Bulletin of Botanical Research ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 307-320.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2024.02.016
• Plant synecology • Previous Articles
Haoran ZHOU1,2, Honggang SUN2, Peng ZHANG1(), Yuanyuan HAN2, Wenhua LI2,3
Received:
2023-09-15
Online:
2024-03-20
Published:
2024-03-11
Contact:
Peng ZHANG
E-mail:zhangpeng@nefu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Haoran ZHOU, Honggang SUN, Peng ZHANG, Yuanyuan HAN, Wenhua LI. Effect of Species-mixing on the Growth, Structure and Productivity of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Elaeocarpus sylvestris Mixed Forests[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2024, 44(2): 307-320.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://bbr.nefu.edu.cn/EN/10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2024.02.016
Table 1
Growth characteristics of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris in the pure and mixed stands
树种 Species | 林型 Stand type | 林分密度 Stand density/ (tree·hm-2) | 胸径 Diameter at breast height/cm | 树高 Tree height/ m | 枝下高 Height to crown base/m | 冠长 Crown length/ m | 冠幅 Crown width/ m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
杉木C. lanceolata | 混交林mixed | 1 550±167 a | 16.23±0.10 a | 13.84±1.24 a | 7.35±1.41 a | 6.42±1.98 a | 2.43±0.20 b |
纯林pure | 1 542±106 a | 14.39±0.78 b | 13.64±1.18 a | 6.98±1.43 ab | 6.82±1.74 a | 2.36±0.26 b | |
山杜英E. sylvestris | 混交林mixed | 1 550±167 a | 10.93±1.14 c | 10.22±1.59 c | 5.70±0.87 b | 3.92±0.89 b | 3.17±0.52 a |
纯林pure | 1 533±17 a | 13.56±1.23 b | 12.03±1.63 b | 5.83±0.92 ab | 5.80±0.35 ab | 3.22±0.62 a |
Table 3
Characters distribution of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris diameter class in the pure and mixed stands
树种 Species | 林型 Stand type | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|
杉木C. lanceolata | 混交林Mixed | -0.58±0.52 | 0.13±0.35 |
纯林Pure | 0.08±0.20 | -0.87±0.16 | |
混交林/纯林Mixed/Pure | -6.16±3.19 | -0.19±0.42 | |
山杜英E. sylvestris | 混交林Mixed | 0.54±0.35 | -0.28±0.37 |
纯林Pure | -2.64±0.05 | 5.29±0.09 | |
混交林/纯林Mixed/Pure | -0.30±0.28 | -0.11±0.16 |
Table 4
Morphological traits of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris in the pure and mixed stand
树种 Species | 林型 Stand type | 高径比 Tree height/Diameter | 冠长率 Crown length/Tree height | 冠径比 Crown diameter/Diameter |
---|---|---|---|---|
杉木C. lanceolata | 混交林Mixed | 0.87±0.04 b | 0.33±0.04 b | 0.18±0.02 b |
纯林Pure | 0.95±0.03 a | 0.36±0.02 b | 0.17±0.02 b | |
山杜英E. sylvestris | 混交林Mixed | 0.96±0.04 a | 0.52±0.07 a | 0.28±0.03 a |
纯林Pure | 0.85±0.03 b | 0.46±0.03 a | 0.24±0.07 ab |
Table 5
Standardized major axis(SMA) regression parameters of root-stem of trees of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris in the pure and mixed stands
树种 Species | 林型 Stand type | 决定系数 Determination coefficient(R2 ) | 显著性 Significance(P) | 斜率(95%置信区间) Slope(95% CIs) | 截距(95%置信区间) Intercept(95%CIs) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
杉木 C. lanceolata | 纯林Pure | 0.613 | <0.001 | 1.166[1.073,1.268]c | -1.498[-1.731,-1.264] |
混交林Mixed | 0.697 | <0.001 | 0.770[0.661,0.896]d | -1.118[-1.407,-0.829] | |
山杜英 E. sylvestris | 纯林Pure | 0.737 | <0.001 | 1.305[1.232,1.382]b | -1.888[-2.084,-1.692] |
混交林Mixed | 0.796 | <0.001 | 1.689[1.524,1.872]a | -3.326[-3.781,-2.871] |
Table 6
Standardized major axis(SMA) regression parameters of root-stem of trees of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris in the pure and mixed stands in different slope position
