水位提升和泥炭藓繁殖体移植对泥炭地植被恢复的影响

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.008

植物研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 699-706.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2019.05.008

水位提升和泥炭藓繁殖体移植对泥炭地植被恢复的影响

杨盼盼^1,2, 刘宇^1,2, 卜兆君^1,2, 马进泽³, 王升忠^1,2, 陈旭^1,2, 杨云荷^1,2

1. 东北师范大学地理科学学院, 长白山地理过程与生态安全教育部重点实验室, 长春 130024;
2. 东北师范大学泥炭沼泽研究所, 国家环境保护湿地生态与植被恢复重点实验室, 长春 130024;
3. 赣南师范大学地理与环境工程学院, 赣州 341000

收稿日期:2019-03-05 出版日期:2019-09-05 发布日期:2019-07-16
通讯作者: 卜兆君 E-mail:buzhaojun@nenu.edu.cn
作者简介:杨盼盼(1993-),女,硕士,主要研究方向为退化泥炭地生态恢复。
基金资助:
国家重点研发项目（2016YFC0500407）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（41871046，41471043）；吉林省中青年科技创新领军人才及团队基金资助项目（20190101025JH）资助

Effects of Water Table Level Increase and Sphagnum Propagule Transplantation on Vegetation Restoration

YANG Pan-Pan^1,2, LIU Yu^1,2, BU Zhao-Jun^1,2, MA Jin-Ze³, WANG Sheng-Zhong^1,2, CHEN Xu^1,2, YANG Yun-He^1,2

1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory for Wetland Conservation and Vegetation Restoration Institute for Peat and Mire Research, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
2. Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory for Wetland Ecological Processes and Environmental Change in the Changbai Mountains, Changchun 130024;
3. College of Geography and Environment Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000

Received:2019-03-05 Online:2019-09-05 Published:2019-07-16
Supported by:
National Key Research Program of China(2016YFC0500407);National Natural Science Foundation of China(41871046,41471043);The Leading Young and Middle-aged Talent and Team in Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of Jilin Province(20190101025JH)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 泥炭藓繁殖体移植是影响泥炭地植被恢复的重要因素之一，不同移植方式的效果往往缺乏比较研究。选取长白山区白江河退化泥炭地为研究地，以自然生境的丘间种喙叶泥炭藓（Sphagnum flexuosum）和藓丘种中位泥炭藓（S.magellanicum）（后者耐旱能力较强）为实验材料，通过野外移植实验，研究水位提升与不同泥炭藓繁殖体移植方式对退化泥炭地植被恢复的影响。数据分析显示：水位条件显著影响了喙叶泥炭藓和中位泥炭藓的建植，随着水位上升，地表湿度增加，两种泥炭藓的盖度均呈明显的上升趋势；移植方式的变化短期内对泥炭藓的建植作用并不明显，但在移植2个月后，移植方式对喙叶泥炭藓表现出显著影响，即耐旱能力较强的中位泥炭藓置于上层时，喙叶泥炭藓盖度最高；水位和移植方式不存在交互作用，即在低水位条件下，中位泥炭藓置于上层的移植方式也未能提升泥炭藓的建植盖度。研究表明，水位提升是泥炭地植被恢复的十分有效的手段，因物种间存在对水分保持的差异，采用合理植物繁殖体移植方式，将会明显提升植被恢复的成效。

关键词: 泥炭地, 植被恢复, 泥炭藓, 水位, 繁殖体移植

Abstract: Propagule transplantation of Sphagnum is one of the important factors affecting restoration of peatland vegetation, but the effect of transplantation modes on restoration success has lack of comparative research. The degraded peatland of Baijianghe in Changbai Mountains area was selected as the research site, and a hollow species S.flexuosum and a hummock species S.magellanicum(the latter with strong relatively drought tolerance) collected from natural habitats were chosen as experimental materials. We tried to study the effect of water table level increase and different transplant modes of Sphagnum propagule on vegetation restoration of the degraded peatland by field transplant experiment. Our data analyses showed that water table level significantly affected the establishment of S.flexuosum and S.magellanicum, and their cover increased obviously with water table level increase; transplantation mode had no effect on establishment of both Sphagnum after one month, but did have on that of S.flexusoum after two months meanwhile S.flexusoum gained greatest cover when it being transplanted first and covered by drought-tolerance species S.magellanicum; no interaction between water table level and transplantation mode was observed, namely the transplantation mode in which S.flexusoum was covered by S.magellanicum did not facilitate S.flexusoum establishment. Therefore, water table level increase is a very effective means of vegetation restoration in degraded peatlands and reasonable transplantation mode will promote restoration efficiency due to species-specific drought tolerance.

