欢迎访问《植物研究》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

植物研究 ›› 2006, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 176-181.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.02.009

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

山西绵山植被优势种群生态位研究

张桂萍1,2;张 峰1,3*;茹文明1,2   

  1. 1.山西大学黄土高原研究所,太原 030006 2.长治学院生化系,长治 046011 3.山西大学生命科学与技术学院,太原 030006
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-03-20 发布日期:2006-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 张 峰
  • 基金资助:
     

Niche characteristics of dominant populations of vegetation in Mian Mountain, Shanxi

ZHANG Gui-Ping;ZHANG Feng;*;RU Wen-Ming;   

  1. 1.Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006 2.Department of Biology & Chemistry, Changzhi College, Changzhi 046011 3.School of Life Science and Technology, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 03000
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-03-20 Published:2006-03-20
  • Contact: ZHANG Feng
  • Supported by:
     

摘要: 应用Shannon-Weaver指数和Portraitis方法,研究了山西绵山植被优势种群的生态位宽度、生态位普遍重叠和特定重叠,结果表明:(1)乔木层中辽东栎生态位宽度最大(2.458 7);灌木层中山桃(2.342 2)和土庄绣线菊(2.306 1)生态位宽度最大;草本层中披针苔草(2.518 7)和山蒿(2.218 2)生态位宽度最大。这主要由于这些物种的生态幅较宽,是绵山植被的主要建群种或优势种,对环境具有广泛的适应性;(2)群落中25个优势种群之间并不存在完全的普遍重叠,说明这些植物各自具有不尽相同的生物学特性及生态适应性;(3)乔木层物种除辽东栎与其它植物间具有一定的重叠之外,其它乔木间生态位重叠较少;灌木层中六道木与土庄绣线菊生态位重叠值最大(0.663),其次是山桃和胡枝子(0.587);草本植物中披针苔草与糙苏(0.339)、铁杆蒿与山蒿(0.245)表现出较大的特定重叠。种对间生态位重叠值越大,表明它们彼此间具有较为相似的生物学特性和生态适应性,反之亦然。如六道木与土庄绣线菊、披针苔草与糙苏,它们均为耐荫植物,具有一定程度的耐荫性;而山桃和胡枝子、山蒿与铁杆蒿则为喜阳耐旱植物。

关键词: 绵山, 优势种群, 生态位宽度, 生态位普遍重叠, 生态位特定重叠

Abstract: Mian Mountain is located in the northern of Taiyue Ranges and the middle south of Shanxi, at 36°50′N,112°5′E. In this paper, the niche breadth and niche overlapping of 25 dominant populations of vegetation in Mian Mountain, Shanxi, were studied by using Shannon-Weaver index and Portraits’s method. The result indicated that the niche breadth of Quercus liaotungensis (2.458 7), Prunus davidiana (2.342 2), Spiraea, pubescens (2.306 1), Carex lanceolata (2.518 7) and Artemisia brachyloba (2.218 2) were more than that of other species because these species had wide ecological amplitude, and extensive adaptation to environment, which were constructive or dominant species in the communities. There was not completely general overlapping among all 25 species because of their different biological characters and different adaptation to environment. In the arborous layer, there was less niche overlapping between species-pairs except Q. liaotungensis. The niche overlapping between Abelia biflora and S. pubescens (0.663), P. davidiana and Lespedeza bicolor (0.587) were more than that of other species-pairs in the shrub layer. The niche overlapping between C. lanceolata and Phlomis umbrosa (0.339), A. gmelinii and A. brachyloba (0.245) were more than that of the other species-pairs in the herb layer. The species-pairs having more niche overlapping had similar biological characters and similar adaptation to environment; on the contrary, those having less niche overlapping had different biological traits and different adaptation to environment. For example, A. biflora and S. pubescens, C. lanceolata and Phlomis umbrosa were shade-tolerant plants and had some shade tolerance, otherwise P. davidiana and L. bicolor, A. gmelinii and A. brachyloba were sun plants.

Key words: Mian Mountain, dominant population, niche breadth, general overlapping, specific overlapping

中图分类号: