Bulletin of Botanical Research ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 910-920.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.05.022
• Physiology and Ecology • Previous Articles
Yuhang SU1,2, Xiaoqian SONG1,2, Jingwen ZHENG1,2, Zhonghua ZHANG1,2(), Zhonghua TANG1,2
Received:
2022-02-15
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2022-09-15
Contact:
Zhonghua ZHANG
E-mail:en_cn@126.com
About author:
SU Yuhang(1997—),female,master degree student,mainly engaged in research on salt-tolerant plants.
Supported by:
CLC Number:
Yuhang SU, Xiaoqian SONG, Jingwen ZHENG, Zhonghua ZHANG, Zhonghua TANG. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of C, N and P and Their Relationship with Soil Factors from Different Organs of the Halophytic Chenopodiaceae Plants in Hulunbuir[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(5): 910-920.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://bbr.nefu.edu.cn/EN/10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.05.022
Table 1
Morphological characteristics of Chenopodiaceae plants
种类 Variety | 属 Genus | 形态特征 Morphological characteristics |
---|---|---|
碱蓬 Suaedaglauca | 碱蓬属 Suaeda | 茎直立,浅绿色,叶丝状条形,半圆柱状,灰绿色,光滑无毛。花着生于叶的近基部,花被呈五角星状,花药宽卵形至矩圆形 Stem erect,light green,filamentous linear,semi-cylindrical,gray-green,smooth and hairless. Flowers mostly inserted near base of leaves.Pentagram-shaped perianth,anthers obovate to oblong. |
尖头叶藜 Chenopodium acuminatum | 藜属 Chenopodium | 叶片呈卵状或披针形,上面无粉,浅绿色,下面有粉,灰白色,全缘并具半透明环边 Leaf ovate or lanceolate,adaxially light green and not farinose,abaxially gray-white farinose,leaf entire with translucent ring |
刺沙蓬 Salsola tragus | 猪毛菜属 Salsola | 叶顶端有刺状尖,小苞片卵形,花被长卵形,自背面中部生翅,在翅以上部分近革质,顶端薄膜质,向中央聚集,包覆果实 Leaf apex spinose mucronate, bractlet ovate, perianth narrowly ovate, Wing grow from the middle of the back, the part above the wing are subleathery, apex membranous, gather in the center and enclosing utricle |
雾冰藜 Bassia dasyphylla | 雾冰藜属 Bassia | 叶互生,肉质,圆柱状或半圆柱状条形,密被长柔毛 Leaves alternate,fleshy,terete or semiterete linear,densely villous |
Table 2
Longitude and latitude of Chenopodiaceae plant sampling site
种类 Variety | 采样点经纬度 Longitude and latitude of sampling point |
---|---|
碱蓬 S.glauca | 117°15′21.43″E,48°27′50.29″N 116°51′40.83″E,48°49′12.7″N |
尖头叶藜 C. acuminatum | 116°51′40.83″E,48°49′12.7″N 117°15′21.43″E,48°27′50.29″N |
刺沙蓬 S. tragus | 117°52′11.22″E,48°20′55.06″N 116°51′40.83″E,48°20′55.06″N |
雾冰藜 B. dasyphylla | 117°15′21.43″E,48°27′50.29″N |
Table 3
Comparison of measurement characteristics of C,N,P in roots,stems and leaves of Chenopodiaceae plants
器官 Organ | 样本量 Number of samples | C | N | P | C/N | C/P | N/P | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
测量值 Value | CV | 测量值 Value | CV | 测量值 Value | CV | 测量值 Value | CV | 测量值 Value | CV | 测量值 Value | CV | ||
叶Leaf | 24 | 301.81±42.91c | 0.14 | 19.68±1.35a | 0.06 | 1.00±0.38a | 0.37 | 15.39±2.38c | 0.15 | 334.04±103.99b | 0.31 | 21.79±6.11a | 0.28 |
茎Stem | 24 | 337.97±36.98b | 0.11 | 14.54±1.63b | 0.11 | 0.95±0.28a | 0.29 | 23.58±4.02b | 0.17 | 377.61±84.44b | 0.22 | 16.32±4.07b | 0.25 |
根Root | 24 | 421.36±52.05a | 0.12 | 10.57±1.73c | 0.16 | 0.94±0.29a | 0.30 | 41.69±12.23a | 0.29 | 485.88±151.64a | 0.31 | 12.59±5.65c | 0.45 |