Key words: peatland, vegetation restoration, Sphagnum, water table level, propagule transplantation

中图分类号:

Q914.84

杨盼盼, 刘宇, 卜兆君, 马进泽, 王升忠, 陈旭, 杨云荷. 水位提升和泥炭藓繁殖体移植对泥炭地植被恢复的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(5): 699-706.

YANG Pan-Pan, LIU Yu, BU Zhao-Jun, MA Jin-Ze, WANG Sheng-Zhong, CHEN Xu, YANG Yun-He. Effects of Water Table Level Increase and Sphagnum Propagule Transplantation on Vegetation Restoration[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(5): 699-706.

参考文献

1. Yu Z C,Loisel J,Brosseau D P,et al. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,2010,37(13):L13402.
2. Schimel D S. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle[J]. Global Change Biology,1995,1(1):77-91.
3. Finlayson M C,D'cruz R,Davidson N,et al. Millennium ecosystem assessment:ecosystems and human well-being:wetlands and water synthesis[J]. Data Fusion Concepts & Ideas,2005,656(1):87-98.
4. Kim S Y,Freeman C,Fenner N,et al. Functional and structural responses of bacterial and methanogen communities to 3-year warming incubation in different depths of peat mire[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2012,57:23-30.
5. Joosten H. The global peatland CO₂ picture:peatland status and drainage related emissions in all countries of the world[EB/OL]. Wageningen:Wetlands International,2009[2010-08]http://www.wetlands.htm.
6. Rochefort L,Andersen R. Global peatland restoration after 30 years:where are we in this mossy world?[J]. Restoration Ecology,2017,25(2):269-270.
7. Paavilainen E,Paivanen J. Peatland forestry:ecology and principles[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag,1995.
8. Laiho R,Sallantaus T,Laine J. The effect of forestry drainage on vertical distributions of major plant nutrients in peat soils[J]. Plant and Soil,1999,207(2):169-181.
9. Sundstr m E,Magnusson T,Hånell B. Nutrient conditions in drained peatlands along a north-south climatic gradient in Sweden[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2000,126(2):149-161.
10. Borkenhagen A,Cooper D J. Creating fen initiation conditions:a new approach for peatland reclamation in the oil sands region of Alberta[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2016,53(2):550-558.
11. Van Dijk J,Stroetenga M,Van Bodegom P M,et al. The contribution of rewetting to vegetation restoration of degraded peat meadows[J]. Applied Vegetation Science,2007,10(3):315-324.
12. Cobbaert D,Rochefort L,Price J S. Experimental restoration of a fen plant community after peat mining[J]. Applied Vegetation Science,2004,7(2):209-220.
13. Van Breemen N. How Sphagnum bogs down other plants[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,1995,10(7):270-275.
14. 周进,Tachibana H,李伟,等. 受损湿地植被的恢复与重建研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报,2001,25(5):561-572. Zhou J,Tachibana H,Li W,et al. An overview of studies on the restoration and reconstruction of disturbed wetland vegetation communities[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,2001,25(5):561-572.
15. 卜兆君,王升忠,谢宗航. 泥炭沼泽学若干基本概念的再认识[J]. 东北师大学报:自然科学版,2005,37(2):105-110. Bu Z J,Wang S Z,Xie Z H. Re-understanding some elementary concepts in mire science[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2005,37(2):105-110.
16. 陈旭,卜兆君,王升忠,等. 长白山哈泥泥炭地七种苔藓植物生态位[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(3):574-578. Chen X,Bu Z J,Wang S Z,et al. Niches of seven bryophyte species in Hani peat land of Changbai Mountains[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(3):574-578.
17. 韩明浩,刘赢男,周丹,等. 农业活动对三江平原湿地主要植物种群生态位的影响[J]. 植物研究,2017,37(3):461-467. Han M H,Liu Y N,Zhou D,et al. Effects of agricultural activities on niche of main wetland plant populations in Sanjiang Plain[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,2017,37(3):461-467.
18. Rydin H,Jeglum J K. The biology of peatlands[M]. 2nd ed. Oxford:Oxford University Press,2013.
19. Bu Z J,Zheng X X,Rydin H,et al. Facilitation vs. competition:does interspecific interaction affect drought responses in Sphagnum?[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology,2013,14(7):574-584.
20. Campeau S,Rochefort L. Sphagnum regeneration on bare peat surfaces:field and greenhouse experiments[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(3):599-608.
21. 金树仁,郎惠卿. 长白山地沼泽草地类型及其利用途径[J]. 东北师大学报:自然科学版,1988,20(3):141-145. Jin S R,Lang H Q. The types and using prospects for mire grassland in Changbai Mountains[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University:Natural Science Edition,1988,20(3):141-145.
22. 赵魁义. 中国沼泽志[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1999. Zhao K Y. Chinese marsh[M]. Beijing:Science Press,1999.
23. 孙守琴,王根绪,罗辑,等. 苔藓植物对环境变化的响应和适应性[J]. 西北植物学报,2009,29(11):2360-2365. Sun S Q,Wang G X,Luo J,et al. Response and adaption of bryophytes to the changes of environmental factors[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica,2009,29(11):2360-2365.
24. Andrus R E. Some aspects of Sphagnum ecology[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1986,64(2):416-426.
25. Rochefort L. Sphagnum-a keystone genus in habitat restoration[J]. The Bryologist,2000,103(3):503-508.
26. 张云霞,李晓兵,陈云浩. 草地植被盖度的多尺度遥感与实地测量方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展,2003,18(1):85-93. Zhang Y X,Li X B,Chen Y H. Overview of field and multi-scale remote sensing measurement approaches to grassland vegetation coverage[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences,2003,18(1):85-93.
27. Mulligan R C,Gignac L D. Bryophyte community structure in a boreal poor fen:reciprocal transplants[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,2002,80(4):330-339.
28. Bragazza L. Sphagnum niche diversification in two oligotrophic mires in the Southern Alps of Italy[J]. The Bryologist,1997,100(4):507-515.
29. Gorham E,Rochefort L. Peatland restoration:a brief assessment with special reference to Sphagnum bogs[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2003,11(1-2):109-119.
30. Grosvernier P,Matthey Y,Buttler A. Growth potential of three Sphagnum species in relation to water table level and peat properties with implications for their restoration in cut-over bogs[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1997,34(2):471-483.
31. Silvola J,Aaltonen H. Water content and photosynthesis in the peat mosses Sphagnum fuscum and S. angustifolium[J]. Annales Botanici Fennici,1984,21(1):1-6.
32. Lindholm T,Vasander H. Production of eight species of Sphagnum at Suurisuo mire,southern Finland[J]. Annales Botanici Fennici,1990,27(2):145-157.
33. Rochefort L,Campeau S,Bugnon J L. Does prolonged flooding prevent or enhance regeneration and growth of Sphagnum?[J]. Aquatic Botany,2002,74(4):327-341.

