高寒草甸不同演替阶段植物叶片功能性状研究

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以甘南高寒草甸演替过程中5个阶段的典型群落为研究对象，对围封样地内不同演替阶段群落叶片功能性状进行比较，分析了围封地内各演替阶段群落水平上主要物种叶性状与环境因子的关系。结果显示：（1）此围封地形成了一个从草本到灌木的演替过程。随着演替的进行，Margalef指数显著增加，Shannon-Wiener指数呈先增加后降低的趋势。（2）从演替前期到演替后期，土壤有机碳（SOC）、土壤全氮（STN）、土壤含水量（SWC）逐渐升高，光照度（LI）、土壤温度（ST）逐渐降低，土壤全磷（STP）呈先降低后增加趋势；叶片有机碳（LCC）、全氮（LNC）、含水量（LWC）逐渐升高；比叶面积（SLA）、磷利用效率（PUPE）、稳定碳同位素（δ¹³C）逐渐下降，叶片全磷（LPC）先降低后升高，而氮利用效率（PUNE）先升高后降低。（3）RDA冗余分析表明，在此围封样地内，演替前期植物群落叶性状主要受到LI和ST的限制作用。而在演替的中后期SWC是主要影响因子。此研究有助于我们认识高寒草甸生态系统的退化过程所导致的生态环境问题，进而寻求更好的草地恢复和重建方法。

关键词: 植物叶片性状, 环境因子, 群落演替, 高寒草甸

Abstract: We studied the typical communities in five stages of alpine meadow succession in Gannan. The leaf functionaltraits of different succession stages in enclosed plots were compared, and the relationship between leaf characteristics of main species and environmental factors at community level in each succession stage were analyzed. The results showed that:(1)The enclosure formed a succession process from herbs to shrubs. As the succession progresses, Margalef index increased significantly and Shannon-Wiener index increased first and then decreased. (2)With the succession, soil organic carbon(SOC), soil total nitrogen(STN), soil water content(SWC) gradually increased, light intensity(LI), soil temperature(ST) gradually decreased, soil total phosphorus(STP) decreased first and then increased; leaf organic carbon(LCC), leaf total nitrogen(LNC), water content(LWC) gradually increased; specific leaf area(SLA), phosphorus utilization efficiency(PUPE) and stable carbon isotope(δ¹³C) decreased gradually, leaf total phosphorus(LPC) decreased first and then increased, while nitrogen use efficiency(PUNE) first increased and then decreased. (3)By RDA analysis, in the enclosed plot, leaf traits of plants communities in the early stage of succession were mainly restricted by LI and ST, and leaf traits of plants communities in the middle and late stages of succession were mainly restricted by SWC. The study of community succession and functional changes of plant leaves in enclosed areas will help us to understand the degradation of alpine meadow ecosystem and the decline of biodiversity, and to seek better methods of grassland restoration and reconstruction.

Key words: plant leaf functional traits, environmental factors, succession, alpine meadow

中图分类号:

S155.2+92

刘旻霞, 李俐蓉, 车应弟, 焦骄. 高寒草甸不同演替阶段植物叶片功能性状研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 760-769.

LIU Min-Xia, LI Li-Rong, CHE Ying-Di, JIAO Jiao. Functional Traits of Plant Leaves at Different Succession Stages in Alpine Meadow[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(5): 760-769.