树种 Species | 林型 Stand type | 坡位 Slope position | 决定系数 Determination coefficient(R2 ) | 显著性 Significance(P) | 斜率(95%置信区间) Slope(95% CIs) | 截距(95%置信区间) Intercept(95% CIs) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
杉木 C.lanceolata | 混交林 Mixed | 上Upper | 0.731 | <0.001 | 0.795[0.606,1.043]a | -1.153[-1.663,-0.642] |
中Middle | 0.794 | <0.001 | 0.617[0.486,0.783]a | -0.801[-1.166,-0.436] | ||
下Down | 0.588 | <0.001 | 0.275[0.197,0.384]b | 0.177[-0.061,0.416] | ||
纯林 Pure | 上Upper | 0.857 | <0.001 | 1.453[1.328,1.590]a | -2.148[-2.452,-1.845] | |
中Middle | 0.728 | <0.001 | 0.911[0.805,1.031]b | -0.816[-1.089,-0.543] | ||
下Down | 0.511 | <0.001 | 0.465[0.394,0.549]c | 0.135[-0.054,0.325] | ||
山杜英 E.sylvestris | 混交林 Mixed | 上Upper | 0.889 | <0.001 | 1.855[1.612,2.133]a | -3.679[-4.334,-3.025] |
中Middle | 0.846 | <0.001 | 1.817[1.541,2.142]a | -3.709[-4.497,-2.921] | ||
下Down | 0.466 | <0.001 | 1.205[0.890,1.632]b | -2.039[-3.039,-1.038] | ||
纯林 Pure | 上Upper | 0.764 | <0.001 | 1.445[1.314,1.589]a | -2.159[-2.505,-1.813] | |
中Middle | 0.873 | <0.001 | 1.421[1.325,1.524]a | -2.249[-2.514,-1.983] | ||
下Down | 0.476 | <0.001 | 0.987[0.856,1.137]b | -1.057[-1.435,-0.679] |
Table 7
Habitat factors of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris mixed stands under different slope positions
坡位 Slpoe position | 光照强度 Light intensity/lx | 土壤含水率 Soil water content/% | 土壤酸碱度 Soil pH | 土壤有机质 Soil organic matter/ (g·kg-1) | 土壤温度 Soil temperature/ ℃ | 土壤水解性氮 Soil hydrolysable nitrogen/(mg·kg-1) | 土壤有效磷 Soil available phosphorus(mg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
上Upper | 675.92±62.17a | 30.91±2.68b | 4.57±0.07 a | 19.72±3.12 c | 20.35±1.00 a | 97.56±1.71 c | 1.47±0.08 c |
中Middle | 665.87±72.99a | 30.94±1.37b | 4.46±0.09 b | 21.74±0.79 b | 19.82±0.69 ab | 115.71±8.56 b | 1.80±0.08 b |
下Lower | 675.71±36.46a | 33.92±0.93a | 4.32±0.06 c | 26.93±1.28 a | 19.38±0.72 b | 145.76±3.66 a | 2.19±0.07 a |
Table 8
Results of forward selection on growth characters and environmental factors of C. lanceolata and E. sylvestris mixed stands
环境因子 Environmental factor | 环境因子与RDA前两轴的相关系数 Correlation coefficient of environmental factor and RDA axis | 蒙特卡洛检验结果 Result of Monte Carlo test | 重要性排序 Importance rankings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1轴 RDA 1 | 第2轴 RDA 2 | F | P | ||
土壤有效磷 Soil available phosphorus | 0.976 | -0.029 | 28.7 | 0.002 | 1 |
光照强度 Light intensity | 0.018 | 0.930 | 9.0 | 0.002 | 2 |
土壤酸碱度 Soil pH | -0.812 | 0.361 | 3.2 | 0.046 | 3 |
土壤水解性氮 Soil hydrolysable nitrogen | 0.972 | 0.113 | 1.6 | 0.184 | 4 |
土壤温度 Soil temperature | -0.518 | 0.047 | 0.8 | 0.484 | 5 |
土壤有机质 Soil organic matter | 0.839 | -0.100 | 0.9 | 0.378 | 6 |
土壤含水率 Soil water content | 0.588 | -0.166 | 1.3 | 0.272 | 7 |
1 | VAN DER PLAS F.Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities[J].Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society,2019,94(4):1220-1245. |
2 | STIMM K, HEYM M, NAGEL R V,et al.Long-term productivity of monospecific and mixed Oak(Quercus petraea[Matt.] Liebl.and Quercus robur L.) stands in Germany:growth dynamics and the effect of stand structure[J].Forests,2022,13(5):724. |
3 | CONDÉS S, PRETZSCH H, DEL RÍO M.Species admixture can increase potential tree growth and reduce competition[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2023,539:120997. |