Table 4
The relationship between the content of C,N,P in the roots,stems and leaves of Chenopodiaceae plants and their measurement ratios
器官 Organ | 叶Leaf | 茎Stem | 根Root | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | N | P | C | N | P | C | N | P | ||
叶Leaf | C | 1.000 | ||||||||
N | 0.155 | 1.000 | ||||||||
P | 0.195 | 0.484** | 1.000 | |||||||
茎Stem | C | 0.956** | 0.181 | 0.250 | 1.000 | |||||
N | 0.019 | 0.303 | 0.286 | -0.067 | 1.000 | |||||
P | 0.241 | 0.566** | 0.282 | 0.272 | 0.297 | 1.000 | ||||
根Root | C | 0.656* | -0.176 | 0.159 | 0.665* | -0.099 | -0.092 | 1.000 | ||
N | -0.291 | 0.667** | 0.263 | -0.181 | 0.209 | 0.598** | -0.566** | 1.000 | ||
P | 0.003 | -0.494* | -0.496* | -0.018 | -0.489 | -0.405* | 0.041 | -0.427* | 1.000 | |
叶Leaf | C/N | 0.895** | -0.303 | -0.014 | 0.883** | -0.137 | -0.018 | 0.736** | -0.593* | 0.184 |
C/P | 0.324 | -0.304 | -0.835** | 0.303 | -0.255 | -0.176 | 0.066 | -0.333 | 0.458 | |
N/P | -0.198 | -0.193 | -0.933** | -0.217 | -0.157 | -0.224 | -0.353 | -0.052 | 0.426 | |
茎Stem | C/N | 0.628* | -0.069 | -0.065 | 0.713** | -0.739** | 0.003 | 0.492* | -0.251 | 0.345 |
C/P | 0.239 | -0.521* | -0.123 | 0.238 | -0.158 | -0.824** | 0.502* | -0.718** | 0.295 | |
N/P | -0.257 | -0.447* | -0.145 | -0.326 | -0.299 | -0803** | 0.073 | -0.510* | 0.112 | |
根Root | C/N | 0.481 | -0.520** | -0.035 | 0.408* | -0.052 | -0.399 | 0.818** | -0.915** | 0.230 |
C/P | 0.314 | 0.576** | 0.605** | 0.355 | 0.420 | 0.584** | 0.249 | 0.354 | -0.859** | |
N/P | -0.013 | 0.724** | 0.521** | 0.056 | 0.432 | 0.724** | -0.255 | 0.768** | -0.810** |
Table 6
Relationship between ecological stoichiometry of Chenopodiaceae plants roots,stems and leaves and soil factors
器官 Organ | 土壤因子 Soil factors | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH | Ece | C (g·kg-1) | N (g·kg-1) | P (g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P | K (g·kg-1) | Na (g·kg-1) | ||
C | 叶Leaf | 0.381 | 0.182 | -0.309 | -0.551 | 0.357 | 0.534 | -0.809** | -0.844** | -0.547 | -0.133 |
茎Stem | 0.420 | 0.117 | -0.296 | -0.488 | 0.359 | 0.458 | -0.798** | -0.823** | -0.485 | -0.163 | |
根Root | 0.206 | 0.666* | -0.384 | -0.609* | 0.234 | 0.563 | -0.687* | -0.703* | -0.192 | 0.178 | |
N | 叶Leaf | -0.019 | 0.149 | 0.116 | 0.227 | 0.462 | -0.295 | -0.243 | -0.210 | -0.098 | 0.022 |
茎Stem | 0.328 | 0.072 | 0.552 | 0.318 | 0.309 | -0.014 | 0.076 | 0.082 | 0.141 | 0.600* | |
根Root | -0.239 | -0.035 | 0.315 | 0.578* | 0.178 | -0.684* | -0.190 | 0.247 | 0.071 | 0.024 | |
P | 叶Leaf | 0.623* | 0.250 | 0.179 | 0.202 | 0.977** | -0.185 | -0.560 | -0.480 | -0.023 | 0.347 |
茎Stem | 0.232 | 0.035 | 0.035 | -0.040 | 0.323 | 0.097 | 0.398 | 0.375 | -0.595* | 0.053 | |
根Root | -0.305 | -0.146 | -0.493 | -0.435 | -0.529 | 0.211 | 0.151 | 0.110 | -0.150 | -0.490 | |
C/N | 叶Leaf | 0.391 | 0.101 | -0.337 | -0.621* | 0.138 | 0.643* | -0.660* | -0.707* | -0.454 | -0.126 |
茎Stem | 0.032 | -0.010 | -0.606* | -0.505 | -0.008 | 0.294 | -0.568 | 0.588* | -0.446 | -0.578* | |
根Root | 0.381 | 0.284 | -0.318 | -0.620* | 0.056 | 0.716* | -0.438 | -0.477 | -0.097 | 0.142 | |
C/P | 叶Leaf | -0.414 | -0.256 | -0.261 | -0.384 | -0.727** | 0.385 | 0.173 | 0.078 | -0.243 | -0.453 |
茎Stem | 0.129 | 0.125 | -0.035 | -0.176 | -0.100 | 0.357 | -0.017 | -0.044 | 0.449 | 0.127 | |
