The Allometry Growth of Pinus yunnanensis Seedlings from Different Families

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2021.06.015

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to understand the growth rate of Pinus yunnanensis Franch seedlings and the life history strategy of seedlings， the allometric growth of P. yunnanensis Franch. seedlings from different families was studied. The 49 annual families of P. yunnanensis were selected as materials， the allometric growth analysis method was used to the allometric growth of seedling height and ground diameter. The results showed that different families had different allometric growth index. The allometric growth index of 28 families was 1.0， which was in accordance with the geometric similarity model， and the other 21 families were allometric growth relationship. The results also showed that there were both allometric and isokinetic growth in seedling height and ground diameter among different families. Therefore， the difference of allometric growth mainly come from genetic differences， which reflected the resource utilization strategy of seedlings by adjusting their own resource allocation.

Key words: Pinus yunnanensis Franch., family, allometry, seedling height, ground diameter

CLC Number:

S791.257

Dan WANG, Ya-Qi LI, Ji-Wei SUN, Jiang-Fei LI, Shi CHEN, Yu-Lan XU, Nian-Hui CAI. The Allometry Growth of Pinus yunnanensis Seedlings from Different Families[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(6): 965-973.

Figures/Tables 3

Table 1

Growth and variation coefficient of seedling height and ground diameter of different families

家系 Family	苗高Seedling height（cm）				地径Ground diameter（mm）
家系 Family	平均值 Mean	最大值 Max	最小值 Min	变异系数 CV（%）	平均值 Mean	最大值 Max	最小值 Min	变异系数 CV（%）
1 104	7.74	11.5	2.4	23.30	4.06	7.38	1.45	37.56
1 108	7.54	10.5	3.9	19.53	4.39	8.49	1.50	34.33
1 109	7.79	12.4	5.5	21.46	3.86	6.82	2.32	27.90
1 112	5.47	7.8	4.0	20.01	4.09	7.02	1.20	38.08
1 115	8.49	13.7	3.7	26.45	4.69	9.55	1.71	38.60
1 118	6.87	10.6	3.0	25.11	3.39	5.43	0.95	37.77
1 121	7.28	11.7	4.0	27.73	3.42	7.63	1.23	42.32
1 123	6.70	11.4	2.8	34.03	3.59	8.73	1.02	47.12
1 124	6.38	8.7	3.9	16.09	2.92	4.38	1.44	27.54
1 125	7.08	11.4	4.1	26.07	3.27	6.32	1.40	38.29
1 128	7.06	10.2	3.8	23.40	4.30	5.99	1.27	27.86
1 130	6.38	10.7	3.3	27.79	3.84	8.35	0.97	49.89
1 131	7.47	10.8	4.5	21.36	3.18	5.70	1.23	35.10
1 133	6.95	10.1	4.5	20.41	3.90	7.01	0.79	34.14
1 134	6.56	10.6	4.0	25.43	2.96	6.55	0.83	49.06
1 139	6.13	8.7	1.3	26.50	4.10	7.00	1.06	39.50
1 142	4.72	6.8	2.8	26.08	2.19	4.36	0.86	47.14
1 143	4.81	6.8	2.7	27.66	3.28	7.64	0.76	69.17
1 145	5.97	8.3	3.8	16.63	3.17	5.56	1.31	35.69
1 146	6.83	9.2	4.8	17.50	3.48	6.37	1.56	32.38
1 147	7.64	11.0	3.7	22.98	4.05	7.20	1.02	38.25
1 150	4.87	9.4	2.7	31.99	2.52	6.44	0.73	58.19
1 151	5.38	10.1	2.8	35.27	2.96	6.55	1.05	54.14
1 153	6.41	12.5	3.4	32.88	2.47	4.32	0.96	43.30
1 155	7.51	11.4	5.0	19.41	4.45	6.74	1.51	31.02
2 101	7.07	10.6	4.3	22.68	4.07	7.49	1.22	36.37
2 103	4.99	6.4	3.1	18.13	3.14	5.38	1.07	40.15
2 104	7.75	11.5	4.1	22.23	4.28	7.07	1.32	37.54
2 107	6.30	9.5	4.3	21.08	3.23	6.22	1.46	32.59
2 109	6.22	10.1	2.3	25.02	3.81	7.25	0.71	43.98
2 112	6.07	10.8	3.4	28.73	2.99	5.92	1.08	39.97
2 113	7.47	14.4	4.7	26.78	4.37	9.53	1.06	36.53
2 114	7.51	11.7	3.7	25.25	4.11	7.37	0.59	38.74
2 115	9.09	21.8	4.8	39.33	4.07	7.68	1.04	42.80
2 118	8.00	12.2	5.7	19.74	3.45	6.20	1.72	28.52
2 121	5.28	7.7	3.2	22.64	3.28	5.89	1.19	40.45
2 126	3.86	7.6	1.7	48.66	2.20	5.96	0.62	78.71
2 127	6.21	9.8	2.6	22.87	2.86	5.99	0.63	43.40
2 128	16.33	25.4	5.4	31.85	3.52	5.96	1.13	30.46
2 134	6.64	11.7	3.5	27.90	2.47	6.80	0.97	47.60
2 136	11.00	19.4	4.3	33.56	2.82	5.22	1.28	38.80
2 137	8.37	16.1	4.2	30.49	4.19	8.26	1.53	42.77
2 141	5.25	10.1	2.3	31.65	2.63	5.99	0.60	48.46
2 142	7.86	11.9	2.4	26.82	3.26	7.17	0.93	41.46
2 143	4.57	5.7	2.8	19.82	2.67	7.23	1.05	57.41
2 145	8.83	14.4	5.0	23.51	4.04	11.30	1.56	46.43
2 151	10.16	14.8	5.8	18.63	4.71	7.49	1.51	30.69
2 152	7.66	18.4	2.8	34.16	2.79	5.20	0.93	39.82
2 153	9.16	15.0	3.6	32.17	2.93	4.86	0.77	38.98
总体Total	7.20	25.4	1.3	37.71	3.51	11.30	0.59	43.70

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Allometric growth of seedling height and ground diameter in different families

家系Family	n	R²	P	斜率Slope	95% CI	P-1.0	类型Type
1 104	33	0.457	0.000	0.847b	0.649~1.106	0.217	I
1 108	35	0.482	0.000	1.024b	0.795~1.317	0.853	I
1 109	37	0.061	0.139	0.645bc	0.465~0.984	0.009	A
1 112	27	0.307	0.003	1.421ab	1.015~1.190	0.041	A
1 115	35	0.049	0.202	0.805bc	0.574~1.130	0.207	I
1 118	23	0.470	0.000	0.743bc	0.537~1.028	0.071	I
1 121	35	0.343	0.000	0.716bc	0.539~1.950	0.022	A
1 123	36	0.619	0.000	0.743bc	0.600~1.920	0.007	A
1 124	39	0.029	0.303	0.783bc	0.567~1.081	0.136	I
1 125	33	0.592	0.000	0.677bc	0.537~0.857	0.001	A
1 128	36	0.205	0.006	0.726bc	0.535~0.986	0.041	A
1 130	33	0.700	0.000	1.080b	0.885~1.318	0.440	I
1 131	29	0.625	0.000	0.699bc	0.550~0.888	0.004	A
1 133	35	0.259	0.002	0.940b	0.696~1.269	0.681	I
1 134	33	0.430	0.000	0.870b	0.662~1.143	0.309	I
1 139	22	0.648	0.000	0.998b	0.759~1.311	0.988	I
1 142	27	0.805	0.000	0.840b	0.701~1.006	0.057	I
1 143	17	0.526	0.001	1.705a	1.177~2.470	0.007	A
1 145	36	0.390	0.000	1.140b	0.871~1.492	0.333	I
1 146	33	0.185	0.012	0.942b	0.680~1.303	0.714	I
1 147	36	0.539	0.000	0.884b	0.699~1.118	0.296	I
1 150	27	0.143	0.052	0.941b	0.648~1.366	0.746	I
1 151	33	0.586	0.000	0.846b	0.669~1.068	0.155	I
1 153	37	0.645	0.000	0.507c	0.414~0.622	0.000	A
1 155	31	0.294	0.002	0.948b	0.693~1.298	0.737	I
2 101	34	0.332	0.000	0.924b	0.691~1.235	0.587	I
2 103	30	0.444	0.000	1.394ab	1.048~1.853	0.023	A
2 104	35	0.358	0.000	0.932b	0.705~1.234	0.619	I
2 107	34	0.475	0.000	0.793bc	0.613~1.026	0.077	I
2 109	35	0.132	0.032	1.076b	0.778~1.488	0.654	I
2 112	61	0.299	0.000	0.685bc	0.552~0.851	0.001	A
2 113	34	0.061	0.158	0.797bc	0.566~1.122	0.191	I
2 114	34	0.484	0.000	0.839b	0.649~1.083	0.174	I
2 115	33	0.128	0.041	0.487c	0.348~0.681	0.000	A
2 118	36	0.329	0.000	0.622bc	0.469~0.825	0.001	A
2 121	27	0.555	0.000	1.112b	0.848~1.458	0.434	I
2 126	11	0.922	0.000	0.920b	0.746~1.134	0.393	I
2 127	22	0.435	0.001	0.874b	0.620~1.233	0.432	I
2 128	32	0.211	0.008	0.206cd	0.149~0.285	0.000	A
2 134	36	0.533	0.000	0.635bc	0.501~0.803	0.000	A
2 136	29	0.211	0.012	0.296cd	0.210~0.418	0.000	A
2 137	35	0.296	0.001	0.702bc	0.524~0.941	0.019	A
2 141	31	0.480	0.000	0.767bc	0.585~1.005	0.054	I
2 142	32	0.318	0.001	0.642bc	0.474~0.870	0.005	A
2 143	23	0.393	0.001	1.691a	1.195~2.392	0.004	A
2 145	38	0.105	0.048	0.903b	0.659~1.237	0.521	I
2 151	33	0.043	0.248	0.763bc	0.537~1.084	0.129	I
2 152	38	0.529	0.000	0.425c	0.338~0.535	0.000	A
2 153	28	0.333	0.001	0.388c	0.280~0.536	0.000	A

