species diversity and niche characteristics of defective forest in Jiufeng national forest park[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2015,35(6):915-922.
5. 钟宇,张健,刘泉波,等. 巨桉人工林草本层主要种群的生态位分析[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(4):16-21.Zhong Y,Zhang J,Liu Q B,et al. Niche characteristics of main herbage populations in Eucalyptus grandis plantation[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2010,19(4):16-21.
6. 陈子萱,田福平,郑阳. 施肥对玛曲高寒沙化草地主要植物种生态位的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(5):884-888.Chen Z X,Tian F P,Zheng Y. Effects of fertilization on niche of main plant species in Maqu alpine desertification meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica,2011,19(5):884-888.
7. 宗宁,石培礼,蔣婧,等. 施肥和围栏封育对退化高寒草甸植被恢复的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2013,19(6):905-913.Zong N,Shi P L,Jiang J,et al. Effects of fertilization and grazing exclosure on vegetation recovery in a degraded alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology,2013,19(6):905-913.
8. 董全民,赵新全,马玉寿,等. 放牧对高寒小嵩草草甸冷季草场主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2006,28(6):10-17.Dong Q M,Zhao X Q,Ma Y S,et al. Effects of grazing on the major plant populations niche in alpine Kobrecia parva meadow cold-seasonal pastureland[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland,2006,28(6):10-17.
9. 郑伟,董全民,李世雄,等. 放牧对环青海湖高寒草原主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(12):2040-2046.Zheng W,Dong Q M,Li S X,et al. Effects of grazing on niche of major plant populations in alpine steppe in Qinghai Lake Region[J]. Pratacultural Science,2013,30(12):2040-2046.
10. 杨自辉,方峨天,刘虎俊,等. 民勤绿洲边缘地下水位变化对植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(11):4900-4906.Yang Z H,Fang E T,Liu H J,et al. Effect of water table to niche of plant population at Minqin oasis fringe[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(11):4900-4906.
11. 张金波,宋长春. 三江平原不同土地利用方式对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2004,35(3):371-373.Zhang J B,Song C C. Effects of different land-use on soil physical-chemical properties in the Sanjiang Plain[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2004,35(3):371-373.
12. 杨文燕,宋长春,栾兆擎,等. 干旱年份三江平原沼泽甲烷(CH₄)排放及影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志,2006,25(4):423-427.Yang W Y,Song C C,Luan Z Q,et al. Methane emission from freshwater marshes in Sanjiang Plain and its affecting factors in arid year[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2006,25(4):423-427.
13. 周旺明,王金达,刘景双,等. 三江平原不同土地利用方式对区域气候的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(5):155-158.Zhou W M,Wang J D,Liu J S,et al. Influence of different land-use to regional climate in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation,2005,19(5):155-158.
14. 王国栋,Middleton B A,吕宪国,等. 农田开垦对三江平原湿地土壤种子库影响及湿地恢复潜力[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(1):205-213.Wang G D,Middleton B A,Lü X G,et al. Effects of farming on wetland soil seed banks in the Sanjiang Plain and wetland restoration potential[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(1):205-213.
15. 张骁栋,康晓明,李春义,等. 排水对三江平原和若尔盖沼泽生态影响的比较[J]. 生态学杂志,2015,34(7):2030-2040.Zhang X D,Kang X M,Li C Y,et al. Comparison of the drainage effects on ecological characteristics in Sanjiang Plain and Zoige Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2015,34(7):2030-2040.
16. 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:107-108,147-150,166-168,179-183,188-190,193-195.Lu R K. Analysis of agriculturial chemistry in soil[M]. Beijing:Chinese Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000:107-108,147-150,166-168,179-183,188-190,193-195.
17. 刘加珍,陈亚宁,张元明. 塔里木河中游植物种群在四种环境梯度上的生态位特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2004,15(4):549-555.Liu J Z,Chen Y N,Zhang Y M. Niche characteristics of plants on four environmental gradients in middle reaches of Tarim River[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2004,15(4):549-555.
18. 董志玲,徐先英,金红喜,等. 生态输水对石羊河尾闾湖区植被的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(7):101-106.Dong Z L,Xu X Y,Jin H X,et al. The impact of eco-water transportation to the vegetation in tail lake of Shiyang River[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2015,29(7):101-106.