根Root | 0.449 | 0.316 | 0.267 | 0.188 | 0.666* | -0.098 | -0.515 | -0.468 | -0.046 | 0.441 | |
N/P | 叶Leaf | -0.680* | -0.348 | -0.096 | -0.069 | -0.911** | 0.069 | 0.622* | 0.544 | 0.047 | -0.414 |
茎Stem | 0.025 | 0.059 | 0.332 | 0.204 | -0.170 | 0.104 | 0.448 | 0.434 | 0.715** | 0.423 | |
根Root | 0.241 | 0.048 | 0.396 | 0.482 | 0.522 | -0.450 | -0.178 | -0.116 | 0.010 | 0.294 |
Table 7
Monte Carlo test of environmental factors
土壤因子 Soil factors | 叶 Leaf | 茎 Stem | 根 Root | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
解释率 Explains /% | F | P | 解释率 Explains /% | F | P | 解释率 Explains /% | F | P | |
pH | 28.7 | 4.0 | 0.040 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.820 | 9.2 | 1.0 | 0.424 |
EC | 5.9 | 0.6 | 0.564 | 0.8 | <0.1 | 0.934 | 7.0 | 0.8 | 0.450 |
C | 5.8 | 0.6 | 0.500 | 11.5 | 1.3 | 0.266 | 14.9 | 1.8 | 0.198 |
N | 13.0 | 1.5 | 0.222 | 9.8 | 1.1 | 0.382 | 25.5 | 3.4 | 0.042 |
P | 55.6 | 12.5 | 0.002 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 0.504 | 18.0 | 2.2 | 0.146 |
C/N | 12.3 | 1.4 | 0.250 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 0.516 | 24.1 | 3.2 | 0.062 |
C/P | 26.0 | 3.5 | 0.040 | 19.2 | 2.4 | 0.114 | 13.9 | 1.6 | 0.194 |
N/P | 22.5 | 2.9 | 0.064 | 19.3 | 2.4 | 0.126 | 13.6 | 1.6 | 0.254 |
K | 6.1 | 0.7 | 0.522 | 30.3 | 4.3 | 0.012 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.936 |
Na | 13.9 | 1.6 | 0.206 | 12.2 | 1.4 | 0.264 | 11.3 | 1.3 | 0.308 |
Table 8
Stoichiometric characteristics of plant organs in different regions
区域/植物种类 Region/plant species | 器官 Organ | C (g·kg-1) | N (g·kg-1) | P (g·kg-1) | C/N | C/P | N/P | 参考文献 References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
藜科植物 | 本研究 This study | 叶Leaf | 301.81 | 19.68 | 1.00 | 15.39 | 334.04 | 21.79 | 本研究 |
茎Stem | 337.97 | 14.54 | 0.95 | 23.58 | 377.61 | 16.32 | |||
根Root | 421.36 | 10.57 | 0.94 | 41.69 | 485.88 | 12.59 | |||
全国平均 Average in China | 叶Leaf | 436.80 | 14.14 | 1.21 | 30.90 | 393.50 | 12.70 | [ | |
茎Stem | 448.30 | 3.04 | 0.31 | 147.50 | 1446.10 | 9.80 | |||
根Root | 418.20 | 4.85 | 0.47 | 86.20 | 889.80 | 10.30 | |||
全球平均 Global average | 叶Leaf | 464.00 | 17.66 | 1.58 | 22.50 | 232.00 | 13.07 | [ | |
中国湿地植物 wetland plants in China | 叶Leaf | 16.07 | 1.85 | 8.67 | [ | ||||
荒漠植物 Desert plants | 叶Leaf | 451.65 | 16.98 | 1.08 | 29.83 | 577.68 | 19.34 | [ | |
根Root | 443.62 | 7.44 | 1.06 | 59.64 | 418.91 | 7.02 | [ | ||
滨海藜科植物 Chenopodiaceae in coastal wetlands | 叶Leaf | 230.16 | 14.87 | 1.52 | 16.25 | 159.62 | 10.02 | [ | |
滦河口湿地藜科植物 Chenopodiaceae in luanhe estuary wetland | 叶Leaf | 212.40 | 9.68 | 0.86 | 22.03 | 249.88 | 11.33 | [ | |
新疆藜科植物 Chenopodiaceae in Xinjiang | 叶Leaf | 336.63 | 22.51 | 2.02 | 17.54 | 430.08 | 24.64 | [ | |
禾本科盐生植物 Gramineae halophytes | 叶Leaf | 433.39 | 18.80 | 0.95 | 23.93 | 475.04 | 20.76 | [ |
1 | ACHAT D L, AUGUSTO L, GALLET-BUDYNEK A,et al. Future challenges in coupled C-N-P cycle models for terrestrial ecosystems under global change:a review[J]. Biogeochemistry,2016,131(1/2):173-202. |
2 | 薛琼琼,赵露露,王云霞,等.盐生植物耐盐性研究进展[J].中国野生植物资源,2021,40(5):60-65. |
XUE Q Q, ZHAO L L, WANG Y X,et al.Research progress on salt tolerance of halophytes[J].Chinese Wild Plant Resources,2021,40(5):60-65. | |