Table 3

References 45

1	Aiba S I，Kohyama T.Tree species stratification in relation to allometry and demography in a warm-temperate rain forest［J］.Journal of Ecology，1996，84（2）：207-218.
2	King D A.Allometry and life history of tropical trees［J］.Journal of Tropical Ecology，1996，12（1）：25-44.
3	刘春云，方文静，蔡琼，等.中国落叶松林胸径-树高相关关系的探讨［J］.北京大学学报：自然科学版，2017，53（6）：1081-1088.
	Liu C Y，Fang W J，Cai Q，et al.Allometric relationship between tree height and diameter of larch forests in China［J］.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis，2017，53（6）：1081-1088.
4	Weiner J，Thomas S C.Competition and allometry in three species of annual plants［J］.Ecology，1992，73（2）：648-656.
5	Shingleton A W.Allometry：the study of biological scaling［J］.Nature Education Knowledge，2010，3（10）：2.
6	韩文轩，方精云.相关生长关系与生态学研究中的尺度转换［J］.北京大学学报：自然科学版，2003，39（4）：583-593.
	Han W X，Fang J Y.Allometry and its application in ecological scaling［J］.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis，2003，39（4）：583-593.
7	童洁，石玉立.加格达奇3种森林类型树高-胸径的曲线拟合［J］.东北林业大学学报，2017，45（2）：6-11，21.
	Tong J，Shi Y L.Tree height-diameter model in Jiagedaqi［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2017，45（2）：6-11，21.
8	胡波，钟全林，程栋梁，等.刨花楠树高与胸径异速生长的关系［J］.沈阳大学学报：自然科学版，2012，24（3）：9-14.
	Hu B，Zhong Q L，Cheng D L，et al.Relationship between Machilus height and allometric growth of diameter at breast［J］.Journal of Shenyang University：Natural Sciences，2012，24（3）：9-14.
9	Mcmahon T A，Kronauer R E.Tree structures：deducing the principle of mechanical design［J］.Journal of Theoretical Biology，1976，59（2）：443-466.
10	Mcmahon T A.Size and shape in biology［J］.Science，1973，179（4079）：1201-1204.
11	Cheng D L，Li T，Zhong Q L，et al.Scaling relationship between tree respiration rates and biomass［J］.Biology Letters，2010，6（5）：715-717.
12	卢妮妮，王新杰，张鹏，等.不同林龄杉木胸径树高与冠幅的通径分析［J］.东北林业大学学报，2015，43（4）：12-16.
	Lu N N，Wang X J，Zhang P，et al.Path analysis between diameter at breast height，height and crown width of Cunninghamia lanceolata in different age［J］.Journal of Northeast Forestry University，2015，43（4）：12-16.
13	戴开结，何方，沈有信，等.云南松研究综述［J］.中南林学院学报，2006，26（2）：138-142.
	Dai K J，He F，Shen Y X，et al.Advances in the research on Pinus yunnanensis forest［J］.Journal of Central South Forestry University，2006，26（2）：138-142.
14	吴征镒，朱彦丞，姜汉侨，等.云南植被［M］.北京：科学出版社，1987：417-419.
	Wu Z Y，Zhu Y C，Jiang H Q，et al.Vegetation of Yunnan ［M］.Beijing：Science Press，1987：417-419.
15	刘玉芳，陈双林，郭子武，等.淹水对河竹鞭根系统生物量分配及异速生长模式的影响［J］.林业科学研究，2015，28（4）：502-507.
	Liu Y F，Chen S L，Gou Z W，et al.Effect of waterlogging on biomass allocation and allometric pattern of rhizome and root system of Phyllostachys rivalis［J］.Forest Research，2015，28（4）：502-507.
16	黄迎新，宋彦涛，范高华，等.灰绿藜形态性状与繁殖性状的异速关系［J］.草地学报，2015，23（5）：905-913.
	Huang Y X，Song Y T，Fan G H，et al.Allometric relationships between morphological and reproductive traits of Chenopodium glaucum［J］.Acta Agrestia Sinica，2015，23（5）：905-913.
17	李鑫，李昆，段安安，等.不同地理种源云南松幼苗生物量分配及其异速生长［J］.北京林业大学学报，2019，41（4）：41-50.