参考文献

1. Violle C,Navas M L,Vile D,et al. Let the concept of trait be functional![J]. Oikos,2007,116(5):882-892.
2. 胡耀升,么旭阳,刘艳红. 长白山不同演替阶段森林植物功能性状及其与地形因子间的关系[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(20):5915-5924. Hu Y S,Yao X Y,Liu Y H. The functional traits of forests at different succession stages and their relationshipto terrain factors in Changbai Mountains[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(20):5915-5924.
3. Kazakou E,Vile D,Shipley B,et al. Co-variations in litter decomposition,leaf traits and plant growth in species from a Mediterranean old-field succession[J]. Functional Ecology,2006,20(1):21-30.
4. 石福孙,陈华峰,吴宁. 增温对川西北亚高山高寒草甸植物群落碳、氮含量的影响[J]. 植物研究,2008,28(6):730-736. Shi F S,Chen H F,Wu N. Effect of experimental warming on carbon and nitrogen content of sub-alpine meadow in Northwestern Sichuan[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2008,28(6):730-736.
5. Reich P B,Uhl C,Walters M B,et al. Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 Amazonian tree species[J]. Oecologia,1991,86(1):16-24.
6. 刘旻霞,马建祖. 甘南高寒草甸植物功能性状和土壤因子对坡向的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(12):3295-3300. Liu M X,Ma J Z. Responses of plant functional traits and soil factors to slope aspect in alpine meadow of SouthGansu,Northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,23(12):3295-3300.
7. 卜文圣,臧润国,丁易,等. 海南岛热带低地雨林群落水平植物功能性状与环境因子相关性随演替阶段的变化[J]. 生物多样性,2013,21(3):278-287. Bu W S,Zang R G,Ding Y,et al. Relationships between plant functional traits at the community level and environmental factors during succession in a tropical lowland rainforest on Hainan Island,South China[J]. Biodiversity Science,2013,21(3):278-287.
8. 刘琳,吴彦,孙庚,等. 季节性雪被对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸2种优势植物碳、氮积累和分配的影响[J]. 植物研究,2011,31(4):451-460. Liu L,Wu Y,Sun G,et al. Effects of seasonal snow cover on carbon,nitrogen accumulation and distribution of two dominant plants in the alpine meadow inEastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2011,31(4):451-460.
9. 石明明,牛得草,王莹,等. 围封与放牧管理对高寒草甸植物功能性状和功能多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2017,37(6):1216-1225. Shi M M,Niu D C,Wang Y,et al. Effect of fencing and grazing management on the plant functional traits and functional diversity in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2017,37(6):1216-1225.
10. 吕美强,朱志红,李英年,等. 刈割与施肥干扰下高寒草甸植物功能性状的构建模式[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(9):916-928. Lü M Q,Zhu Z H,Li Y N,et al. Assembly patterns of plant functional traits in alpine meadow under disturbances by mowing and fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2014,38(9):916-928.
11. 刘旻霞,车应弟,李俐蓉,等. 甘南高寒草甸微地形上植物叶片特征与环境因子的冗余分析[J]. 生态学杂志,2017,36(9):2473-2480. Liu M X,Che Y D,Li L R,et al. Redundancy analysis of leaf traits and environmental factors of alpine meadow in Southern Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2017,36(9):2473-2480.
12. 杨阔,黄建辉,董丹,等. 青藏高原草地植物群落冠层叶片氮磷化学计量学分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):17-22. Yang K,Huang J H,Dong D,et al. Canopy leaf N and P stoichiometry in grassland communities of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2010,34(1):17-22.
13. 张大勇,王刚,赵松岭. 甘南亚高山草甸弃耕地植物群落演替的数量研究Ⅰ. 演替先锋群落的特征分析[J]. 中国草地学报,1988(6):14-19. Zhang D Y,Wang G,Zhao S L. Quantitative study on plant community succession of alpine meadow abandoned farmland in Gannn and characteristic analysis of pioneer community of succession[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland,1988(6):14-19.
14. 阎恩荣,王希华,周武. 天童常绿阔叶林演替系列植物群落的N:P化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2008,32(1):13-22. Yan E R,Wang X H,Zhou W. N:P stoichiometry in secondary succession in evergreen broadleaved forest,Tiantong,East China[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology,2008,32(1):13-22.
15. 韦兰英,上官周平. 黄土高原不同演替阶段草地植被细根垂直分布特征与土壤环境的关系[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(11):3740-3748. Wei L Y,Shangguan Z P. Relationship between vertical distribution of fine root in different successional stages of herbaceous vegetation and soil environment in Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(11):3740-3748.
16. Bazzazfa. Plants in changing environments:linking physiological,population,and community ecology[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1996:264-280.
17. 邹厚远,程积民,周麟. 黄土高原草原植被的自然恢复演替及调节[J]. 水土保持研究,1998,5(1):126-138. Zou H Y,Cheng J M,Zhou L. Natural recoverage succession and regulation of the prairie vegetation on the Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,1998,5(1):126-138.
18. Westmanw E. Diversity relations and succession in Californian coastal sage scrub[J]. Ecology,1981,62(1):170-184.
19. Garnier E,Cortez J,Billès G,et al. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession[J]. Ecology,2004,85(9):2630-2637.
20. Chapin F S,Bloom A J,Field C B,et al. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors:Physiological ecology provides tools for studying how interacting environmental resources control plant growth[J]. Bioscience,1987,37(1):49-57.
21. 郑淑霞,上官周平. 不同功能型植物光合特性及其与叶氮含量、比叶重的关系[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(1):171-181. Zheng S X,Shangguan Z P. Photosynthetic characteristics and their relationships with leaf nitrogen contentand leaf mass per area in different plant functional types[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(1):171-181.
22. 白文娟,郑粉莉,董莉丽,等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带不同生境植物的叶性状[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(10):2529-2540. Bai W J,Zheng F L,Dong L L,et al. Leaf traits of species in different habits in the water-wind erosion region of the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(10):2529-2540.
23. Hidaka A,Kitayama K. Divergent Patterns of photosynthetic phosphorus-use efficiency versus nitrogen-use efficiency of tree leaves along nutrient-availability gradients[J]. Journal of Ecology,2009,97(5):984-991.
24. O'leary M H. Carbon Isotopes in photosynthesis:fractionation techniques may reveal new aspects of carbon dynamics in plants[J]. BioScience,1988,38(5):328-336.
25. 李庆康,马克平. 植物群落演替过程中植物生理生态学特性及其主要环境因子的变化[J]. 植物生态学报,2002,26(S1):9-19. Li Q K,Ma K P. Advances in plant succession ecophysiology[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2002,26(S1):9-19.
26. 马剑英,陈发虎,夏敦胜,等. 荒漠植物红砂(Reaumuria soongorica)叶片元素和水分含量与土壤因子的关系[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(3):983-992. Ma J Y,Chen F H,Xia D S,et al. Relationships between soil factors and leaf element,water contents in desert plant Reaumuria soongorica[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(3):983-992.
27. Sánchez-Díaz M,García J L,Antolin M C,et al. Effects of soil drought and atmospheric humidity on yield,gas exchange,and stable carbon isotope composition of barley[J]. Photosynthetica,2002,40(3):415-421.