3 | 葛瑶,栾明鉴,张雪楠,等.中国盐生植物分布与盐碱地类型的关系[J].齐鲁工业大学学报,2021,35(2):14-20. |
GE Y, LUAN M J, ZHANG X N,et al.The relationship between the distribution of halophytes in China and the types of saline-alkali land[J].Journal of Qilu University of Technology,2021,35(2):14-20. | |
4 | 韩占江,程龙,李志军.塔里木盆地10种藜科植物种子萌发对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性评价[J].植物研究,2016,36(2):266-273. |
HAN Z J, CHENG L, LI Z J.Response of germination on ten Chenopodiaceae seeds to drought stress and resistances evaluation in Tarim Basin[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,2016,36(2):266-273. | |
5 | 贺金生,韩兴国.生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):2-6. |
HE J S, HAN X G.Ecological stoichiometry:searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2010,34(1):2-6. | |
6 | 李征,韩琳,刘玉虹,等.滨海盐地碱蓬不同生长阶段叶片C、N、P化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2012,36(10):1054-1061. |
LI Z, HAN L, LIU Y H,et al.C,N and P stoichiometric characteristics in leaves of Suaeda salsa during different growth phase in coastal wetlands of China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2012,36(10):1054-1061. | |
7 | 谭海霞,金照光,孙富强,等.滦河口典型盐生植物的生态化学计量特征研究[J].植物研究,2018,38(6):956-960. |
TAN H X, JIN Z G, SUN F Q,et al.Stoichiometry characteristics of typical halophytes in Luanhe estuary wetland[J].Bulletin of Botanical Research,2018,38(6):956-960. | |
8 | 雍艳华,张霞,王绍明,等.新疆典型盐生植物营养器官盐分积累与生态化学计量特征[J].植物生态学报,2016,40(12):1267-1275. |
YONG Y H, ZHANG X, WANG S M,et al.Salt accumulation in vegetative organs and ecological stoichiometry characteristics in typical halophytes in Xinjiang,China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2016,40(12):1267-1275. | |
9 | REICH P B, OLEKSYN J.Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2004,101(30):11001-11006. |
10 | ELSER J J, FAGAN W F, DENNO R F,et al.Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs[J].Nature,2000,408(6812):578-580. |
11 | 张建锋,张旭东,周金星,等.盐分胁迫对杨树苗期生长和土壤酶活性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(3):426-430. |
ZHANG J F, ZHANG X D, ZHOU J X,et al.Effects of salinity stress on poplars seedling growth and soil enzyme activity[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(3):426-430. | |
12 | 张建新,葛淑芳,吴玉环,等.干旱胁迫对紫金牛叶片碳氮代谢的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):278-282. |
ZHANG J X, GE S F, WU Y H,et al.Effects of drought stress on carbon and nitrogen metabolism of Ardisia japonica leaves[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2015,29(2):278-282. | |
13 | 张剑,齐璇璇,刘冬,等.干旱区湿地芦苇各器官生态化学计量对土壤因子的响应[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(3):701-711. |
ZHANG J, QI X X, LIU D,et al.Stoichiometric responses of Phragmites australis organs to soil factors in a wetland from arid area[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2021,40(3):701-711. | |
14 | 荣戗戗,刘京涛,夏江宝,等.莱州湾湿地柽柳叶片N、P生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(12):3032-3037. |
RONG Q Q, LIU J T, XIA J B,et al.Leaf N and P stoichiometry of Tamarix chinensis L.in Laizhou Bay wetland,Shandong Province of east China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(12):3032-3037. | |
15 | 王利伟.柴达木盆地盐湖盐沼带植物生态化学计量学研究[D].北京:中国地质大学,2019. |