	Li X，Li K，Duan A A，et al.Biomass allocation and allometry of Pinus yunnanensis seedlings from different provenances［J］.Journal of Beijing Forestry University，2019，41（4）：41-50.
18	韩文轩，方精云.幂指数异速生长机制模型综述［J］.植物生态学报，2008，32（4）：951-960.
	Han W X，Fang J Y.Review on the mechanism models of allometric scaling laws：3/4 vs 2/3 power［J］.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology，2008，32（4）：951-960.
19	West B J，West D.Are allometry and macroevolution related？［J］.Physica A：Statistical Mechanics and its Applications，2011，390（10）：1733-1736.
20	Gould S J.Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny［J］.Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society，1966，41（4）：587-640.
21	Warton D I，Weber N C.Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models［J］.Biometrical Journal，2002，44（2）：161-174.
22	陶冶，张元明.准噶尔荒漠6种类短命植物生物量分配与异速生长关系［J］.草业学报，2014，23（2）：38-48.
	Tao Y，Zhang Y M.Biomass allocation patterns and allometric relationships of six ephemeroid species in Junggar Basin，China［J］.Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2014，23（2）：38-48.
23	Niklas K J.Size-dependent variations in plant growth rates and the “¾-power rule”［J］.American Journal of Botany，1994，81（2）：134-144.
24	林华，陈双林，郭子武，等.苦竹叶片性状及其异速生长关系的密度效应［J］.林业科学研究，2017，30（4）：617-623.
	Lin H，Chen S L，Guo Z W，et al.Allometric relationship among leaf traits in different stand density of Pleioblastus amarus［J］.Forest Research，2017，30（4）：617-623.
25	姜国云，蒋路平，宋双林，等.红松半同胞家系遗传变异分析及果材兼用优良家系选择［J］.植物研究，2018，38（5）：775-784.
	Jiang G Y，Jiang L P，Song S L，et al.Genetic variance analysis and excellent fruit-timber families selection of half-sib Pinus koraiensis［J］.Bulletin of Botanical Research，2018，38（5）：775-784.
26	Weiner J.Allocation，plasticity and allometry in plants［J］.Perspectives in Plant Ecology，Evolution and Systematics，2004，6（4）：207-215.
27	Ogden J.The reproductive strategy of higher plants：II.the reproductive strategy of Tussilago farfara L.［J］.Journal of Ecology，1974，62（1）：219-324．
28	Grime J P.Vegetation classification by reference to strategies［J］.Nature，1974，250（5461）：26-31.
29	Rich P M，Helenurm K，Kearns D，et al.Height and stem diameter relationships for dicotyledonous trees and arborescent palms of costa Rican tropical wet forest［J］.Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club，1986，113（3）：241-246.
30	舒筱武，郑畹，冯弦.云南松种源、林分和家系苗高生长的遗传变异研究［J］.云南林业科技，1998，98（2）：1-9.
	Shu X W，Zheng W，Feng X.Study on seedling height growth hereditary variation of Pinus yunnanensis provenance，stand and family［J］.Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology，1998，98（2）：1-9.
31	刘代亿，李根前，李莲芳，等.云南松优良家系及优良个体苗期选择研究［J］.西北林学院学报，2009，24（4）：67-72.
	Liu D Y，Li G Q，Li L F，et al.Seedling selection of superior families and excellent-individuals selection of Pinus yunnanensis［J］.Journal of Northwest Forestry University，2009，24（4）：67-72.
32	吕学辉，魏巍，陈诗，等.云南松优良家系超级苗选择研究［J］.云南大学学报：自然科学版，2012，34（1）：113-119.