[1]	谭永佳, 高翠芳, 陈学林. 不同海拔细叶亚菊挥发油成分的比较[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(5): 782-788.
[2]	吴金, 李承义, 李小芳, 张朝晖. 喀斯特天坑内孔雀藓科植物垂直分布特征及其与环境因子关系的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(1): 45-53.
[3]	段义忠, 杜忠毓, 亢福仁. 西北干旱区孑遗濒危植物蒙古沙冬青群落特征及与环境因子的关系[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(6): 834-842.
[4]	李泽科, 吴启美, 王智慧, 张朝晖. 岩溶城市背景下贵阳市峰丛苔藓植物多样性分布及其生态特征[J]. 植物研究, 2018, 38(3): 433-443.
[5]	韩淑婷, 田桂泉, 韩淑美. 大青沟国家自然保护区不同植被类型地面生苔藓植物物种多样性研究[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(5): 664-672.
[6]	黄文娟, 焦培培, 黄金花, 张丹. 塔里木河流域胡杨叶片解剖结构比较研究[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(5): 669-675.
[7]	朱晓凤1,2；沈慧1*；金冬梅1；赵国华1,3；刘保东3；凌铁军2；严岳鸿1. 4种蕨类植物的孢子繁殖研究[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(2): 167-176.
[8]	贺俊东;胥晓;*;郇慧慧;杨帅;秦芳;. 青杨雌雄扦插苗光合作用日变化与叶绿素荧光参数特征[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(2): 219-225.
[9]	胡变芳;谢树莲*. 用灰关联法分析环境因子对辛安泉泉溪大型藻类的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(1): 98-103.
[10]	宋国元;曹同. 上海海岸带及邻近岛屿植物分布特点和环境因子分析[J]. 植物研究, 2011, 31(6): 758-769.
[11]	胡变芳;谢树莲*. 山西省辛安泉泉域弧形串珠藻物候期的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2011, 31(1): 85-88.
[12]	杨逢建;庞海河;祖元刚*;张学科;高银祥. 南方红豆杉生长发育及其紫杉醇含量与环境因子的关系[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(6): 742-746.
[13]	石福孙;陈华峰;吴宁*. 增温对川西北亚高山高寒草甸植物群落碳、氮含量的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(6): 730-736.
[14]	宋国元;曹同;徐晟冲. 长江口冲积岛植物群落演替现状[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(1): 114-123.
[15]	宋国元;曹　同;陈　怡;柳　俊. 上海市蕨类植物分布特点及其与环境因子关系分析[J]. 植物研究, 2006, 26(1): 109-116.