WANG L W.Eco-stoichiometry on plants in salt marsh zone of salt lakes in Qaidam Basin[D].Beijing:China University of Geosciences,2019. | |
16 | TANG Z Y, XU W T, ZHOU G Y,et al.Patterns of plant carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus concentration in relation to productivity in China's terrestrial ecosystems[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2018,115(16):4033-4038. |
17 | 胡伟芳,章文龙,张林海,等.中国主要湿地植被氮和磷生态化学计量学特征[J].植物生态学报,2014,38(10):1041-1052. |
HU W F, ZHANG W L, ZHANG L H,et al.Stoichiometric characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in major wetland vegetation of China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2014,38(10):1041-1052. | |
18 | 孙力,贡璐,朱美玲,等.塔里木盆地北缘荒漠典型植物叶片化学计量特征及其与土壤环境因子的关系[J].生态学杂志,2017,36(5):1208-1214. |
SUN L, GONG L, ZHU M L,et al.Leaf stoichiometric characteristics of typical desert plants and their relationships to soil environmental factors in the northern margin of the Tarin Basin[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2017,36(5):1208-1214. | |
19 | 安申群,贡璐,朱美玲,等.塔里木盆地北缘典型荒漠植物根系化学计量特征及其与土壤理化因子的关系[J].生态学报,2017,37(16):5444-5450. |
AN S Q, GONG L, ZHU M L,et al.Root stoichiometric characteristics of desert plants and their correlation with soil physicochemical factors in the northern Tarim Basin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(16):5444-5450. | |
20 | HAN W X, FANG J Y, GUO D L,et al.Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J].New Phytologist,2005,168(2):377-385. |
21 | 张天霖,邱治军,吴仲民,等.粤北针阔混交林不同器官碳氮磷钾的生态化学计量特征[J].林业科学研究,2021,34(2):149-157. |
ZHANG T L, QIU Z J, WU Z M,et al.Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium in organs of coniferous-broadleaved mixed forest in northern Guangdong[J].Forest Research,2021,34(2):149-157. | |
22 | STERNER R W, HESSEN D O.Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1994,25:1-29. |
23 | 吴统贵,陈步峰,肖以华,等.珠江三角洲3种典型森林类型乔木叶片生态化学计量学[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(1):58-63. |
WU T G, CHEN B F, XIAO Y H,et al.Leaf stoichiometry of trees in three forest types in Pearl River Delta,South China[J].Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2010,34(1):58-63. | |
24 | 李红林,贡璐,洪毅.克里雅绿洲旱生芦苇根茎叶C、N、P化学计量特征的季节变化[J].生态学报,2016,36(20):6547-6555. |
LI H L, GONG L, HONG Y.Seasonal variations in C,N,and P stoichiometry of roots,stems,and leaves of Phragmites australis in the Keriya Oasis,Xinjiang,China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(20):6547-6555. | |
25 | 曾冬萍,蒋利玲,曾从盛,等.生态化学计量学特征及其应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5484-5492. |
ZENG D P, JIANG L L, ZENG C S,et al.Reviews on the ecological stoichiometry characteristics and its applications[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(18):5484-5492. | |
26 | KOERSELMAN W, MEULEMAN A F M.The vegetation N:P ratio:a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450. |
27 | 王振南,杨惠敏.植物碳氮磷生态化学计量对非生物因子的响应[J].草业科学,2013,30(6):927-934. |
WANG Z N, YANG H M.Response of ecological stoichiometry of carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus in plants to abiotic environmental factors[J].Pratacultural Science,2013,30(6):927-934. | |
28 | YAN K, DUAN C Q, FU D G,et al.Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of plant communities in geochemically phosphorus-enriched soils in a subtropical mountainous region,SW China[J].Environmental Earth Sciences,2015,74(5):3867-3876. |
