呼和浩特市古榆树心腐特征及其影响因素

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2025.02.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究呼和浩特市古榆树心腐特征及其影响因素，并提出古榆树保护策略，为古榆树保护工作提供理论依据。利用Picus3应力波树干横断面扫描仪和TRU树木雷达检测系统对呼和浩特市44株古榆树样本的心腐特征进行普查，采用线性回归模型分析古榆树心腐与健康指标、形态指标和环境指标的关系，探究古榆树心腐的相关影响因素。结果表明：呼和浩特市古榆树心腐等级数量占比从大到小依次为Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅰ级、Ⅳ级，树干心腐始点出现的频率从高到低依次为髓心（S，36次）、树干边材（B，25次）、树干中部（Z，14次）。根系密度在垂直和水平方向上的分布规律一致，均表现为离主干越近根系密度越大。影响因素中主干病害（R²=0.302）、主干虫害（R²=0.234）、树皮损伤（R²=0.225）、土壤紧实度（R²=0.248）与心腐指数关系极显著（P<0.01）；根系生长空间（R²=0.187）、树冠生长空间（R²=0.103）、根系密度（R²=0.121）与心腐指数关系显著（P<0.05）；而主干倾斜（R²=0.011）、冠形（R²=0.013）与心腐指数无显著关系（P>0.05）。呼和浩特市古榆树心腐初期主要发生在树干的髓心和边材区域，病因是树干边材受到损伤，但髓心出现的心腐危害更严重。古榆树树干健康随树木生长逐渐衰退，且当树干出现腐烂或空洞时，树干衰退速度加快。古榆树心腐与健康指标、环境指标有显著相关性，与古树自身形态指标无显著相关性，根系密度也是影响古榆树心腐的重要因素。因此，及时评估古榆树健康状态，及时人为干预治疗修复，加大力度保护树体免受损伤，加强树干内部损伤检测，在可实现范围内应合理规划古榆树生长所需的物理空间，并及时松土保证其有充足的生长空间和养分补给，注意病虫害防治和树皮损伤修复，减少外界环境侵害，提高古榆树养护成效。

关键词: 呼和浩特市, 古榆树, 心腐特征, 根系分布, Picus3应力波检测

Abstract:

The characteristics and influencing factors of heart rot in ancient elm trees in Hohhot were studied， and protection strategies for ancient elm trees were proposed to provide a theoretical basis for their conservation. In this study， Picus³ stress wave trunk cross-sectional scanner and TRU tree radar detection system were used to determine the heart rot characteristics of 44 ancient elm samples in Hohhot by 1∶1 stratified random sampling method. Linear regression model was used to analyze the relationship between heart rot of ancient elm trees and health indicators， morphological indicators and environmental indicators， and to explore the related factors influencing heart rot of ancient elm trees. The results showed that the quantity proportion of heart rot grades of ancient elm trees in Hohhot was ranked from large to small as grade Ⅱ>Ⅲ>Ⅰ>Ⅳ， and the frequency of the beginning point of trunk heart rot was ranked from high to low as pith（S， 36 times）>trunk sapwood（B， 25 times）>middle trunk（Z， 14 times）. The distribution of root density in the vertical and horizontal directions was consistent， indicating that the closer to the trunk， the greater the root density. Among the influencing factors， trunk diseases（R²=0.302）， trunk pests（R²=0.234）， bark damage（R²=0.225）， soil compaction（R²=0.248） and heart rot index were significantly correlated（P<0.01）. Root growth space（R²=0.187）， crown growth space（R²=0.103） and root density（R²=0.121） were significantly correlated with heart rot index（P<0.05）. There was no significant correlation between trunk inclination（R²=0.011）， crown shape（R²=0.013） and heart rot index（P>0.05）. The heart rot of ancient elm trees in Hohhot initially occurred mainly in the pith and sapwood areas of the trunk， the heart rot was mainly caused by damage to the sapwood of the trunk in the early stage of heart rot， but the heart rot in the pith was more serious. The trunk health of the ancient elm trees gradually declined with the growth of the trees， and the decline rate accelerated when the trunk appeared rot or cavities. The heart rot of ancient elm trees had a significant correlation with health indicators and environmental indicators， but not with the morphological indicators of ancient trees. Root density was also an important factor affecting the heart rot of ancient trees. Therefore， the health status of ancient elm trees should be assessed in time， and intervention treatment and repair should be done timely， the tree body should be protected from damage， and internal damage detection in the trunk should be strengthened， the physical space required for the growth of ancient trees should be reasonably planned， and the soil should be loosened in time to ensure its sufficient growth space and nutrient supply， attention should be paid to the prevention and control of diseases and insect pests and the repair of bark damage of ancient elm trees， the occurrence of external environmental violations should be reduced， and the conservation effect of ancient trees should be improved.

