欢迎访问《植物研究》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

植物研究 ›› 1987, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 11-55.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国杭子梢属植物的研究

傅沛云   

  1. 中国科学院林业土壤研究所, 辽宁沈阳
  • 出版日期:1987-12-15 发布日期:2016-06-13
  • 基金资助:
    本项研究属于中国科学院科学基金资助的课题

A STUDY OF THE GENUS CAMPYLOTROPIS BUNGE IN CHINA

Fu Pei-yun   

  1. Institute of Forestry and Pedology, Academia Sinica, Shenyang, Liaoning
  • Online:1987-12-15 Published:2016-06-13
  • Supported by:
    Projects Supported by the Science Fund of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

摘要: 本文叙述了杭子梢属(gen.Campylotropis)植物的研究历史,说明在中国一共记录过59种杭子梢属植物,经过著者的研究整理,确定并提出了14种新的异名名称,经过详细考订,本属植物在中国已确知为29种、6变种、6变型。其中包括经发现和研究整理的新种4、新变种3、新变型3、新组合变种2、新组合变型3。此外尚有2个存疑种有待今后采集调查解决。本文历述了关于本属是否应该并入胡枝子属(gen.Lespedeza)这一问题所存在的长期争议之后,详细论述了本属与胡枝子属在特征上的异同诸点、进行了比较和分析,据此,明确地肯定本属与胡枝子属亲缘关系极为相近,但特征的分化已经必须确认本属应是与胡枝子属有明确区别的独立的属。此外,从特征分析中也可得出本属应是由胡枝子属大胡枝子组(sect.Macrolespedeza)演化发展而来的。本文在讨论了属内主要特征的演化趋势与种群关系之后,论述了本属在世界主要分布地区的种数和分布概况,同时将此与胡枝子属大胡枝子组的分布概况作了比较和分析,明确地认定我国机子梢属植物的大部分种类是本国西南地区发生的(中国有20个特有种),我国的西南地区是本属植物的分布中心,也是本属植物从较原始特征开始分化的一个特征分化多样化中心,并且此地区正是胡枝子属大胡枝子组与本属多数种类包括较原始种类分布相交叉的地区,因而我国的西南地区有可能即是本属植物的起源中心,并且这一起源应是与胡枝子属大胡枝子组植物分布到中国西南地区以后的分化发展想联系的。

Abstract: There are 29 species, 6 varieties and 6 forms from the genus which has been confirmed to occur in China based on fully studying the genus, in which 4 species, 3 varieties, 3 forms, 2 combinations of variety and 3 combinations of form are new. There are totaly 59 species recorded from the genus before, in which 14 species were considered as synonyms in this study. two species are doubtable and need more reseach to clear up in the future. The genus is so related to the genus Lespedeza that it's clas sificatory position has been a confusion since 19 century. It has been treated as a subgenus or a section of Lespedeza. It was not recognized by most of authors as a distinct genus until the last decades though there arc still some different opinions about it. Comparing the two groups of plants from Campylotropis and Lespedeza, it is quite clear that the former is a distinct genus different enough from the genus Lespedeza because of the features of the keel much incurved, acute and elongeted to a rost-riformed tip, caducous bracteole and little smaller meshes on the surface of pollens which make it a good genus besides other features. Moreover, the genus may have evolved from the section Macrolespedeza of the genus Lespedeza according to this study. The main evolutionary trend of the plants from Campylotrotis is that the persistent bract is more primitive feature than the caducous bract; the keel with much elongeted and acute long-rostriformed tip evolved from the one with brevirostriformed tip; the diadelphus stamen detached at the base developed into the one coherent at different levels. But it is difficult to make the intrageneric divisions of the genus because the features of the plants are not stable and overlaping to each other, which is resulting from their uneven evolution. The genus is distributed in the South-east part of Asia. As shown in the Table 1 and Figure 1, the distribution region is that the eastern boundary line is in the East China including Taiwan; toward the south only one species occur in Java in a disjunctive way and the northern boundary line is in the North China and Korea where only one species occurs. there are about 45 species from the genus on the earth, in which 29 species occur in China (not including the two doubtable species).Among 29 species 28 species are distributed in the Southwest China only, in which 20 species are endemic and originated here.Some of these plants are primitive and others more advanced. The number of species from the genus gradually or sharp reduced as their distribution areas deviate from the center of distribution, the South-west China to any directions. Moreover, it is the South-west China that is the region where the distri-bution area of the section Macrolespedeza of Lespedeza is overla-ping with the most of species of Campylotropis including the primitive ones. The following conclusion may be derived from the discussion above that the South-west China is not only the center of distribution and one of differentiation centers, but probable origination of the genus. Furthermore, the origination should be related to the differentiation and development of the section Macrolespedeza of Lespedeza after it arrived in the region of the South-west China (see Table 2).