19. Fransen B,De Kroon H,Berendse F. Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters competition between two perennial grass species[J]. Ecology,2001,82(9):2534-2546.
20. Dolédec S,Chessel D,Gimaret-carpentier C. Niche separation in community analysis:A new method[J]. Ecology,2000,81(10):2914-2927.
21. Tilman D. Causes,consequences and ethics of biodiversity[J]. Nature,2000,405(6783):208-211.
22. Mcgrady-steed J,Morin P J. Biodiversity,density compensation,and the dynamics of populations and functional groups[J]. Ecology,2000,81(2):361-373.
23. 李明,蒋德明,押田敏雄,等. 科尔沁沙地人工固沙群落草本植物种群生态位特征[J]. 草业科学,2009,26(8):10-16.Li M,Jiang D M,Oshida T,et al. Niche characteristic of herbages in artificial sand-fixing communities in Horqin sandy land[J]. Pratacultural Science,2009,26(8):10-16.
24. 钱逸凡,伊力塔,胡军飞,等. 普陀山主要植物种生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2012,31(3):561-568.Qian Y F,Yi L T,Hu J F,et al. Niche characteristics of main plant species in Putuo Mountain,Zhejiang Province of East China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(3):561-568.
25. 石红霄,侯向阳,师尚礼,等. 高山嵩草草甸初级生产力、多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(10):40-47.Shi H X,Hou X Y,Shi S L,et al. Relationships between plant diversity,soil property and productivity in an alpine meadow[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(10):40-47.

[1]	杨航美, 李丽萍, 孙梅, 陈弘毅, 李玲艳, 冯春慧. 香蒲叶功能性状对模拟增温和CO₂浓度倍增的响应[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(5): 729-740.
[2]	张孟文, 钟才荣, 吕晓波, 方赞山, 程成. 3种海桑属濒危红树植物的种群结构与动态特征[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(2): 231-241.
[3]	杨磊, 曹秋梅, 冯缨, 李文军. 珍稀濒危植物阜康阿魏的遗传多样性及遗传结构[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(1): 51-58.
[4]	付鹏程, 韦秋前, 史明艳. 青藏高原岷县龙胆的遗传分化与种群动态历史分析[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(4): 556-564.
[5]	高启阳, 黄宇龙, 郭文冰, 赵奋成, 刘阳. 碳源等因素对湿地松优良无性系胚性愈伤组织增殖的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(1): 21-28.
[6]	刘济明, 刘欢, 李丽霞. 米槁群落主要物种资源利用特征分析[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(3): 380-386.
[7]	段义忠, 王海涛, 张格格, 严伟娜. 基于ISSR分子标记的孑遗濒危植物四合木遗传结构分析[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(3): 466-473.
[8]	傅国林, 李婷婷, 张晔华, 文香英, 马学初, 吴初平. 极小种群浙江安息香的物候观测[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(2): 168-173.
[9]	王飞, 霍怀成, 赵阳, 曹秀文, 刘锦乾, 杨永红, 张涛, 齐昊, 王若鉴. 甘南高山林线岷江冷杉—杜鹃种群结构与动态[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 664-672.
[10]	张腾驹, 陈小红, 刘静, 康喜坤. 四川省不同天然种群珙桐叶片解剖结构与其耐热性的关系[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(2): 208-221.
[11]	谭海霞, 金照光, 孙富强, 彭红丽, 杨卓, 耿世刚. 滦河口典型盐生植物的生态化学计量特征研究[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(6): 956-960.
[12]	周泽建, 刘妮妮, 伍冰倩, 张红, 赵珩. 3种速生树种落叶水浸提液对走马胎幼苗生长的化感效应[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(4): 568-574.
[13]	徐静静, 赵冰, 张良英, 申惠翡, 李厚华. 西藏地区雪层杜鹃遗传多样性的AFLP分析[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(1): 88-95.
[14]	吕朝燕, 张希明, 高智席, 熊佰炼, 韩畅, 王加真. 准噶尔盆地梭梭土壤种子库基本特征[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(1): 109-117.
[15]	李金昕1；吴定军2；章世鹏2；何显湘2；陈坚2；史清茂2；胥晓1*. 四川米仓山自然保护区台湾水青冈种群生命表及动态分析[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(1): 68-74.