科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量垂直分布特征

doi:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.06.018

植物研究 ›› 2014, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 824-828.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.06.018

科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量垂直分布特征

1.辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院，阜新　123000；
2.中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所，沈阳　110016；
3.辽宁省风沙地改良利用研究所，阜新　123000

收稿日期:2014-06-18 出版日期:2014-11-20 发布日期:2015-01-06
通讯作者: E-mail:songlining2007@126.com
基金资助:

Fine Root Biomass Vertical Distribution Character of Main Afforestation Tree Species in Horqin Sandy Land

1.College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin　123000；
2.Shenyang Institute of Applied Ecology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shenyang　110016；
3.Liaoning Institute of Sandyland Improvement and Utilization,Fuxin　123000

Received:2014-06-18 Online:2014-11-20 Published:2015-01-06
Supported by:

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以科尔沁沙地主要造林树种杨树、榆树、油松和樟子松细根为对象，分析各树种细根生物量的垂直分布特征，探讨其与土壤水分和有机质的关系。结果表明，科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量分布消弱系数为0.68~0.979，32 生樟子松总细根生物量显著高于其它年龄樟子松（P<0.05），而同龄级树种细根总生物量差异不显著（P>0.05）。各树种细根生物量垂直分布与土壤水分的相关性大于土壤有机质（22 生樟子松除外）；10、22、42 生樟子松及44 生油松和35 生榆树细根生物量与土壤水分呈显著正相关（P<0.05），而32 生樟子松和13 生杨树细根生物量与土壤水分呈显著负相关（P<0.05）。以上结果表明，科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量垂直分布较深，其与土壤水分显著相关。

关键词: 细根分布, 土壤水分, 防护林衰退, 沙地

Abstract: We studied the fine root vertical distribution characters of Populus simonii, Ulmus pumila, Pinus tabulaeformis and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in Horqin sandy land, and discussed the relationships with soil water and organic matter. The distribution extinction coefficient of fine root was 0.968-0.979 for main afforestation tree species in Horqin sandy land. There was no significant difference in the total fine root biomass between the same age class tree species (P>0.05), while the value of P.sylvestris var. mongolica was significantly higher at 32 years old than that at the other age (P<0.05). The correlation of the fine root biomass was higher with soil water content than with soil organic matter content except 22-ear old P.sylvestris var. mongolica. There were significant positive linear correlations between the fine root biomass and soil water content for 10-, 22- and 42-year P.sylvestris var. mongolica, 44-year P.tabulaeformis, and 42-year U.pumila(P<0.05), but the relationships were significant negatively correlated for 32 years old P.sylvestris var. mongolica and 13 years old P.simonii(P<0.05). The fine root biomass vertical distribution was deeper for main afforestation tree species in Horqin sandy land with significant dependence on the soil water content.

Key words: fine root distribution, soil water content, shelterbelt decline, sandy land

中图分类号:

王凯1；宋立宁2*；吕林有3；张亮1；秦峥媛1. 科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量垂直分布特征[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(6): 824-828.

WANG Kai1；SONG Li-Ning2*；Lü Lin-You3；ZHANG Liang1；QIN Zheng-Yuan1. Fine Root Biomass Vertical Distribution Character of Main Afforestation Tree Species in Horqin Sandy Land[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2014, 34(6): 824-828.

参考文献

1.朱教君,曾德慧,康宏樟,等.沙地樟子松人工林衰退机制［M］.北京:中国林业出版社,2005.

2.Copley J.Ecology goes underground［J］.Nature,2000,406:452-454.

3.Laclau J P,Arnaud M,Bouillet J P,et al.Spatial distribution of Eucalyptus roots in a deep sandy soil in Congo:relationships with the ability of the stand to take up water and nutrients［J］.Tree Physiology,2001,21:129-136.

4.史建伟,王孟本,陈建文,等.柠条细根的分布和动态及其与土壤资源有效性的关系［J］.生态学报,2011,31(14):3990-3998.

5.King J S,Albaugh T J,Allen H L,et al.Below-ground carbon input to soil is controlled by nutrient availability and fine root dynamics in loblolly pine［J］.New Phytologist,2002,154:389-398.

6.包海龙,贺晓,赵宏宇,等.毛乌素沙地油蒿群落毛细根分布特点及与土壤水分的关系［J］.干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(4):175-178.

7.李鹏,李占斌,赵忠.根系调查取样点数确定方法的研究［J］.水土保持研究,2003,10(1):146-149.

8.Gale M R,Grigal D F.Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status［J］.Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1987,17(8):829-834.