Key words: Hohhot, ancient elm, heart rot characteristics, root distribution, Picus³ stress wave detection

中图分类号:

Q944.3

孙耀文, 南海风, 王晓敏, 左郎, 南若晗. 呼和浩特市古榆树心腐特征及其影响因素[J]. 植物研究, 2025, 45(2): 266-276.

Yaowen SUN, Haifeng NAN, Xiaomin WANG, Lang ZUO, Ruohan NAN. Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Heart Rot in Ancient Elm Trees in Hohhot[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2025, 45(2): 266-276.

图/表 11

图1

图2

表1

呼和浩特市古榆树调查指标标准

指标类型

Indicator type

调查指标

Survey indicator

测量标准

Measurement standard

健康指标

Health indicators

树皮损伤

Bark damage

树干无损伤记为5；0~1/6树干周长损伤记为4；1/6~1/3树干周长损伤记为3；1/3~1/2树干周长损伤记为2；>1/2树干周长损伤记为1

No trunk damage was recorded as 5； 0-1/6 trunk circumference damage（TCD） was recorded as 4；1/6-1/3 TCD was recorded as 3；1/3-1/2 TCD was recorded as 2；>1/2 TCD was recorded as 1

主干病害

Trunk disease

心腐检测处上下20 cm范围内，树干受害面积>75%记为1；树干受害>50%且≤75%记为2；树干受害>25%且≤50%记为3；树干受害>5%且≤25%记为4；树干受害≤5%记为5

Within 20 cm above and below the heart rot detection， trunk damage area（TDA）>75% was recorded as 1；TDA>50% and ≤75% was recorded as 2；TDA >25% and ≤50% was recorded as 3；TDA >5% and ≤25% was recorded as 4；TDA≤5% was recorded as 5

主干虫害

Trunk pest

心腐检测处上下20 cm范围内，树干受害面积>75%记为1；树干受害>50%且≤75%记为2；树干受害>25%且≤50%记为3；树干受害>5%且≤25%记为4；树干受害≤5%记为5

Within 20 cm above and below the heart rot detection， trunk damage area（TDA）>75% was recorded as 1；TDA >50% and ≤75% was recorded as 2；TDA >25% and ≤50% was recorded as 3；TDA >5% and ≤25% was recorded as 4；TDA ≤5% was recorded as 5

形态指标

Morphological indicators

主干倾斜角

Trunk tilt angle

以林木树干主体与水平地面的夹角为准。树干倾斜角>30°记为1；树干倾斜角20°~30°记为2；树干倾斜角10°~20°记为3；树干倾斜角5°~10°记为4；树干倾斜角0°~5°记为5

The angle between the main body of the tree trunk and the horizontal ground was used. The trunk tilt angle （TTA）>30° was recorded as 1；TTA in 20°-30° was recorded as 2；TTA in 10°-20° was recorded as 3；TTA in 5°-10° was recorded as 4； TTA in 0°-5° was recorded as 5

冠形

Crown shape

树冠不规则，树枝极为不均匀记为1；树冠缺失严重，枝叶分布凌乱记为2；树冠一定程度缺失，形状不规则记为3；树冠少许缺失，较为规则记为4；树冠均匀对称，冠形优美记为5

The crown was irregular and the branches were unevenly distributed，which was recorded as 1；the crown was seriously missing and the distribution of branches and leaves was messy，which was recorded as 2；the crown was missing to some extent and the shape was irregular，which was recorded as 3；the crown was missing a little and was more regular，which was recorded as 4；the crown was even and symmetrical and the crown was beautifully shaped，which was recorded as 5

环境指标

Environmental indicators

根系生长空间

Root growth space

古树周围5 m以上无建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为5；古树周围4~5 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为4；古树周围3~4 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为3；古树周围2~3 m有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为2；古树周围2 m之内有建筑物、水泥及其他硬化阻碍记为1

The case without buildings，cement and rocks around the tree for more than 5 m was recorded as 5；the case with buildings，cement and other hardened obstacles around the tree for 4-5 m was recorded as 4； for 3-4 m was recorded as 3；for 2-3 m was recorded as 2；the case with buildings，cement，and other hardened obstacles within 2 m around the tree was recorded as 1

树冠生长空间

Canopy growth space

古树正常生长空间无限制记为5；能满足80%以上的生长空间记为4；能满足60%~80%的生长空间记为3；能满足30%~60%生长空间记为2；只能满足30%以下的生长空间记为1

The normal growth space of ancient trees without restriction was recorded as 5；that can meet more than 80% of the growth space was recorded as 4； that can meet 60%-80% was recorded as 3；that can meet 30%-60% was recorded as 2；that can only meet less than 30% was recorded as 1

土壤紧实度

Soil compaction

土壤疏松，稍加压力很容易使土块碎散记为5；较疏松，稍加压力便可将刀插入2~3 cm记为4；坚实，不用很大力可把刀插入土体2~3 cm记为3；较坚实，用很大力可把刀插入土体2~3 cm记为2；坚硬，用很大力也难把刀插入土体记为1

Soil was loose，which a little pressure was easy to make the soil fragmentation was recorded as 5；looser，which a little pressure could be inserted into the knife 2-3 cm was recorded as 4；solid，that without very strong was recorded as 3；more solid，that with very strong was recorded as 2；hard，that with very strong also difficult to insert the knife into the soil was recorded as 1