	Lv X H，Wei W，Chen S，et al.Study on super seedling selection of superior families of Pinus yunnanensis franch［J］.Journal of Yunnan University：Natural Sciences，2012，34（1）：113-119.
33	虞泓，葛颂，黄瑞复，等.云南松及其近缘种的遗传变异与亲缘关系［J］.植物学报，2000，42（1）：107-110.
	Yu H，Ge S，Huang R F，et al.A preliminary study on genetic variation and relationships of Pinus yunnanensis and its closely related species［J］.Acta Botanica Sinica，2000，42（1）：107-110.
34	赵广，韩学琴，王雪梅，等.修枝对辣木株高-地径异速生长关系的影响［J］.生态学杂志，2018，37（2）：391-398.
	Zhao G，Han X Q，Wang X M，et al.Effects of pruning on allometric relationship between height and basal diameter of Moringa oleifera［J］.Chinese Journal of Ecology，2018，37（2）：391-398.
35	张连金，孙长忠，辛学兵，等.北京九龙山不同林分树高与胸径相关生长关系分析［J］.中南林业科技大学学报，2014，34（12）：66-70.
	Zhang L J，Sun C Z，Xin X B，et al.Allometric relationship between height and diameter at breast height of different stand in Beijing Jiulong mountain［J］.Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology，2014，34（12）：66-70.
36	吴凡.荒漠草本植物在不同营养条件下不同生长时期异速生长规律研究［D］.兰州：兰州大学，2017.
	Wu F.Allometric law of desert herbs under different nutrition status at different growth stages［D］.Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2017.
37	蔡年辉，李亚麒，许玉兰，等.云南松幼苗生物量分配的家系效应［J］.西部林业科学，2019，48（3）：34-40.
	Cai N H，Li Y Q，Xu Y L，et al.Biomass allocation in different families of Pinus yunnanensis Franch. seedling［J］.Journal of West China Forestry Science，2019，48（3）：34-40.
38	King D A.Allocation of above-ground growth is related to light in temperate deciduous saplings［J］.Functional Ecology，2003，17（4）：482-488.
39	陈莹婷，许振柱.植物叶经济谱的研究进展［J］.植物生态学报，2014，38（10）：1135-1153.
	Chen Y T，Xu Z Z.Review on research of leaf economics spectrum［J］.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology，2014，38（10）：1135-1153.
40	姜成平，孙家京，隋日光，等.L35等黑杨新无性系苗期生长规律研究［J］.山东林业科技，2006，（4）：23-24.
	Jiang C P，Sun J J，Sui R G，et al.Study on growth regularity of new clones of Populus aigeiros（L35et al.）in seedling stage［J］.Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology，2006，（4）：23-24.
41	吴国欣，王凌晖，俞建妹，等.降香黄檀幼苗年生长节律研究［J］.浙江林业科技，2010，30（3）：56-60.
	Wu G X，Wang L H，Yu J M，et al.Study on growth rhythm of Dalbergia odorifera seedlings［J］.Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science and Technology，2010，30（3）：56-60.
42	Norberg R A.Theory of growth geometry of plants and self-thinning of plant populations：geometric similarity，elastic similarity，and different growth modes of plant parts［J］.The American Naturalist，1988，131（2）：220-256．
43	Niklas K J.Plant biomechanics：an engineering approach to plant form and function［M］.Chicago：University of Chicago Press，1992：173-179.
44	林艳.秃杉树干不同高度处直径生长规律［J］.福建林业科技，2013，40（3）：134-137.
	Lin Y.Diameter growth rule of Taiwania flousiana trunk at different height［J］.Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology，2013，40（3）：134-137.
45	HUANG Y X，MARTIN J，Lechowicz，et al.Evaluating general allometric models：interspecific and intraspecific data tell different stories due to interspecific variation in stem tissue density and leaf size［J］.Oecologia，2016，180（3）：671-684.