9.张国盛,吴国玺,王林和,等.毛乌素沙地臭柏(Sabina vulgaris)和油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)群落的细根分布特征［J］.生态学报,2009,29(1):18-27.

10.张喜英.作物根系与土壤水利用［M］.北京:气象出版社,1999:7-24.

11.安慧,韦兰英,刘勇,等.黄土丘陵区油松人工林和白桦天然林细根垂直分布及其与土壤养分的关系［J］.植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(4):611-619.

12.陈光水,杨玉盛,高人,等.杉木林年龄序列地下碳分配变化［J］.植物生态学报,2008,32(6):1285-1293.

13.程瑞梅,王瑞丽,肖文发,等.三峡库区马尾松根系生物量的空间分布［J］.生态学报,2012,32(3):823-832.

14.Steele S J,Gower S T,Vogel J G,et al.Root mass,net primary production and turnover in aspen,jack pine and black spruce forests in Saskatchewan and Manitoba,Canada［J］.Tree Physiology,1997,17:577-587.

15.刘健，贺晓，包海龙，等.毛乌素沙地沙柳细根分布规律及与土壤水分分布的关系［J］.中国沙漠,2010,30(6):1362-1366.

16.李月辉,赵羿,胡远满,等.科尔沁沙地东部农牧交错带土地承载力研究——以科尔沁左翼后旗为例［J］.生态学杂志,2003,22(3):23-28.

17.Zhu J J,Li F Q,Xu M L,et al.The role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in alleviating pine decline in semiarid sandy soil of northern China:an experimental approach［J］.Annals of Forest Science,2008,65(3):303-314.

18.韦兰英,上官周平.黄土高原白羊草、沙棘和辽东栎细根比根长特性［J］.生态学报,2006,26(12):4164-4170.

19.岳永杰,余新晓,慕长龙,等.岷江上游干旱河谷区人工林根系生物量及分布格局［J］.东北林业大学学报,2008,36(2):16-18.

20.燕辉,苏印泉,朱昱燕,等.秦岭北坡杨树人工林细根分布与土壤特性的关系［J］.南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(2):85-89.

21.王迪海,赵忠,李剑.土壤水分对黄土高原主要造林树种细根表面积季节动态的影响［J］.植物生态学报,2010,34(7):819-826.

22.张志山,李新荣,张景光,等.用Minirhizotrons观测柠条根系生长动态［J］.植物生态学报,2006,30(3):457-464.

[1]	张珊珊, 袁春明. 土壤水分和光强对景东翅子树幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2022, 42(3): 502-511.
[2]	艾宁, 宗巧鱼, 高金续, 强大宏, 刘长海. 陕北黄土区雨季后山地枣林土壤水分动态变化研究[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(4): 559-567.
[3]	强方方, 魏天兴, 刘崴. 晋西黄土区土壤水分动态变化与植被群落关系研究[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(1): 61-68.
[4]	袁肖寒1,2；张彦东1；高学军2；顾成波1*. 土壤水分对麦蓝菜生物量及王不留行黄酮苷含量的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(6): 835-839.
[5]	梁静;魏学智*. 酸枣叶对土壤水分的生理生化响应[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(5): 549-555.
[6]	初敬华;韩国君. 吉林西部野生罗布麻生长季内土壤水盐变化趋势的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2010, 30(2): 238-242.
[7]	狄晓艳;朱小琪;马建平;池喜梅;陈建文;王孟本*. 土壤水分胁迫对5个种源油松光合特性的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(5): 539-543.
[8]	红雨*;王林和. 臭柏群落在不同演替阶段某些群落特征的研究[J]. 植物研究, 2008, 28(1): 109-113.
[9]	张红霞, 刘果厚, 崔秀萍. 干旱对浑善达克沙地榆叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 植物研究, 2005, 25(1): 39-44.
[10]	周海燕. 中国东北科尔沁沙地两种建群植物的抗旱机理[J]. 植物研究, 2002, 22(1): 51-55.
[11]	王铁娟, 赵一之. 绣线菊属二新种[J]. 植物研究, 2000, 20(4): 361-364.
[12]	陈喜全, 关继义, 张伟, 崔晓阳. 三北防护林地区土壤水分动态研究[J]. 植物研究, 1994, 14(2): 186-190.
[13]	徐文铎, 李维典, 郑沅. 内蒙古沙地云杉分类的研究[J]. 植物研究, 1994, 14(1): 59-68.

科尔沁沙地主要造林树种细根生物量垂直分布特征

Fine Root Biomass Vertical Distribution Character of Main Afforestation Tree Species in Horqin Sandy Land

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价