[1]	邹书珍, 尹才佳, 杨茜, 马龙, 康迪. 子午岭次生油松林立木竞争格局研究[J]. 植物研究, 2023, 43(1): 140-149.
[2]	石匡正, 张朝晖, 何春梅, 王智慧. 毕节吞天井边缘地带不同郁闭度环境对泥炭藓叶绿素荧光特性及蓄水量的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2021, 41(2): 262-269.
[3]	谷晓楠, 卜兆君, 葛佳丽, 刘莎莎, 蒋涛, 卢孟, 郭震宇, 丁继昭. 潜水位和邻体对长白山哈泥泥炭地3种苔藓的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(5): 683-691.
[4]	薛鸥；魏天兴*. 鹫峰国家森林公园低效人工林林下植物种间关联[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(1): 34-42.
[5]	严慧玲1,2；刘东明2*；李作恒2；陈红锋2；王丙兴3；赵文忠2；王俊2. 层次分析法在河北省太行山区植被恢复植物种类筛选中的运用[J]. 植物研究, 2015, 35(5): 751-758.
[6]	冯璐;汤袁;卜兆君*;赵高林;. 长白山哈泥泥炭地持久孢子库的实验证据[J]. 植物研究, 2013, 33(2): 248-251.
[7]	孙明学;贾炜玮*. 塔河林业局林火对植被的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(4): 481-487.

水位提升和泥炭藓繁殖体移植对泥炭地植被恢复的影响

Effects of Water Table Level Increase and Sphagnum Propagule Transplantation on Vegetation Restoration

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价