表1

图3

图4

图5

表2

表3

图6

表4

表5

参考文献 29

1	ÇOLAK A H， KIRCA S， ROTHERHAM I D.Ancient woods，trees and forests：ecology，history and management［M］.London：Pelagic Publishing Ltd，2023：5-6.
2	续九如，宋婉，邹受益，等.榆属树种遗传改良研究现状及思考［J］.北京林业大学学报，2000，22（6）：95-99.
	XU J R， SONG W， ZOU S Y，et al.Research status and some consideration in genetic improvement of elm species［J］.Journal of Beijing Forestry University，2000，22（6）：95-99.
3	杨霞，李钢铁，王永胜，等.浑善达克沙地桑根达来古榆树调查研究［J］.内蒙古农业大学学报（自然科学版），2011，32（4）：172-178.
	YANG X， LI G T， WANG Y S，et al.The ancient elm investigation of Sanggendalai of Hunshandake sandy land［J］.Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University （Natural Science Edition），2011，32（4）：172-178.
4	孟瑞芳，乌兰娜，赵一凡，等.呼和浩特市古树资源现状分析［J］.内蒙古林业调查设计，2021，44（6）：20-24.
	MENG R F， WU L N， ZHAO Y F，et al.Analysis on the present situation of ancient tree resources in Hohhot［J］.Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design，2021，44（6）：20-24.
5	SUNDARARAJ R， SWETHA P， MONDAL S，et al.Incidence and effect of heart rot in Marayur sandalwood （Santalum album L.） reserve，Kerala，and its natural durability against fungi［J］.Forest Science，2023，69（2）：133-142.
6	ARHIPOVA N， GAITNIEKS T， DONIS J，et al.Heart-rot and associated fungi in Alnus glutinosa stands in Latvia［J］.Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research，2012，27（4）：327-336.
7	SCORTICHINI M， BELISARIO A， MOTTA E.Bacterial species in relation to forest tree decline［J］.Journal of Arboriculture，1991，17（9）：246-249.
8	PARKER E， LEWINGTON A.Ancient trees：trees that live for a thousand years［M］.London：Batsford Books，2012：21-27.
9	ZAPPONI L， MAZZA G， FARINA A，et al.The role of monumental trees for the preservation of saproxylic biodiversity：re-thinking their management in cultural landscapes［J］.Nature Conservation，2017，19：231-243.
10	刘瑜，徐程扬.古树健康评价研究进展［J］.世界林业研究，2013，26（1）：37-42.
	LIU Y， XU C Y.Research progress in ancient trees health assessment［J］.World Forestry Research，2013， 26（1）：37-42.
11	BAXTER D V.The biology and pathology of some of the hardwood heart-rotting fungi：Part I［J］.American Journal of Botany，1925，12（8）：522-552.
12	SUDIN M， LEE S S， HARUN A H.A survey of heart rot in some plantations of Acacia mangium in Sabah［J］.Journal of Tropical Forest Science，1993，6（1）：37-47.
13	呼和浩特市古树名木保护条例［EB/OL］.（2022-07-07）［2024-09-30］..
	Regulations on protection of ancient and famous trees in Hohhot［EB/OL］.（2022-07-07）［2024-09-30］..
14	王毅明，韩文泉.PiCUS³在南京市梧桐树干空洞探测中的应用［J］.城市勘测，2015（1）：119-122.
	WANG Y M， HAN W Q.Application on detecting the caves in the trunk of phoenix tree with PiCUS³ in Nanjing［J］.Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying，2015（1）：119-122.
15	袁岸.基于TRU树木雷达的悬铃木空腐率规律与根系分布特征探究［D］.杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2022.
	YUAN A.Research on the law of empty rot rate and root distribution characteristics of Platanus acerifolia based on TRU tree radar［D］.Yangling：Northwest A&F University，2022.
16	刘星旦，康永祥，甘明旭，等.黄帝陵古侧柏树干心腐研究［J］.西北林学院学报，2017，32（2）：180-187.
	LIU X D， KANG Y X， GAN M X，et al.A study on trunk decay of ancient Platycladus orientalis in tomb of Yellow Emperor［J］.Journal of Northwest Forestry University，2017，32（2）：180-187.
17	刘俊雁，郑征，牛燕芬，等.西双版纳热带森林空心树形成概率及其影响因素［J］.生态学杂志，2016，35（10）：2621-2626.
	LIU J Y， ZHENG Z， NIU Y F，et al.Likelihood and influencing factors of tree cavities in tropical forest in Xishuangbanna，Southwest China［J］.Chinese Journal of Ecology，2016，35（10）：2621-2626.
18	ADKINS M F.A burning issue：using fire to accelerate tree hollow formation in Eucalyptus species［J］.Australian Forestry，2006，69（2）：107-113.
19	ATKINSON P R， NIXON K M， SHAW M J P.On the susceptibility of Eucalyptus species and clones to attack by Macrotermes natalensis Haviland （Isoptera：Termitidae）［J］.Forest Ecology and Management，1992，48（1/2）：15-30.
20	范丽华，张永红，李金桐，等.脐腹小蠹成虫触角结构与感受器扫描电镜观察［J］.林业科学，2011，47（5）：87-89.
	FAN L H， ZHANG Y H， LI J T，et al.Antennae structure of Scolytus schevyrewi observed with a scanning electron microscope［J］.Scientia Silvae Sinicae，2011，47（5）：87-89.
21	徐勇，徐清华，姜雯，等.22%噻虫·高氯氟微囊悬浮-悬浮剂防治星天牛药效试验［J］.农药，2023，62（6）：458-460.
	XU Y， XU Q H， JIANG W，et al.Efficacy test of thiamethoxam·lambda-cyhalothrin 22% ZC for the control of Anoplophora chinensis ［J］.Agrochemicals，2023，62（6）：458-460.
22	MOHAN V， SUNDARARAJ R， PACHU A V.Wounding of trees：the precursor of wood decay［M］//SUNDARARAJ R.Science of wood degradation and its protection.Singapore：Springer，2022：87-113.
23	PENTON C E， WOOLLEY L A， RADFORD I J，et al.Blocked-off：termitaria cause the overestimation of tree hollow availability by ground-based surveys in northern Australia［J］.Forest Ecology and Management，2020，458：117707.
24	KUMAR N P， ARYA A.A new heart rot disease in Ailanthus excelsa Roxb.caused by Navisporus floccosus （Bres.） Ryvarden［J］.International Letters of Natural Sciences，2014，6：1-7.
25	刘晚苟，山仑，邓西平.植物对土壤紧实度的反应［J］.植物生理学通讯，2001，37（3）：254-260.
	LIU W G， SHAN L， DENG X P.Responses of plant to soil compaction［J］.Plant Physiology Communications，2001，37（3）：254-260.
26	张承林，徐文彬.根域容积对盆栽杨桃生长发育的影响（简报）［J］.热带作物学报，2005，26（3）：20-23.
	ZHANG C L， XU W B.Effects of root volume on the growth and development of potted Carambola （brief reports）［J］.Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops，2005，26（3）：20-23.
27	甘明旭.树木雷达（TRU）在黄帝陵古侧柏树干空腐和粗根分布检测中的应用［D］.杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2016.
	GAN M X.Tree radar unit （TRU） technology detected hollow trunk and thick root distribbution on the ancient and famous trees of Platycladus orientalis in the tomb of Yellow Emperor［D］.Yangling：Northwest A&F University，2016.
28	王嘉楠，夏媛倩，赵德先，等.城市森林主要树种树冠尺度及生长空间需求［J］.北京林业大学学报，2018，40（3）：42-54.
	WANG J N， XIA Y Q， ZHAO D X，et al.Crown scale and growth space demands of main tree species in urban forest［J］.Journal of Beijing Forestry University，2018， 40（3）：42-54.
29	李俞鑫，李莲芳，合金鑫，等.目标树生长空间释放对云南松生长及其器官和土壤养分的影响［J］.东北林业大学学报，2022，50（4）：32-39.
	LI Y X， LI L F， HE J X，et al.Effects of spatial release of objective trees on growth involved nutrients of Pinus yunnanensis and soil［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2022，50（4）：32-39.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	1	0	0	13