4 | THURM E A, PRETZSCH H.Improved productivity and modified tree morphology of mixed versus pure stands of European beech(Fagus sylvatica) and Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii) with increasing precipitation and age[J].Annals of Forest Science,2016,73(4):1047-1061. |
5 | 蒋妙定,周子贵,孙敏华,等.杉木混交林营造技术及效益研究[J].浙江林业科技,1993(2):10-18. |
JIANG M D, ZHOU Z G, SUN M H,et al.Study on forestation technique and effect of Chinese fir mixed forest[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology,1993(2):10-18. | |
6 | MINA M, HUBER M O, FORRESTER D I,et al.Multiple factors modulate tree growth complementarity in central European mixed forests[J].Journal of Ecology,2018,106(3):1106-1119. |
7 | BOUILLET J P, LACLAU J P, DE MORAES GONÇALVES J L,et al. Eucalyptus and Acacia tree growth over entire rotation in single- and mixed-species plantations across five sites in Brazil and Congo[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2013,301:89-101. |
8 | BRUNNER A, FORRESTER D I.Tree species mixture effects on stem growth vary with stand density:an analysis based on individual tree responses[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2020,473:118334. |
9 | HUNT M A, UNWIN G L, BEADLE C L.Effects of naturally regenerated Acacia dealbata on the productivity of a Eucalyptus nitens plantation in Tasmania,Australia[J].Forest Ecology and Management,1999,117(1/2/3):75-85. |
10 | 臧颢,黄锦程,刘洪生,等.杉木人工林碳汇木材多功能经营的最优轮伐期[J].北京林业大学学报,2022,44(10):120-128. |
ZANG H, HUANG J C, LIU H S,et al.Optimal rotation period of carbon sequestration wood multifunctional management in Chinese fir plantation[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2022,44(10):120-128. | |
11 | 靳云铎,白彦锋,沈杨阳,等.施肥和凋落物添加对杉木人工林土壤养分和土壤微生物特性的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2021,40(5):72-80. |
JIN Y D, BAI Y F, SHEN Y Y,et al.Effects of fertilization and litter addition on soil nutrient and soil microbial properties of Chinese fir plantation[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2021,40(5):72-80. | |
12 | 卢善土.杉木-山杜英混交林林分生产力及生态效益的研究[J].福建林学院学报,1998,18(4):348-351. |
LU S T.A study on productivity and ecological benefit in mixed stand of Chinese fir and Elaeocarpus sylvestris [J].Journal of Fujian College of Forestry,1998,18(4):348-351. | |
13 | NIKOLOVA P S, ZANG C, PRETZSCH H.Combining tree-ring analyses on stems and coarse roots to study the growth dynamics of forest trees:a case study on Norway spruce(Picea abies[L.] H.Karst)[J].Trees,2011,25(5):859-872. |
14 | HOLMES R L.Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement[J].Tree-ring Bulletin,1983,43:51-67. |
15 | 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-101. |
BAO S D.Soil agricultural chemistry analysis[M].3rd ed.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2000:30-101. | |
16 | 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:12-19. |
LU R K.Soil agricultural chemistry analysis methods[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000:12-19. | |
17 | 刘景芳,童书振.编制杉木林分密度管理图研究报告[J].林业科学,1980,16(4):241-251. |
LIU J F, TONG S Z.Research report of compilation the management map of Chinese fir stand density[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,1980,16(4):241-251. | |
18 | 孟宪宇.测树学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006:32-74. |
MENG X Y.Forest mensuration[M].Beijing:China Forestry Publishing House,2006:32-74. | |
19 | 刘景芳,黄道年,何智英,等.全国杉木(实生林)地位指数表的编制与应用[J].林业科学,1982,18(3):266-278. |