29 | 龚雪伟,吕光辉,马玉,等.艾比湖流域2种典型荒漠盐生植物冠下土与叶片的生态化学计量特征[J].林业科学,2017,53(4):28-36. |
GONG X W, LÜ G H, MA Y,et al.Ecological stoichiometry characteristics in the soil under crown and leaves of two desert halophytes with soil salinity gradients in ebinur lake basin[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2017,53(4):28-36. | |
30 | 曾嬿冰.马尾松优良种源N、K利用效率及营养元素吸收变化的研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2016. |
ZENG Y B.The research on N,K use efficiency and nutrient absorption changes of excellent provenances of Pinus massoniana [D].Guiyang:Guizhou University,2016. |
[1] | ZHANG Shu-Qi, XU Quan, YAO Hai-Rong, YANG Qiu, LIU Wen-Jie, WANG Meng. Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Contents and Their Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics in Leaves of Casuarina equisetifolia and Ipomoea pes-caprae in the Coastal Zone of Hainan Island [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(2): 224-232. |
[2] | WAN Xue-Bing, WANG Qing-Gui, YAN Guo-Yong, XING Ya-Juan. Response of Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Plant Leaves to Long-term N Deposition in Natural Secondary Forest [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(3): 407-420. |
[3] | GUO Hao, ZHUANG Wei-Wei, LI Jin. Characteristics of Biomass and Stoichiometry of Four Desert Herbaceous Plants In the Gurbantunggut Desert [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(3): 421-430. |
[4] | TAN Hai-Xia, JIN Zhao-Guang, SUN Fu-Qiang, PENG Hong-Li, YANG Zhuo, GENG Shi-Gang. Stoichiometry Characteristics of Typical Halophytes in Luanhe Estuary Wetland [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(6): 956-960. |
[5] | ZHOU Yang, ZHANG Dan-Ju, SONG Si-Meng, LI Xun, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Jian. Forest Gaps Size on Pinus massoniana Plantation of Three Natural Regeneration Herb N and P Stoichiometry [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(6): 915-925. |
[6] | ZHAO Long, WANG Hua, LIANG Zheng-Wei, ZHANG Zhong-Hua, TANG Zhong-Hua, NIE Si-Ming, ZHAO Dong-Mei. Leaf N and P Stoichiometry of Leymus chinensis in Relation to Soil Properties in Saline-alkali Degraded Grassland [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2016, 36(5): 768-774. |
[7] | HAN Zhan-Jiang;CHENG Long;LI Zhi-Jun*. Response of Germination on Ten Chenopodiaceae Seeds to Drought Stress and Resistances Evaluation in Tarim Basin [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2016, 36(2): 266-273. |
[8] | PAN Hua;WANG Bo-Wen*. Analysis on the Dynamic Relationships between Plant Community Characteristicsand Soil Factors in Western Songnen Saline-alkaline Grassland [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2013, 33(6): 701-708. |
[9] | HU Rui;SU Xue;YAN Min-Sheng;SUN Kun*. Effects of Pb(Ⅱ) on Seed Germination of Three Different Plants of Chenopodiaceae [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2009, 29(3): 362-367. |
[10] | WANG Yi-Feng;WANG Jun-Long. Study on the chenopodiaceae in Gansu [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2006, 26(6): 742-749. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||