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	14	0
比例	100%	0%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	45

	来源	本网站

	次数	45
	比例	100%

心腐等级 Heart rot level	阈值 Threshold	样本数量 Sample number
Ⅰ级 Level Ⅰ	A<0.04	5
Ⅱ级 Level Ⅱ	0.04≤A<0.07	23
Ⅲ级 Level Ⅲ	0.07≤A<0.31	13
Ⅳ级 Level Ⅳ	A≥0.31	3

心腐等级 Heart rot level	髓心频次 S frequency	中部频次 Z frequency	边材频次 B frequency	株数 Trees count
总计 Total	36	14	25	44
Ⅰ级 Level Ⅰ	1	0	3	5
Ⅱ级 Level Ⅱ	8	1	13	23
Ⅲ级 Level Ⅲ	17	6	5	13
Ⅳ级 Level Ⅳ	10	7	4	3

[1]	孙耀文, 马迎梅, 任晓敏, 韩峰, 陈鑫, 左朗. 河套平原沙漠区3种乡土树种人工栽培后的生态适应性[J]. 植物研究, 2024, 44(4): 612-624.
[2]	戴锡玲;曹建国;李新国;王全喜. 华中铁角蕨孢子纹饰形成的超微结构观察[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(2): 159-163.
[3]	郭严冬;曹建国*;李新国;王全喜. 海金沙配子体发育及卵发生的显微观察[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(2): 164-169.
[4]	陈学林;杨建美;王文敏. 青藏高原东缘常见40种禾本科植物种子大小变异研究[J]. 植物研究, 2011, 31(1): 9-14.
[5]	王思维;郑桂灵;付英;王丹;李鹏;*. 气生凤梨叶片结构研究[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(2): 140-145.
[6]	黎有有;唐源江;李菁;周毅;黄衡宇*. 蛇足石杉的形态学及不同光照处理下气孔特征的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(4): 411-416.