LIU J F, HUANG D N, HE Z Y,et al.Compilation and application of the national Chinese fir(seed forest) site index table[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,1982,18(3):266-278. | |
20 | PRETZSCH H, STECKEL M, HEYM M,et al.Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine(Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak(Q.robur L.,Quercus petraea(Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe[J].European Journal of Forest Research,2020,139(3):349-367. |
21 | CHOMEL M, DESROCHERS A, BALDY V,et al.Non-additive effects of mixing hybrid poplar and white spruce on aboveground and soil carbon storage in boreal plantations[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2014,328:292-299. |
22 | WARTON D I, DUURSMA R A, FALSTER D S,et al.smatr 3- an R package for estimation and inference about allometric lines[J].Methods in Ecology and Evolution,2012,3(2):257-259. |
23 | RIOFRÍO J, DEL RÍO M, PRETZSCH H,et al.Changes in structural heterogeneity and stand productivity by mixing Scots pine and Maritime pine[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2017,405:219-228. |
24 | 张强,林雄,马化武.山杜英大苗引进栽培及园林应用表现[J].林业实用技术,2007(10):42-43. |
ZHANG Q, LIN X, MA H W.Introduced cultivation and garden application performance of Elacocarpus sylvestris seedlings[J].Practical Forestry Technology,2007(10):42-43. | |
25 | ISHII H, ASANO S.The role of crown architecture,leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests[J].Ecological Research,2010,25(4):715-722. |
26 | GHORBANI M, SOHRABI H, SADATI S E,et al.Productivity and dynamics of pure and mixed-species plantations of Populous deltoids Bartr.ex Marsh and Alnus subcordata C.A.Mey[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2018,409:890-898. |
27 | 姚甲宝,曾平生,袁小平,等.间伐强度对木荷-萌芽杉木中龄混交林生长和林分结构的影响[J].林业科学研究,2017,30(3):511-517. |
YAO J B, ZENG P S, YUAN X P,et al.Impacts of thinning intensities on growth and stand structure of Schima superba-sprouting Cuninghamia lanceolata mixed plantation[J].Forest Research,2017,30(3):511-517. | |
28 | HARRINGTON T B, HARRINGTON C A, DEBELL D S.Effects of planting spacing and site quality on 25-year growth and mortality relationships of Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii var.menziesii)[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2009,258(1):18-25. |
29 | 何贵平,陈益泰,余元华,等.杉木、山杜英混交林及其纯林生物量研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2003,25(6):819-823. |
HE G P, CHEN Y T, YU Y H,et al.A study on the biomass of Pure and mixed stands of Elacocarpus sylvestris and Chinese fir[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitis Jiangxiensis,2003,25(6):819-823. | |
30 | HARPER J L.Population biology of plants[M].London:Academic Press,1977:347. |
31 | PEROT T, PICARD N.Mixture enhances productivity in a two-species forest:evidence from a modeling approach[J].Ecological Research,2012,27(1):83-94. |
32 | 李亚麒,孙继伟,李江飞,等.云南松不同家系苗木生物量分配及其异速生长[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(8):18-28. |
LI Y Q, SUN J W, LI J F,et al.Biomass allocation and its allometric growth of Pinus yunnanensis seedlings of different families[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2021,43(8):18-28. | |
33 | PRETZSCH H, BIBER P.Tree species mixing can increase maximum stand density[J].Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2016,46(10):1179-1193. |
34 | 郭强,官凤英,辉朝茂,等.密度和施肥调控对巨龙竹新竹生长及生物量特征的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2022,44(4):95-106. |