生长量 Growth	变异来源 Source of variation	离差平方和 Sum of squares of deviations	自由度 df	均方 Mean square	F值 F value	显著性P Significance
苗高 Seedling height	家系Family	5 508.089	48	114.752	28.738	0.000
	误差Error	6 109.321	1 530	3.993
	总和The sum	11 617.411	1 578
地径 Ground diameter	家系Family	668.085	48	13.918	6.998	0.000
	误差Error	3 043.081	1 530	1.989
	总和The sum	3 711.166	1 578

[1]	Binghua CHEN, Jie ZHANG, Guifeng LIU, Siting LI, Yuanke GAO, Huiyu LI, Tianfang LI. Selection of Excellent Families and Evaluation of Selection Method for Pulpwood Half-sibling Families of Betula platyphylla [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(5): 690-699.
[2]	Tingting LI, Liu YANG, Xiaoxia LI, Yisong WANG, Xiuwei WANG. Different Nitrogen Forms on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Growth of Fraxinus mandshurica and Quercus mongolica [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2023, 43(2): 207-217.
[3]	Li GONG, Wei ZHAI, Dan LÜ, Shihang ZHANG, Yuying GE, Zhi HONG, Ye TAO. Variations and Trade-offs in Reproductive Organ Traits of an Invasive Plant Plantago virginica in Different Habitats [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 544-555.
[4]	Xueying WANG, Ruiqi WANG, Yang ZHANG, Cong LIU, Dean XIA, Zhigang WEI. Genome‑wide Identification and Stress Response Analysis of Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channels(CNGC) Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(4): 613-625.
[5]	Qian Sun, Yuhang Wu, Yaxuan Zhang, Jingdan Cao, Jingjing Shi, Chao Wang. Bioinformatic Analysis and Expression Pattern of LTP Family Genes in Populus davidiana × P. alba var. pyramidalis [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2022, 42(2): 211-223.
[6]	Shuang-Hui TIAN, He CHENG, Yang ZHANG, Cong LIU, De-An XIA, Zhi-Gang WEI. Genome-wide Identification and Expressional Analysis of Carotenoid Cleavage Dioxygenases(CCD) Gene Family in Populus trichocarpa under Drought and Salt Stress [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(6): 993-1005.
[7]	Guo-Yu SUN, Xiao-Yu MA, Jia-Xin YI, Fang-Ping ZHANG, Chun-Hua ZHANG, Kai-Long LI. Effects of Nutrient Supply on Growth Dynamics and Nutrient Allocation of Poplars [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021, 41(5): 690-699.
[8]	LIN Lin, GAO Yu-Ting, CHENG Fu-Shan, XIN Ben-Hua, WANG Gui-Chun, XIA Fu-Cai, MU Huai-Zhi. Seed Vigor of Different Half-sib Families in Betula schmidtii [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2020, 40(1): 125-132.
[9]	QIU Dong, ZHANG Jing, WU Nan, TAO Ye. Individual Traits and Their Interrelationships of Gametophyte and Sporophyte of a Moss Pogonatum inflexum in the Dalongshan National Forest Park in Anhui Province [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 835-845.
[10]	ZHU Li-Li, QING Jun, DU Qing-Xin, HE Feng, DU Hong-Yan. Genome-wide Identification and Expression Characteristics of LOX Gene Family in Eucommia ulmoides [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(6): 927-934.
[11]	MA Wen-Mei, WANG Yi-Feng, ZHAO Xia-Wei, LI Lei. Altitude Differences in Reproductive Characteristics and Resource Allocation of Saussurea wellbyi [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(5): 707-715.
[12]	ZHANG Qin-Hui, WANG Hong-Wu, JIANG Guo-Yun, SHEN Guang, WANG Lian-Kui, LI Yan-Long, WANG Lei, WANG Li-Xiang, LI Yue-Ji, LI Rui, ZHAO Xi-Yang. Variation Analysis and Selection of Pinus koraiensis Half-sib Families [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(4): 557-567.
[13]	LUAN Ke-Quan, ZHANG Heng, TIAN Yong-Gang, YANG Shu-Cheng, WANG Hong-Wu, WANG Lian-Kui, LI Yan-Long, LU Zhi-Min, ZHAO Xi-Yang. Variation Analysis of Growth Traits in Different Growth Year of Half-sib Fraxinus mandshurica Families [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(2): 239-245.
[14]	WANG Jia-Qi, ZHANG Xi, LI Li. Bioinformatic and Expression Analysis of HD-Zip Family Gene in Betula platyphylla [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(6): 931-938.
[15]	HUANG Hai-Jiao, PENG Ru-Sheng, LIU Yu, JIANG Jing. Growth Traits Variation Analysis and Family Selection of 3-year-old Various Ploidy Betula platyphylla [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(2): 274-280.