›› 2006, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 53-57.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.01.012
• 论文 • 上一篇 下一篇
林 祁
收稿日期:
修回日期:
出版日期:
发布日期:
通讯作者:
LIN Qi
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Contact:
摘要： 孙成仁在2002年《植物分类学报》第40卷第2期“五味子科植物种子表面微形态及其系统学意义”一文中对林祁(2000)所做的五味子科分类学修订提出了不同的看法。本文对此作出解答，认为由于双方在实验材料、实验方法、实验结果、植物分类学研究方法等方面存在差异，从而得出不同的研究结论。
关键词: 五味子科, 种子形态
Abstract: Different research results have been put forward by C. R. Sun in the thesis,“Micromorphological features of the seed surface of Schisandraceae and their systematic significance”from Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2002, 40(2): 97-109. Because of difference among experimental materials, methods, results and taxonomic research methods, both sides get different research results. This paper will discuss it.
Key words: Schisandraceae, seed morphology, taxonomy
林 祁. 对孙成仁的“五味子科植物种子表面微形态及其系统学意义”一文之商榷[J]. , 2006, 26(1): 53-57.
LIN Qi. Discussions on “Micromorphological features of the seed surface of Schisandraceae and their systematic significance” put forwarded by SUN Cheng-Ren[J]. , 2006, 26(1): 53-57.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://bbr.nefu.edu.cn/CN/10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.01.012
https://bbr.nefu.edu.cn/CN/Y2006/V26/I1/53