GUO Q, GUAN F Y, HUI C M,et al.Effects of density and fertilization on growth and biomass characteristics of newly grown Dendrocalamus sinicus [J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2022,44(4):95-106. | |
35 | 闫小莉,林智熠,胡文佳,等.杉木根系形态特征及其觅养策略研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2022,35(1):26-31. |
YAN X L, LIN Z Y, HU W J,et al.Root morphological characteristics of Cunninghamia lanceolata and its foraging strategies[J].World Forestry Research,2022,35(1):26-31. | |
36 | ZAPATER M, HOSSANN C, BRÉDA N,et al.Evidence of hydraulic lift in a young beech and oak mixed forest using 18O soil water labelling[J].Trees,2011,25(5):885-894. |
37 | JACKSON R B, SCHENK H J, JOBBÁGY E G,et al.Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models[J].Ecological Applications,2000,10(2):470-483. |
38 | 朱凯月,王庆成,吴文娟.林隙大小对蒙古栎和水曲柳人工更新幼树生长和形态的影响[J].林业科学,2017,53(4):150-157. |
ZHU K Y, WANG Q C, WU W J.Effect of gap size on growth and morphology of transplanted saplings of Quercus mongolica and Fraxinus mandshurica [J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2017,53(4):150-157. | |
39 | THURM E A, BIBER P, PRETZSCH H.Stem growth is favored at expenses of root growth in mixed stands and humid conditions for Douglas-fir(Pseudotsuga menziesii) and European beech(Fagus sylvatica)[J].Trees,2017,31(1):349-365. |
40 | BERTNESS M D, CALLAWAY R.Positive interactions in communities[J].Trends in Ecology and Evolution,1994,9(5):191-193. |
41 | PRETZSCH H, BLOCK J, DIELER J,et al.Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient[J].Annals of Forest Science,2010,67(7):712. |
42 | 石媛媛,邓明军,唐健,等.基于空间分析的森林土壤养分分级方法[J].草业科学,2016,33(6):1112-1117. |
SHI Y Y, DENG M J, TANG J,et al.Forest soil nutrient classification method based on spatial analysis[J].Pratacultural Science,2016,33(6):1112-1117. | |
43 | 曹升,胡华英,张虹,等.我国南方人工林土壤有效磷匮乏原因及对策分析[J].世界林业研究,2019,32(3):78-84. |
CAO S, HU H Y, ZHANG H. et al.Causes and countermeasures of plantation soil available phosphorus deficiency in southern China[J].World Forestry Research,2019,32(3):78-84. | |
44 | 曹翠玲,毛圆辉,曹朋涛,等.低磷胁迫对豇豆幼苗叶片光合特性及根系生理特性的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(6):1373-1378. |
CAO C L, MAO Y H, CAO P T,et al.Effect of phosphorous stress on photosynthesis rate and root physiological characteristic of Cowpea seedlings[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers,2010,16(6):1373-1378. | |
45 | 许静静,李琦,吴文景,等.垂直方向磷素竞争对杉木根系生长及生物量分配的影响[J].生态学报,2019,39(6):2071-2081. |
XU J J, LI Q, WU W J,et al.Effects of vertical phosphorus competition on root growth and biomass distribution of Chinese fir seedlings[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(6):2071-2081. |
[1] | Xinggang Tang, Yingdan Yuan, Jinchi Zhang. Effects of Climate Change on the Suitable Area and Niche of Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(1): 151-160. |
[2] | ZHU Li-Kui, TANG Liang, ZHAO Bei-Bei, LU Zhao-Geng, WANG Li. Morphological and Structural Changes during Male Cones Development in Cunninghamia lanceolata [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(3): 349-356. |
[3] | LÜHai-Liang;MAO Zi-Jun*;LI Na. Response of Growth and Interspecific Competition of Pinus koraiensis and Quercus mongolica Seedlings to Drought [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2014, 34(3): 364-371. |
[4] | CHE Shao-Hui;ZHANG Jian-Guo*. Comparative Study on Stand Density Measures Based on Self-thinning Theory for Chinese Fir Plantation [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2012, 32(3): 343-347. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||