欢迎访问《植物研究》杂志官方网站,今天是 分享到:

›› 2006, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 53-57.doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.01.012

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

对孙成仁的“五味子科植物种子表面微形态及其系统学意义”一文之商榷

林 祁   

  1. 中国科学院植物研究所系统与进化植物学重点实验室, 北京 100093
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2006-01-20 发布日期:2006-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 林 祁

Discussions on “Micromorphological features of the seed surface of Schisandraceae and their systematic significance” put forwarded by SUN Cheng-Ren

LIN Qi   

  1. Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2006-01-20 Published:2006-01-20
  • Contact: LIN Qi

摘要: 孙成仁在2002年《植物分类学报》第40卷第2期“五味子科植物种子表面微形态及其系统学意义”一文中对林祁(2000)所做的五味子科分类学修订提出了不同的看法。本文对此作出解答,认为由于双方在实验材料、实验方法、实验结果、植物分类学研究方法等方面存在差异,从而得出不同的研究结论。

关键词: 五味子科, 种子形态

Abstract: Different research results have been put forward by C. R. Sun in the thesis,“Micromorphological features of the seed surface of Schisandraceae and their systematic significance”from Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2002, 40(2): 97-109. Because of difference among experimental materials, methods, results and taxonomic research methods, both sides get different research results. This paper will discuss it.

Key words: Schisandraceae, seed morphology, taxonomy